Eurolect – Rhetorics of the Para-Christian

There is a very prominent and originally intentionally Christian cross in the official flag of the Kingdom of Sweden. In being the official flag of secular Sweden, virtually no one in Sweden (whether Christian, post-Christian or non-Christian) considers this clearly Para-Christian flag to be Christian anymore.

The hegemony of Euro-Christian culture is no longer consecrated through its association with Christianity but indeed through its very discursive, yet only nominal dissociation from Christianity.

Christendom as a civilization was historically rather early divided between the powers of the princes of church (Christianity) and the powers of the princes of state (Christendom) in accordance with the papal letter of Duo Sunt in the year 494. Yet, “universal legitimacy” was usually derived from explicit association with Christianity. However, in now superficially secularized Christendom, universal legitimacy is rather in contrast predominantly derived from dissociation from Christianity.

Contemporary Christendom (i.e. cultural Christianity) hence now also derives its global semiotic hegemony as a civilization from its very semiotic dissociation from Christianity rather than from its association with Christianity. (a) This is often, but not necessarily unconscious whether mutual or one-directional. (b) The dissociation may be friendly, hostile or indifferent. (c) In some philosophical contexts, especially deconstruction; something being implicitly “Para-Christian” usually otherwise referred to as “metaphysical” may be perceived as of a type of post-religious “sin” in and of itself.

Yet, something being articulated as metaphysical in modernity (which usually means something being “Para-Christian”) means in most cases that it is considered bad (i.e. immoral) and sometimes indeed incorrectly presumed so without necessary argumentation. Most things Para-Christian are thus both nonsensical and would be trivial if not for the usually severely malign political consequences. Whether Para-Christian discursive phenomena are either tragic or worthy of being retained in some deconstructed form or shape can in most cases be gathered from the mostly tragic political applications throughout the history of modernity. The classification of the Para-Christian is thus mostly one of classifying political, historical tragedy in modernity. This classification is not merely an act of saying that the metaphysical is not what it claims it is, but this is also an act of learning from the follies of modernity including modernity disguised as so called “post-modernity” as a new axiomatics is surely needed (as Derrida reminds us) in the place of what is unfortunately mostly utter nonsense.

There are thus 4 contemporary types of Para-Christian discursive phenomena:

I. Elements of Christianity contextually unassociated with Christianity
II. Reinvention of Christianity under other names
III. Positions directly/indirectly articulated in opposition to Christianity and/or Christendom
IV. Subconscious Christianity

One should certainly preventively envisage future appearance of additional categories of Para-Christian phenomena:

V. Opposing everything Para-Christian without distinction for being Para-Christian
VI. Opposing particular things Para-Christian merely for being Para-Christian

Hence, mapping this structure of mostly political nonsense must necessarily be a mere beginning towards articulating a new axiomatics that must not be limited to the relatively few worthy, even indispensable elements of the Para-Christian usually articulated as independence or interdependence. This emerging ethical axiomatics must thus engage in a kind of deconstructive harvest of worthy ideas from literally everywhere, not just from the otherwise mostly delusional world of the Para-Christian. This coming, emerging multicultural worldwide deconstructive harvest of ethically worthy axioms from all kinds of literatures, religious and otherwise would thus be enabled by this practice of simple classification of the mostly malignly nonsensical structures of the Para-Christian.

Yet, this practice of ethical classification of the Para-Christian is precisely enabled, indeed capacitated by critical memory of the very history of political tragedy in modernity. The new axiomatics hence needs to be anticipated by a certain rigorous science of Psemography, a science devoted to studying lies rather than merely studying truth in splendid separation from lies as is indeed the traditional scholarly endeavor. By rigorously studying the structures of lies wherever they appear, then surely we can also immeasurably better comprehend veracious validities and indeed better anticipate an emerging field of responsibly ethico-political axiomatics not merely reducible to mere Master-Slave Morality as increasingly often presumed in the intersection of politics and critical theory.

Metaphysics is the DNA of civilization, constituting the matrix of underlying usually implicit categorization, especially the often implicit distinctions between good and bad. But rather than call it metaphysics, let’s call it a proper name in the context of discursive Eurocentrism, namely the Para-Christian. This is not to say that similar critiques should not be performed with regard to other imperialist civilizations, it certainly should although not necessarily in the same exact manner as the context is not identical. Mapping the Para-Christian means mapping largely subconscious presumptions at the core of Eurocentric civilization.

It is however possible that some persons may in the future specifically endeavor to articulate a seemingly consistent opposition to everything Para-Christian (including inversions of Christianity) despite the historical fact that not everything Para-Christian is bad. Surely, it would be difficult to imagine anything more consistently Para-Christian than that. Simply something being Para-Christian is not in and of itself sufficient evidence that something is bad, false and/or wrong. Yet, the Para-Christian needs to be responsibly deconstructed as part of a universal, responsible harvest of genuinely good axioms from discourses from around the world, including literary and religious ones.

Abjectocentrism
Assuming that Political Abjects are guilty
Assuming that Political Abjects are innocent
Denigration of Political Abjects for Higher Purposes
Epistemological Appropriation of Political Abjects for Higher Purposes
Extermination of Political Abjects for Higher Purposes
Obsession with political abjects, whether favorable, neutral or adverse
Patronization of Political Abjects for Higher Purposes

Absolute Theoretical Equality
Liberal absolute metaphysical equality
Marxist absolute material equality
Assuming that human adults are intrinsic equals
Assuming that human citizens are intrinsic equals
Assuming that human civilizations are intrinsic equals
Assuming that human cultures are intrinsic equals
Assuming that human religions are equals

Agrophilia (oppression in name of valuing human cultures)

Ajudaism
Assuming that Atheism is correct because Christianity is not
Assuming that Conservatism is correct because Liberalism is not
Assuming that Humanism is correct because Nazism is not
Assuming that liberal democracy is an ideal system because dictatorship is not
Assuming that Liberalism is correct because Marxism is not
Assuming that Liberalism is correct because Nazism is not
Assuming that Marxism is correct because Liberalism is not
Assuming that Marxism is correct because Nazism is not
Assuming that one physionomism (anti-body prejudice) is correct because another physionomism is not
Atheism
Negation of only Christian conception of divinity
Nihilism
Metaphysically Christian denial of divine existence
Political Dichotomies

Almighty Government
Communism
Democracy
Fascism
Islamism
Nazism

Andropocentrism (Andro-Anthropo-centrism)
Animal welfare discourse
Assuming that “all men are born free and equal”
Assuming that “all men are created equal”
Egalitarian physionomistic supremacism
Rights of Man
Subordination of Sentient suffering to metaphysical Reason
Universal Brotherhood
Universal Hum-unity

Andropocracy (over “inhuman” inferiors)
Communism
Democracy
Fascism
Liberalism
Nazism

Anti-Carnal Metaphysics  

Anti-Commercialism

Anti-Death
Anti-abortion (even with regard to pre-conscious human embryos/fetuses)
Animal rights/liberation
Anti-eugenics (as premised on the notion that eugenics inevitably leads to mass murder)
Anti-euthanasia
Anti-stem-cell research
Death & suffering-centered Shoah memorial (as opposed to focus on the termination of generational reproductive life cycles and deprivation of life experience)
Expectations of eternal youth
Fear of people with disabilities and medical conditions
Humanitarianism
Pacifism
Principle of proportionality in warfare
Sacrifice of non-human persons “for the sake of all humanity”
Secular metaphysics of suffering (intersectionality and other forms of Marxist critical theory)
Utilitarianism
Viewing death as cosmologically external to life

Anti-Magic
Chemical Anti-Life
Opposition to suggestive medicine
Opposition to bio-medicine
Holding surgical medicine to non-stringent scientific standards
Scientific torture

Anti-Sex Feminism
Female somatic separatism
Heterosexual celibacy
Intergenerational minor/adult celibacy
Iconoclast opposition to sexual depiction
Matriarchal parallel structure
Claiming that heterosexual reproductive intercourse is sinful
Claiming that heterosexual celibacy is ethically superior to heterosexual intercourse
Claiming that all sex work is intrinsically demeaning
Claiming that all sexual depiction is intrinsically demeaning
Assuming that procreative intercourse is an historically necessary evil
Claiming that somatic heterosexuality is the root of all things bad
Cultural opposition to HG nudity
Cultural opposition to representation of HG nudity
Cultural opposition to representation of HG sexuality
Cultural opposition to nudity among legal minors
Cultural opposition to representation of nudity among legal minors
Cultural opposition to representation of sexuality among legal minors

Archives of antiquated texts

Ascribing complete moral disprivilege to Jews and/or non-HG PS
Assuming that the dignity of Jews and PS have little if any ethical value

Automatic Derivation
Ideological-metaphysical “personal” political views

Bio-Categorical Egalitarian Supremacism
Nobility Supremacism
Free-White-Adult-Male-Functional supremacism
Male Adult Functional supremacism
HSS Adult Functional supremacism
Gentile supremacism
Great Ape supremacism
Mammal supremacism

Bio-dichotomies
Assuming that flesh generally constitutes dichotomies
Assuming that sentient persons generally are both carnally and metaphysically conjoined into dichotomous bio-categories through a mystical matter known as “sameness”
Assuming that there are dichotomous gaps between all singular individuals

Bio-Dogmatism (Christian dogma transfigured and justified through Nazicentric fallacies)
Anti-Jewish pacifism (requiring only Israel to practice pacifism)
Claiming that eugenics is intrinsically bad because the Nazis claimed that economic murder is eugenic
Claiming that the dysgenic Shoah involving the murder of six million Jews was eugenic because the Nazis said so
Claiming that liberal democracy must adhere to Christian morality with regard to bio-ethics or else Nazis will take power
Claiming that informed consensual euthanasia is intrinsically bad because the Nazis claimed that industrialized cruel mass murder constitute euthanasia
Claiming that veganism is bad because the carnivore Hitler is reported to have recommended some of his visitors to become lacto-vegetarians
Claiming that the Anti-German and Pro-Jewish philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche was proto-Fascist because the Nazis claimed him for Nazism and misappropriated some Nietzschean concepts out of context
Claiming that all killing is bad because the Nazis claimed that any killing on their part was justified
Claiming that the legal validity of specific Israeli military action must always be judged against the background of Nazi crimes
Putting faith in historical Nazi political propaganda for the purpose of “bio-ethics”
Revisionist-Retroactive Reconstruction of the Shoah as a Reverse Discourse of Ecclesial Doctrine
Tacit Subsumption of Bio-Ethics to Christian Dogma without explicitly stating so

Blasphemous Parody

Caritas
Development aid
NGO charity
Welfare state
White man’s burden

Carnal time
Oppressing those who do not fit current Humanist idealization

Celestial Empire
European Union
League of Nations
United Nations

Child cult
Anti-Pedo persecution
Discursive semiotic contamination of sexual minors
Intergenerational sexual trauma libel
Pedo-Aesthetics for adults (e.g. body hair removal, mini-nose and flat skin)
Pedo libel
Worship of “innocent” children

Chosen taxon
Chosen race
Choses species
Physionomistic supremacist egalitarianism

Christianized language
Systemic dichotomous written language
Privileging Greek and Latin words for scientific terminology
Privileging Christian understanding of Greek and Latin terminology
Privileging the Latin script

Civil Exegetics
Assuming that justice is invested in legal exegesis
Assuming that law must be reinterpreted in light of changing culture
Assuming that law must not be reinterpreted in light of changing values
Assuming that prejudice is warranted and legitimate if derived from legal exegesis
Assuming that truth is invested in legal exegesis
Assuming that the truth of law is beyond the nominal meaning of legal text
Assuming that interpretative judicial exegetics reflects “the law itself”
Reading alleged intentions of legal authors into legal texts
Reading imagined intentions of legislators into legal texts
Reading alleged values of legal authors into legal texts
Reading one’s own expectation into legal texts
Reading one’s own prejudice into legal texts
Reading one’s own values into legal texts
Reading one’s own views into legal texts
Secular opposition to alleged Christian literalism
Secular opposition to alleged Islamic literalism
Secular opposition to alleged rabbinical Jewish literalism
Subjection of law to discursive discrimination

Civil torment
Forcible confession through physical violence
Forcible confession through psychological violence
Forcible confession through sexual violence
Forcible confession through physical intimidation
Forcible confession through psychological intimidation
Forcible confession through sexual intimidation
Sentenced cloistering to psychiatric prison
Sentenced cloistering to penological prison
Extra-judicial individual cloister restrictions not meted out in the sentence
Extra-judicial collective cloister restrictions not meted out in the sentence
Almighty Forgiveness Board

Cloistering
Seeking to improve the individual ‘HSS nature’ by means of spatial isolation

Combined Abjection and Worship of bodies
Supremacist Division of Embodied Life into the Desired and the Despised

Commercial heraldry
Logotypes

Common Era
BC/AD
BCE/CE

Common Pure Origin
Aryan hypothesis of Nordic supremacy
The assumption that “HSS” are ontologically different from other sentient individuals
The assumption that “HSS” are ontologically separate from other sentient individuals
Theory of recent singular African origin

Communism

Compulsory Monogamy
Principled opposition to Polyamory

Compulsory Romantic Love
Principled opposition to arranged marriage

Concentration Facilities
Animal Industry of Evil
Gulags
Concentration camps

Continentalism
Afrocentrism
Anti-Europeanism
Anti-Semitism
Anti-Zionism
Assuming that Africa is a separate “continent”
Assuming that Asia is a separate “continent”
Assuming that Europe is a separate “continent”
Assuming that North America is a separate “continent”
Assuming that South America is a separate “continent”
Assuming that the Bering Strait is a metaphysically meaningful distinction
Assuming that the Caucasus Mountains are a metaphysically meaningful distinction
Assuming that the Panama Canal is a metaphysically meaningful distinction
Assuming that the Suez Canal is a metaphysically meaningful distinction
Assuming that the Ural Mountains are a metaphysically meaningful distinction
Assuming that “continents” are metaphysically meaningful categories
Europeanism
Exclusion of Israel from all UN “regional groups”
Occidentalism
Orientalism
Pigmentocentrism

Culturalism
Claiming that HG taxonomic bio-groups are mere culture only
Claiming that HG sex differences are mere culture only
Claiming that intra-HG adult average bio-group cognitive difference is mere culture only
Claiming that all physionomism is mere culture only
Claiming that ethnic groups need to be spatially separated on account of cultural difference
Cultural relativism

Cultural supremacism
Claiming that culture and nature constitute an intrinsic metaphysical dichotomy
Claiming that societies “of culture” are superior to societies “of nature”
Claiming that HG societies can be divided in cultural societies and natural societies
Claiming that PS societies can be divided into cultural societies and natural societies
Claiming that cultural societies may legitimately appropriate natural societies
Claiming that Earth belongs exclusively to HG
Claiming that Earth belongs exclusively to Whites
Claiming that Earth belongs exclusively to gentiles
Claiming that Earth belongs exclusively to Muslims
Claiming that Economy belongs exclusively to HG
Claiming that Economy belongs exclusively to Whites
Claiming that Economy belongs exclusively to gentiles
Claiming that Land intrinsically belongs exclusively to Arabists
Claiming that Land belongs exclusively to HG
Claiming that Land belongs exclusively to Whites
Claiming that Land belongs exclusively to Blacks
Claiming that Land belongs exclusively to gentiles
Claiming that Land belongs exclusively to Muslims
Claiming that Nature belongs exclusively to HG
Claiming that Nature belongs exclusively to Whites
Claiming that Sovereignty belongs exclusively to HG
Claiming that Sovereignty belongs exclusively to Whites
Claiming that Sovereignty belongs exclusively to gentiles
Claiming that Universe belongs exclusively to HG
Development aid
White Man’s Burden
White Woman’s Burden

Denominationalism 
Critical Theory Denominationalism
Emancipation Denominationalism
Feminist Denominationalism
Ideological Denominationalism
Partisan Denominationalism
Philosophical Denominationalism

Devaluation of Carnal Origins
Assuming that HG are socially constructed while other PS are “biologically” constructed
Denigration of “inferior” biodiversity
Denial of cognitive biodiversity
Erasure of carnal origin
Erasure of sexualities

Diabolization
Jews
Witches
Nazis
Israelis
Americans
Pedos
Muslims

Dichotomous politics

Doctrinal Egoism       
Communism
Humanism
Libertarianism
Nazism
Satanism
Selfish gene doctrine

East/West Dichotomy (originally pertaining to the Orthodox/Catholic geographic split)
Anti-Eastern opposition
Anti-Northern opposition
Anti-Southern opposition
Anti-Western opposition
Arabism/Zionism
Afro-Asian/European
Asia/Europe
Barbarism/Civilization
Black/White
Conservative/Liberal
Culture/Nature
Dictatorship/Democracy
Eastern Europe/Western Europe
Israeli/Jewish
Jewish/Aryan
Jewish/Christian
Jewish/Israeli
Mizrahi/Ashkenazi
Monarchy/Republic
Muslim/Christian
Muslim/Jewish
Occidentalism/Orientalism
Oriental/Western
Palestinian/Israeli
Reactionary/Progressive
Religious/Secular
Right/Left
Sephardi/Ashkenazi
Socialist/Liberal
South/North
USSR/USA
Subhuman/Aryan
Non-White/White
Zionism/Palestinism

Eating Disorders

Eco-Morality
Assuming that ascribed HG individual dignity should be a derivative of economic utility
Assuming that ascribed PS individual dignity should be a derivative of economic utility
Assuming that domination is generally part of “nature”
Assuming that Euro-Christian society is the “natural” one
Assuming that Euro-Christian economy is the “natural” one
Assuming that formal environmental ownership is intrinsically legitimate
Assuming that misfortune is intrinsically legitimate
Assuming that strength is intrinsically deserved
Assuming that the level of power is justice
Assuming that weakness is intrinsically deserved
Assuming that the affluent are entitled to wealth
Assuming that the indigent are not entitled to wealth
Assuming that the affluent are not entitled to wealth
Assuming that the indigent are entitled to wealth
Capitalist-Darwinian reductionism
Discursive privileging of competition over cooperation
Discursive privileging of cooperation over competition

Enlightenment “in the moral darkness”

Epistemology of the Cloister
Privileging thought either derived in opposition to or directly from Christian philosophy
Secular invocation of Christian and/or Anti-Christian metaphysics for “secular” purposes

Equal Birth (humanist tabula rasa denial of HG cognitive genetic bio-diversity)
Leftist assumption that domestic statistical group differences in same-age HG achievement are solely due to structural oppressions, structural discrimination and societal inequality
Rightist assumption that domestic statistical group differences in same-age HG achievement are solely due to the exercise of individual self-control and individual work ethics
Leftist assumption that domestic individual statistical differences in same-age HG achievement are solely due to structural oppressions and structural discrimination and societal inequality
Rightist assumption that domestic individual statistical differences in same-age HG achievement are solely due to the exercise of individual self-control and individual work ethics

Eschatological bio-determinism
Liberalism
Marxism
Nazism

Eschatological-dichotomous inter-group struggle
Civilization (i.e. struggle between “culture” and “nature”)
Class wars (waged by Conservatives, Liberals and Socialists)
Feminist sex wars
Laissez-faire competition
Left/right dichotomy
Metaphysical ecology
Metaphysical evolution
Race wars (White/Black, Aryan/Jewish etc.)
Reaction/Progression
Struggles for selective emancipation
War on Nature (Human/Inhuman)
Wars of Liberation

Euro-Classical Harmonic Music

Euroid bio-normativity (a.k.a. as “the subject” or “Universal Man”)  
Able-bodied physionomism
Adult normativity
Andro-Euroid Anti-Difference
Assuming that idealized Euroid biology is representative of the entire living Homo genus
Assuming that average Euroid cognition is representative of the entire living Homo genus
Cognitive heterosexism
Common Consciousness
De-pigmented normativity
Euroid economics
Euroid ideal types
HG only Tabula Rasa bio-normative cognition
Homo Economicus
HSS bio-ideo-logical separatism
HSS Nature
HSS supremacist rights
Humanism
Ideal dimorphism
Idiocism
Liberalism
Libertarianism
Monogamism
Medical diagnoses
Neuro-normativity
Psychometric normativity
Psychopathic normativity
Secular family
Secular ideological hetero-normativity
Secular Tabula rasa
Secular Virginity
Sexduality
School grading that place pupils on a comparative spectrum
Somatic heterosexism
Soul-body dichotomy
Subjectism
The Subject
Universal Sameness
Working-Age Normativity
Andro-homonormativity
Gyno-heteronormativity

Eurosamecentrism (Para-Christian phenomena with widespread historical cultural parallels prior to the age of Euro-Christian colonialism)
Anti-Blasphemy
Bio-normativity
Charity
Cities
Civilization
Clergy
Dysgenic hunting
Economy
Exclusively HG ownership of all environments
Hereditary head of state
Imperialism/colonialism
Just war
Law
Linear eschatological time
Money
Monodoxy (assuming or claiming that there is always only one single truth)
Monasteries
Nationalism

Eurosintrism
Accounts of “everything” founded and centered on pre-assumed sin
Assuming that it is always the Euroids who are the bad guys
Assuming that it is always the Christians who are the bad guys
Assuming that it is always the “Westerners” who the bad guys
Stigmatizing Israelis as European bad guys
Stigmatizing Israelis as “Nazi” bad guys
Identifying Euroids as intrinsically sinful
Identifying Christians as intrinsically sinful
Identifying “Westerners” as intrinsically sinful
Stigmatizing Israelis as intrinsically sinful Europeans
Stigmatizing Israelis as intrinsically sinful “Nazis”
Assuming that Euroids are always wrong
Assuming that Christians are always wrong
Assuming that “Westerners” are always wrong
Stigmatizing Israelis as Europeans who are always wrong
Stigmatizing Israelis as “Nazis” who are always wrong
Assuming that Euroids inherit original sin
Assuming that Christians inherit original sin
Assuming that “Westerners” inherit original sin
Stigmatizing Israelis as Europeans with inherited original sin
Stigmatizing Israelis as “Nazis” with inherited original sin
Stigmatizing Israelis as inheritors of European original sin
Stigmatizing Israelis as inheritors of Nazi original sin
Assuming that imperialists are always Europeans
Assuming that imperialists are always “Westerners”
Assuming that the miniscule Israel is “imperialist”
Assuming that liberal democratic Israel is “Nazi”
Non-Muslim support for Muslim imperialism in the name of opposition to Christian imperialism
Claiming that imperialism is something intrinsically and exclusively European
Assuming that confession of sin on the part of the people of Christendom will bring salvation to the entire so called “humanity”
Assuming that confession of sin on the part of the people of ancient Christendom will bring salvation to the rest of the world

Eurosupremacism  
Euro-Christian colonialism
Euroid physionomistic supremacism
European values
Secular Cultural Conservatism
Secular Cultural supremacism
Secular Moral supremacism
Secular Physionomistic supremacism
Secular Semiotic supremacism
Secular Universal Physionomism

Eurosyntrism
Assuming that all humans are essentially cognitive Europeans
Assuming that Para-Christian culture is superior to all other HG cultures
Assuming that Para-Christian culture is inferior to all other HG cultures
Assuming that Para-Christian culture is equal to all other HG cultures
Assuming that Para-Christian societal structures are superior to those of all other HG cultures
Assuming that Para-Christian societal structures are inferior to those of all other HG cultures
Assuming that Para-Christian societal structures are equal to those of all other HG cultures
Assuming that Para-Christian economics is superior to those of all other HG cultures
Assuming that Para-Christian economics is inferior to those of all other HG cultures
Assuming that Para-Christian economics is equal to those of all other HG cultures
Assuming that Para-Christian thought is superior to those of all other HG cultures
Assuming that Para-Christian thought is inferior to those of all other HG cultures
Assuming that Para-Christian thought is equal to those of all other HG cultures
Assuming that Para-Christian art is superior to those of all other HG cultures
Assuming that Para-Christian art is inferior to those of all other HG cultures
Assuming that Para-Christian art is equal to those of all other HG cultures
Assuming that Para-Christian ideology is superior to those of all other HG cultures
Assuming that Para-Christian ideology is inferior to those of all other HG cultures
Assuming that Para-Christian ideology is equal to those of all other HG cultures
Assuming that Para-Christian politics is superior to those of all other HG cultures
Assuming that Para-Christian politics is inferior to those of all other HG cultures
Assuming that Para-Christian politics is equal to those of all other HG cultures

Exclusion by Humanist idealization
Liberalism: the inhuman
Marxism: the inhumane
Nazism: the subhuman

Exclusive sexuality
Assuming that types of sexualities are intrinsically mutually exclusive
Assuming that one form of sexuality in an individual is always defining

Extended Anti-Judaism
Anti-Americanism
Anti-Christian Secularism
Anti-Capitalism
Anti-Europeanism, including Anti-Euroid taxonomic Physionomism
Anti-Haredism
Anti-Judeochristianism
Anti-Kimoid taxonomic physionomism
Anti-LGBTQ sexual physionomism
Anti-Papism
Anti-Pedo sexual physionomism
Anti-Semitic taxonomic physionomism
Anti-Ziganist taxonomic physionomism
Anti-Zoophile sexual physionomism
Anti-Zionism (Anti-Jewish discursive discrimination)
Explicitly Christian Anti-Muslim religious polemics
Gentile Supremacism
Marxist ontology
Muslim Anti-Zionism
Nazi universal physionomism
Occidentalism
Orientalism
Palestinism
Political Anti-Zionism, including Anti-Zionist taxonomic physionomism
Radical Feminist Anti-Penetration sexual physionomism

Faith based secularity

Fall of Man through sexual semiotic contamination
Assuming that HG youth is pure and easily contaminated through sexual contact with the phallic snake
Assuming that HG somatic females are pure and easily contaminated through sexual contact with the phallic snake
Assuming that other PS are pure and easily contaminated through sexual contact with the HG phallic snake

Flags

Free Choice Evil
Assuming that contractual relationships among economic non-equals justify unethical acts
Assuming that particular evil choice is metaphysically good because it is “free”
Assuming that free choice justifies contractual economic limitation in the free will of others
Assuming that free choice justifies economic murder of “inferior” sentient individuals
Assuming that free choice metaphysically justifies enslavement of “inferior” sentient individuals
Assuming that free choice metaphysically justifies evil choice
Assuming that free choice metaphysically justifies scientific torture on “inferior sentient individuals
Assuming that free choice justifies procurement of unethically produced products
Assuming that HG free will justifies enslaving other PS
Assuming that HG enslavement, torture and murder of other PS is legitimate due to the patently false claim that all or nearly all members of the Homo genus are generally able to determine ex nihilo what is good and evil without having been told so beforehand by some kind of societal authority
Assuming that metaphysical self-ownership justifies ownership of other sentient individuals

Gambling culture
Advocacy of economic privileges of left and right as economic “rights”
Anti-Market ideologies
Betting
Economic sciences
Exclusively HG ownership
Financial markets
Gambling economy
Game moralities

Homo Economicus
Liberal agency
Lotteries
Market ideologies
Metaphysics of choice
Metaphysics of HG territoriality
Metaphysics of ownership
Volatile stock markets

Gardening as a political and social ideal
Turning society and entire countries into mega-gardens subject to political gardening

Gentile Judeocentrism Gentile obsession with Jews, whether favorable, neutral or adverse
Antivrism
Anti-Judaism
Anti-Semitism
Anti-Zionism
Assuming that all Middle Eastern problems will be resolved once there are signed agreements
Assuming that secular conversion of Jews to Christian concepts is pivotal for the entire world
Christian Zionism
Anti-Jewish Judeocentrism
Muslim Zionism
Racist news evaluation

Hellenocentrism
The tacit assumption that Hellenist European cultural origins are unmediated by historical Christianity

Holy Family
Holy Man
Holy Woman
Holy Child
Holy HSS only
Holy Embryo
Holy Fetus
Holy Youth Virgin

Hostile Christocentrism
Assuming that certain kinds of sin are intrinsic to Euroids
Assuming that citizens of genetically non-European dictatorships are oppressed by Euroids
Assuming that imperial domination is a predominantly Euroid practice in the current contemporary world

Humanist idealization 
Bureaucratic discrimination against those who do not the particular humanist idealization
Demonization of those who do not fit the particular humanist idealization
Negating personhood of those sentient persons who do not fit a particular humanist idealization
Cloistering for the purpose of enforcing Euroid bio-normativity
Industrial mass murder of those who do not fit the particular humanist idealization

Hemanization
Dictatorship of the proletariat
Enforced secular cloisters
Brotherhood supremacism
Expulsion of Animality
Expulsion of sub-humanity
Incarceration of Inhumanity
Extermination of sub-humanity
Forcing other PS to live in HG designed captive environments
Industrial enslavement
Euro-Christian colonialism

Heman-unity
Denial of living HG subspecies
Recognition of living human subspecies
Assuming that current HG differentiation is taxonomically interior and “extinct” HG differentiation is taxonomically exterior to “heman-unity”

Ideological Matrimony
Adultonormativity
Heteronormativity
Mononormativity
Parentonormativity
Taxonormativity

Idiocism 
Assuming that all humans are cognitively essentially like oneself
Assuming that altruism and egoism are intrinsically dichotomous
Assuming that altruism is fully reducible to self-interest
Assuming that bio-categorical self-interest must be put before everything else
Assuming that national self-interest must be put before everything else
Assuming that self-interest is divorced from altruism
Assuming that self-interest must be pursued exclusively of other interests
Assuming that sentient individuals are self-interested machines
Assuming that it is legitimate to harm others provided that they are first fooled
Assuming that it is legitimate to harm others provided that consent is extracted
Assuming that it is legitimate to harm others provided that their consent is derived through their lack of choices
Assuming that it is legitimate to harm others provided that consent is derived through exploitation of limited cognitive capacity
Assuming that it is legitimate to harm others provided that unwilling consent is provided
Assuming that citizens are non-independent cells of “the national body”
Assuming that citizens are fully independent cells of “the market”
Assuming that all individual behavior of sentient individuals is reducible to self-interest
Assuming that supremacist physionomistic bio-categorical privileges are “individual”
Assuming that sentient individuals generally must be treated in accordance with the ostensible bio-normativity of ascribed bio-categorical “membership”
Assuming HG are natural predators
Assuming that HG are natural loners
Assuming that everyone learns the same way as oneself does
Doctrinal egoism
Lockean-Marxian Tabula rasa

Information dissemination culture

Innocent Suffering
Liberalism
Marxism
Utilitarianism

Intelligent Design

International law
Claiming that the entire universe belongs exclusively to HSS
Claiming that only HSS have “rights”
Claiming that all HSS have “equal” metaphysical “rights”
Claiming that HSS everywhere are joined in a biologistic instinctual unity of sameness
Claiming that only peoples with titular polities are entitled to self-determination
Claiming that only gentile peoples are entitled to self-determination
Claiming that anything is right as long as sanctioned by the UN Security Council
Claiming that anything is just as long as sanctioned by the UN Security Council
Claiming that no war is just unless sanctioned by the UN Security Council
Claiming that anything is right as long as sanctioned by the UN General Assembly
Claiming that anything is just as long as sanctioned by the UN General Assembly
Claiming that no war is just unless sanctioned by the UN General Assembly
Accusing Israelis of being carnal

Invisible Hand
Assuming that asymmetric distribution of wealth is an expression of justice
Assuming that asymmetric distribution of wealth is an expression of injustice

Judeo-Greek circular dialectics   
Judaizing extended Anti-Hellenism (e.g. Christian right and state communism)
Hellenizing extended Anti-Judaism (e.g. liberalism and fascism)
Anti-LGBTQ/Anti-Israel
Equality/Liberty
Morality/Liberty
Conservatism/Liberalism
Socialism/Liberalism
Somatic/Cognitive
Nurture/Nature
Belief/Emotion

Judeosintrism
Disproportionate focus on alleged Israeli sin without holding Israel’s rivals or foreign governments generally to the same standards of conduct
Generally placing unfounded journalist confidence in canards about non-existent Israeli sin
Assuming that one-sided Jewish confession of alleged/actual sin is conducive to peace
Assuming that one-sided Jewish confession of alleged/actual sin will lead to salvation the entire region
Believing that one-sided Jewish confession of alleged/actual sin will lead to salvation of the entire Muslim world
Assuming that one-sided Jewish confession of alleged/actual sin will lead to salvation of the entire the world
Assuming that regurgitation of Palestinian of alleged/actual Palestinian suffering is conducive to peace
Assuming that re-inscribing the Palestinian dispute by reducing it to European Master-Slave morality be denying the historical political agency of Israel’s rivals is conducive to peace   

Legal regulation of expression
Anti-Blasphemy
Anti-Censorship
Freedom of Expression
Censorship

Liberocentrism
Anti-Carnal Emancipation
Anti-Carnal Political Salvation
Assuming that freedom justifies poverty
Metaphysics of Choice
Selective Emancipation

Logocracy
Rule through Para-Christian metaphysics

Logodoxy
Antipolytruism
Assuming singular origin à priori
Assuming that non-Christian culture is fully reducible to Christian metaphysics
Assuming that there is no perception beyond Christian metaphysics
Assuming that Christian metaphysics is inescapable
Assuming that there is always a single truth
Assuming that there is no truth at all, just power
Assuming that environmental ownership is singular and HG only
Compulsory Logocentrism
Historical materialism
Physionomistic Logocentrism
Privileging the singular faith of Para-Christian religion-ideology over textual incongruity
Worship of “secular” societal principles that are not upheld by the worshiping society
Worship of societal principles leading to organized/systematic sacrifice

Master-Slave Morality
Assuming that weakness equals bisected ontology
Assuming that weakness equals epistemological privilege
Assuming that weakness equals innocence
Assuming that weakness equals moral purity
Assuming that weakness equals right
Assuming that weakness equals righteousness
Assuming that weakness equals virtue
Assuming that Jewish and Christian, but not Muslim culture may be criticized
Assuming that only European imperialism/colonialism may be criticized
Assuming that only European physionomism may be criticized
Assuming that only European Fascism/Nazism may be criticized
Assuming that critical theory must only criticize European culture
Assuming that critical Europeans must only criticize European culture
Assuming that critical non-Europeans must only criticize culture
Assuming that critical Europeans must only criticize European religion
Assuming that critical non-Europeans must only criticize European religion
Assuming that critical Europeans must only criticize European ideology
Assuming that critical non-Europeans must only criticize European ideology
Demanding affection towards enemies
Egalitarian supremacism
Inverted Master Morality
Narcissistic Altruism
Narcissistic Egoism
Leftwing political advocacy of master morality in the name of slave morality
Rightwing political advocacy of slave morality in the name of master morality

Meritocracy
Assuming that blue-collar labor has less value than white-collar labor
Assuming that differences in socio-economic outcome are due entirely to prejudice and oppression
Assuming that differences in socio-economic outcome are entirely due to faulty morality
Assuming that humans are born into inherent equality which is distorted by immorality
Assuming that humans are born into inherent equality which is distorted by prejudice & oppression
Assuming that only blue-collar workers deserve to own their own labor
Assuming that only white-collar workers deserve to own their own labor
Assuming that white-collar labor has less value than blue-collar labor
Assuming that white-collar labor is “false consciousness”
Assuming that white-collar labor is parasitism
Demanding statistical equality in socio-economic outcome in the same human age cohort of fellow citizens
Liberal intellectual meritocracy
Marxist anti-intellectual meritocracy
Opposing socio-economic differences in outcome as sameness in outcome is seen as inherent
Structural economic rewarding of virtue

Message of Love
Peace movements
Pornography
Queer Pride
Queer sexuality
Romance novels
Secularized Christian salvation history in diplomacy
Secularized Christian salvation history in politics
Secularized Christian salvation history in popular culture
Sexuality of Equality

Messianic Universal Sameness (“redemption” through invoked metaphysical sameness)
Liberalism
Humanism
Marxism

Metaphysical Coercion
Compulsory supremacism
HSS privileges
Liberal essence
Marxist time
Secular sameness

Metaphysical Equality
Justifying statistic inequality with recourse to metaphysical equality
Justifying functional inequality with recourse to metaphysical equality
Justifying difference with metaphysical equality
Justifying erasure of difference with recourse metaphysical equality
Somatically Male Supremacism
Andro-Euroid-Adult Supremacism
White supremacism
HSS Supremacism (humanism)
Liberalism
Libertarianism
Marxism
Socialism

Metaphysical Experience
Assuming that one’s own experience is shared by everyone else in a particular situation
Assuming that particular forms of sexuality always constitute abuse
Selective vertical analytical categories, i.e. the incomplete short list of race, class, sex etc.
Ostensible HSS general experience
Privileged liberty
Universal suffering

Metaphysicalization 
Assuming that an alleged valuable core in religion-ideology is metaphysically Christian
Conspiracy theory
Inter-faith dialogue
Metaphysical research methodologies
Liberal Judaism (subordination of rabbinical textuality to Christian metaphysics)
Reduction of bio-ethics to Christian metaphysics (i.e. Bio-Dogmatism)
Reduction of economics to Christian metaphysics
Reduction of ethics to Christian metaphysics
Reduction of idealism to Christian metaphysics
Reduction of individuals to Christian metaphysics
Reduction of international law to Christian metaphysics
Reduction of philosophy to Christian metaphysics
Reduction of pluralism to Christian metaphysics
Reduction of progress to Christian metaphysics
Reduction of religion to Christian metaphysics
Reduction of representative government to Christian metaphysics
Reduction of science to Christian metaphysics
Reduction of sentience to Christian metaphysics
Reduction of sentient bodies to Christian metaphysics

Metaphysical Nihilism
Communism
Libertarianism
Nazism
Ungaism
Unscism

Metaphysical Parasitism
Industry of Evil
Gulags
Nazi concentration camps

Metaphysical secularism
Metaphysic-based ostensibly trans-religious politics
The religion/ideology dichotomy
The ideology/religion dichotomy

Military Metaphysics
Assuming that some wars are metaphysically just
Assuming that all wars are metaphysically unjust

Misomatic Equality (Equality in Somatic “Sameness”)
Apartheid
Assuming that nearly all adult citizens are cognitive equals in economic competition
Assuming that adult citizens must be made economic equals
Common consciousness
Continental sameness
Egalitarian somatic sameness
Exclusion from citizenship on account of functionality
HSS nature
Humanism
Physionomistic supremacism based on somatic sameness of the supremacist category
Privileging ostensible bodily similarity over equality in diversity
Reserving equality to arbitrary morphological similarity
Politics of physiology
Privileging somatic sameness over cognitive diversity
Privileging somatic sameness over somatic diversity

Missionary politics
Seeking political change by means changing political beliefs of individual citizens

Moderation (subjecting ideology-religion to Christian dogma)
Conservatism
Liberalism
Socialism

Modern Judaism (subjection to varying degrees of rabbinical Judaism to Christian metaphysics)
Chabad Judaism
Conservative Judaism
Humanist Judaism
Jewish Renewal
Liberal Judaism
“Messianic Judaism”
Modern Orthodox Judaism
Reconstructionist Judaism
Reform Judaism

Mono-dichotomy
Assuming that Para-Christian forms of Christian metaphysics are intrinsically dichotomously opposed to each other despite sharing the same Anti-Carnal Salvation history

Mono-Nationalism
Assuming a non-universal approach towards the issue of self-determination
Denying one’s territorial neighbor the self-determination that one retains for oneself
Denying one’s territorial neighbor the self-determination one seeks for oneself
Denying one’s territorial neighbor the type of things that one seeks for oneself
Denying other nations the type of things that one seeks for oneself
Denying other nations the type of things that one seeks for oneself
Denying other nations what retains for oneself
Restricting a certain nationalism to members of a singular ethnic group
Restricting a certain nationalism on account of taxonomy

Mono-truism
Believing that truth is always singular

Moral Supremacism
Assuming that clothes generally generates moral superiority
Assuming that culture generally generates moral superiority
Assuming that identity generally generates moral superiority
Assuming that intelligence generally generates moral superiority
Assuming that knowledge generally generates moral superiority
Assuming that skills generally generate moral superiority
Assuming that technology generally generates moral superiority
Assuming that claimed moral superiority is a license for acts of terrorism
Assuming that claimed moral superiority is a license for Anti-Jewish aversions
Assuming that claimed moral superiority is a license for Anti-Rom aversions
Assuming that claimed moral superiority is a license for deliberate ethnic murder
Assuming that claimed moral superiority is a license for dictatorship
Assuming that claimed moral superiority is a license for dysgenic murder of free PS
Assuming that claimed moral superiority is a license for extermination of legal innocent
Assuming that claimed moral superiority is a license for genocide
Assuming that claimed moral superiority is a license for long-term or mid-term incarceration
Assuming that claimed moral superiority is a license for totalitarianism
Assuming that claimed moral superiority is a license to eat others
Assuming that claimed moral superiority is a license to enslave others
Assuming that claimed moral superiority is a license to oppress others
Assuming that claimed moral superiority is a license to persecute others due to persuasion
Assuming that claimed moral superiority is a license to rule other nations against their will
Assuming that claimed moral superiority is a license to torture others for scientific purposes
Assuming that claimed universal gentile moral superiority voids Israeli self-defense
Assuming that claimed HG moral superiority justifies the Industry of Evil
Assuming that claimed gentile moral superiority justifies the use of all means against the Jews

Motherism 
Appropriating the semiotic markers of sex workers into hegemonic ideals of femininity
Exclusion of commercial sex workers from Femalehood
Inclusion of non-commercial idealist intra-matrimonial sex workers in Femalehood
Rejecting only the commercial aspects of non-coercive sex work

Multiurbism
Idealized ecumenical society
Idealized multicultural society
Idealized multiethnic society
Idealized intra-HG multi-taxonomic society
Idealized intra-European society
Idealized intra-“Aryan” society
Idealized intra-HSS society
Idealized adult society
Idealized separatist feminist society
Idealized free male society
Idealized internationalist society
Idealized intra-civilizational society
Idealized intra-secular society
Idealized “inter-religious” society
Idealized “inter-faith” society
Idealized inter-ideological society
Societal diversity unified by a common civic creed
Societal diversity unified by a common constitutional creed
Societal diversity unified by a common ideology

Mystery cults

Natural rights
Supremacist prerogatives justified through ascribed affiliation with bio-group

Nazicentrism – Negative Ideology
Claiming that the crimes of the Nazis constitute a secular metaphysical event
Claiming that the crimes of the Nazis should serve as a measure of all evil
Claiming that the crimes of the Nazis are unsurpassed in suffering
Claiming that the crimes of the Nazis are unsurpassed in scope
Claiming that the crimes of the Nazis are technologically unique
Claiming that the crimes of the Nazis are logistically unique
Claiming that the crimes of the Nazis are “ideologically” unique
Claiming that the crimes of the Nazis are legally unique
Claiming that Christianity of the time was the metaphysical opposite of Nazism
Claiming that Friedrich Nietzsche was proto-Nazi despite his virulent opposition to Anti-Semitism and German nationalism and his personal act of rescinding his Prussian citizenship and thus become stateless for the rest of his life after having settled in Switzerland
Claiming that the cruel murders committed by the Nazis constituted euthanasia
Claiming that the extermination of Europe’s cognitive elite constituted eugenics
Claiming that the extermination of the German intellectual elite constituted eugenics
Claiming that the killing of cognitively limited persons permanently incarcerated in sex-segregated German state institutions (where procreation was impossible) was eugenic
Claiming that Hitler was vegetarian despite regularly eating meat
Claiming that the Nazi regime supported animal rights despite their supporting scientific torture against both HG and other PS
Claiming that no insight of ex-Nazi thinkers should be considered in academic discourse
Claiming that everything written by Martin Heidegger and Paul de Man should be considered semiotically contaminated
Claiming that Christian-Secular humanist physionomistic supremacism is legitimate because it was not supported by the Nazis
Claiming that Jacques Derrida is semiotically contaminated because of his refusal to reduce to Nazism to everything ever written by Paul de Man and Martin Heidegger
Claiming that the Shoah was eugenic in nature despite the vastly higher average intelligence and far lower level of average psychopathy/crime in virtually all Jewish communities exterminated by the Nazis
Claiming that everything Israel does should be measured by the Shoah
Claiming that Zionism came about due to the Shoah
Claiming that Zionism sought independence due to the Shoah
Claiming that the Shoah is Zionism’s raison d’être
Claiming that the Shoah is Israel’s raison d’être
Claiming that Israel was created by White gentiles as a compensation to the Jewish victims of Nazism

Claiming that Israel was created by the non-binding and non-implemented proposed 1947 Partition Plan of UN General Assembly resolution 181
Claiming that Zionism received international legal legitimacy only after the Shoah
Claiming that the international recognition of Israel in 1948 can be fully reduced to the Shoah
Claiming that Palestinians are victims of the Shoah despite their leadership’s alliance with Nazi Germany and that leadership’s complete opposition to Jewish asylum from persecution before, during and after the Nazi extermination of Jews
Claiming that the Shoah perpetrated against the Jews was eugenic because it was preceded by eugenic sterilization of 400 000 “Aryans” diagnosed with hereditary somatic disorders
Claiming that the dysgenic Shoah perpetrated against the Jews of Europe and Tunisia was eugenic because it was preceded by economic mass killing of sex-segregated institutionalized German citizens with diagnosed (and some undiagnosed) functional limitations
Claiming that Nazis were White supremacists despite their officially held views that Mediterranean peoples were non-Aryans and that Slavic peoples were “sub-human”
Denying that there were hundreds of millions of non-HG PS murder victims of the Nazi regime, including the thousands of innocent individual non-HG PS incarcerated, subjected to scientific torture and murdered in Nazi German concentration camps such as Auschwitz and Buchenwald
Consistently ignoring that all instances of Nazi scientific torture against “sub-human” HG inmates were by law preceded by identical experimentation perpetrated against non-HG PS
Claiming that victims of Nazi crimes were solely HG
Claiming that victimization at the hands of the Nazis was an exclusively HSS experience
Claiming that Nazi victimization of Jews and other HG had no relationship with Nazi scientific torture perpetrated against other PS
Denying that the Nazi regime systematically violated, including by means of scientific torture what many decades later became known as animal rights
Claiming that purely verbal Nazi propaganda support for “animal welfare” means that the notion of non-HG PS rights, articulated many decades later is semiotically contaminated by Nazism
Claiming that Nazi German WWII crimes were generally worse than those committed by Japan during WWII
Claiming that veganism is somehow semiotically contaminated by Nazism despite the fact veganism was unknown in Nazi Germany as it was only articulated in the United Kingdom in 1944
Claiming that the philosophical notion of animal rights is somehow semiotically contaminated by Nazism despite this notion not being publically articulated until the 1970s
Claiming that the general practice of involuntary eugenic state sterilization of innocent HG was something particular to the Nazis despite the fact that this was practiced at the time in one way or another by most liberal democracies including in Norway as late as 1978
Claiming that universally emancipatory Anti-Humanism is semiotically contaminated by Communist/Nazi Anti-Humanism
Claiming that Jews generally are semiotically contaminated by Nazism on account of the Nazi extermination of a third of all rabbinical Jew
Claiming that Israelis generally are semiotically contaminated by Nazism on account of many Israelis having survived the Shoah before immigration to Israel
Claiming that Zionists generally are semiotically contaminated by Nazism due to the Nazi extermination of most Jewish Zionists in Europe
Claiming that Jews/Israelis/Zionists have been inspired by the Shoah in acts of warfare in response to military attacks against Jewish communities and Israeli territory
Claiming that Jews/Israelis/Zionists generally have been traumatized by Germans into becoming Nazis
Genocidal paradigm of the theory of genetic purity of recent singular African origin
Communism/Fascism dichotomy
Christianity/Nazism dichotomy
Liberalism/Nazism dichotomy
Fascism/Socialism dichotomy
Nazi/Humanist dichotomy
Assuming that contemporary Anti-Jewish aversions are legitimate as long as not reducible to historical Nazi Anti-Semitism
Assuming that contemporary Anti-Jewish defamation is legitimate as long as it is not reducible to historical Nazi Anti-Semitism
Anti-Zionism/Anti-Semitism dichotomy
Metaphysics/Relativism dichotomy
Arabism/Nazism dichotomy
Palestinism/Nazism dichotomy
Assuming that Humanism is non-prejudicial because Nazism is prejudicial
Assuming that Anti-Zionism is not prejudicial because Anti-Semitism is prejudicial
Assuming that failed Near Eastern genocides against the Jews are less serious than the Shoah

New Covenant
Assuming that ‘ideology’ is “metaphysically different” from ‘religion’
Assuming that ‘ideology’ replaces ‘religion’
Assuming that ‘ideology’ complements ‘religion’
Assuming that ‘ideology’ is superior to ‘religion’
Assuming that the ‘Old Testament’ nation has been superseded by a newer chosen nation
Libertarian eschatological reductionism (panacea of universal privatization)
Marxist eschatological determinism (panacea of universal socialization)
National constitutions
Replacement ideology
Replacement nationalism
Secular charity (Europeanization and Welfarization)
Secularism
Social contract
Universal treaties of law

New Time
Assumed end of medievalism
Christian imperialism
Enlightenment
Protestant Historical Narratives
Secularized Liberalism

Nivelization of social behavior

Numerical Para-Graphs

Onto-Species Morality
Assuming that HG are “bad by nature”
Assuming that HG are “good by nature”
Assuming that HG are entitled to claim rights for themselves that they deny to others
Assuming that some persons are “born free”
Assuming that some persons are “entitled” to “own” others
Assuming that those born into a state of abjection deserve that
Assuming that those born into a state of enslavement deserve that
Assuming that those “born unfree” do not deserve equality in liberty
Assuming that those “born unfree” do not deserve personhood
Assuming that only those “born free” are entitled to own objects and environments
Assuming that the enslaved receive what they deserve
Assuming that the enslaved deserve improved conditions of enslavement
Assuming that the indigent receive what they deserve
Assuming that the indigent deserve improved condition of indigence

Opposition to Multilingualism

Opposition to “the Inhuman”
Anti-Nazism
Nazism

Originalism
Assuming that the first representation is more than authoritative than subsequent “quotations”
Assuming that the first representation is more genuine than subsequent “references”
Assuming that the first representation is more real than subsequent “copies”
Assuming that the first representation is more valuable than subsequent “depictions”
Assuming that the first representation is more original than subsequent “readings”

Original sin
Assuming that guilt is hereditary
Assuming that guilt is ancestral

Orthodox deconstruction
Assuming that structures of Christian discourse are intrinsically universal
Assuming that the structures of deconstruction are intrinsically universal
Assuming that the experience of deconstruction is intrinsically universal
Deconstructive approval of Post-Christian transcendence

Paragraphical law (modeled on the enumeration of the “chapters” and “verses” of the Christian bible)

Parasitism Accusation
Aristocracy
Bourgeoisie
Capital owners
Clergy
Entrepreneurs
Haredim
Jews
Persons with diagnosed (and some undiagnosed) functional limitations
The poor

Peace movement

Phonocentrism
Assuming that other PS should remain non-emancipated for not speaking
Assuming that fetuses should remain non-emancipated for not speaking
Assuming that all legal minors should remain non-emancipated because some do not speak
Assuming that Deaf languages are not “real” languages
Assuming that Deaf community languages are not “real” ethnic languages
Assuming that languages of other PS are not “real” languages
Assuming that only HG, but not other PS are capable of electromagnetic communication
Assuming that other PS use of HG language is ontologically different from HG use
Assuming that other PS communication is “non-linguistic”
Assuming that other PS language use is ontologically different from HG language use
Assuming that legal minors “cannot speak for themselves”
Assuming that other PS “cannot speak for themselves”
Assuming that fetuses cannot speak for themselves
Assuming that other PS “have no language”
Assuming that other PS communication is “non-linguistic”
Assuming that all language use is reducible to Christian metaphysics  

Political Charity
Assuming that state charity justifies discrimination against beneficiaries
Assuming that state charity justifies disenfranchising beneficiaries
Assuming that state charity justifies oppressing beneficiaries
Assuming that state charity justifies exterminating beneficiaries
Assuming that state charity justifies restricting civic prerogatives of beneficiaries
Assuming that state charity justifies restricting physical mobility of beneficiaries
Assuming that state charity justifies bureaucratic discrimination against beneficiaries
Assuming that state charity justifies restricting equality of beneficiaries
Assuming that state charity justifies functional discrimination
Assuming that state charity justifies patronizing behavior towards beneficiaries
Assuming that state charity justifies “delaying” functional emancipation
Assuming that state charity justifies withholding functional emancipation
Assuming that state charity justifies rescinding parts of existing cognitive equality
Assuming that state charity to some justifies denying functional emancipation to others
Assuming that the diagnostically functionally limited constitute special interest groups
Assuming that Euroid bio-normativity supersedes cognitive equality

Political Homoeroticism
Fraternity
Sisterhoods and brotherhoods sublimate repressed somatic bisexuality

Political Logocentrism
Derivation of revelation from the ostensible center of universal truth

Political Ontology
Political claims that beliefs constitute reality in a pre-discursive sense

Political Public Processions

Political Teleology
Assuming that individual salvation teleologically precedes political world salvation
Political Eschatology
Political taboos deliberately designed to ward off future dangers
The assumption that the present is subordinate to the future

Principium in absurdum
Unethical unlimited application of specific principles irrespective of unintended consequences

Privileging belief
Considering world ideologies to constitute non-religion
Fighting false consciousness
Nihilism
Opinion
Perspective
Political parties
Relativism
Secular consensus
Social constructionism
Standpoint

Privileging cloistered organizations as opposed to other organizations

Privileging Greek and Latin words for formation of scientific terminology

Privileging ontology within Para-Christian metaphysics

Progressive time
Assuming that “progress” is inevitable
Assuming that the present is intrinsically superior to the past in every respect
Assuming that “progress” always wins eventually

Projection of Christian Metaphysics
Claiming to oppose “the real Judaism”
Claiming to oppose “the real Islam”
Para-Christian physionomistic projection

Protest[ant]ism
Ritual protests
Critical theory
Liberal democracy
Open society
Secular iconoclasm

Public Blasphemy

Public Confession

Radical Feminism
“Secular” Homo Christianus
Negative male idealization
Claiming that somatic HSS females must not reveal too much or too little of their bodies in public
Opposition to sexual representation of any kind
Believing that sexuality is the source of all evil
Claiming that heterosexually abstentious Euroid legally adult females have access to metaphysical female experience

Redemptive Discipline
Conservatism
Fascism
Islamism
Liberalism
Marxism

Reformation
Assuming that the law of the land should be elaborated rather than simplified  
Assuming that the law of the land should be elongated rather than shortened
Claiming that the indefensible should be reformed rather than ended

Religiocentrism
Assuming that “religion” is generally more faith-based than “ideology”
Assuming that divinity distinguishes “religion” from ideology
Assuming that metaphysical “ideology” is more rational than non-metaphysical “religion”
Assuming that “religion” and “ideology” are metaphysically distinct from each other
Assuming that Karl Marx was in favor of “ideology”
Assuming that one must only criticize “one’s own” religion as opposed to those of others
Assuming that all religions are equally morally worthy
Assuming that all religions share a single ethics
Assuming that religions should be above criticism
Assuming that non-metaphysical religious thought is generally bad in politics
Assuming that metaphysical ideological thought is good in politics
Centering political doctrine around belief and/or disbelief
Claiming that “religion” must be accorded disproportionately more respect than “ideology”
Claiming that “ideology” and “religion” must be judged by double standards
Claiming that “religion” must be treated differently from other “ideology”
Claiming that “ideology” must be treated differently from other “religion”
Claiming that one must not criticize particular religions other than one’s own
Claiming that religions of others must only must only be criticized as “universal religion”
Assuming that one must either support or oppose religion “generally”
Assuming that religions are ethically uniform
Assuming that religions are moral equals
Assuming that all religions have equal worth
Assuming that all religions are founded on the same metaphysics
Assuming “religion” must be judged by more lenient political standards than “ideology”
Assuming “ideology” must be judged by more lenient philosophical standards than “religion”
Assuming “Enlightenment” must be judged by more lenient standards than “religion”
Assuming “sanity” must be judged by more lenient epistemological standards than “insanity”
Assuming HG must be judged by more lenient epistemological standards than other PS
Claiming that “religion” should be privileged in the private sphere
Claiming that “ideology” should be privileged in the public sphere
Claiming that “religion” should be banned from the public sphere
Claiming that “ideology” should be banned from the private sphere
Assuming that “religion” should be respected for being irrational
Assuming that “ideology” should be respected for being Para-Christian
Assuming that “religion” should be respected for describing itself as “sacred”
Assuming that “religion” should be respected for describing itself as “holy”
Assuming that “ideology” should be respected for being disputed
Assuming that “religion” should be respected for being disputed
Assuming that “ideology” should be respected for being “consensual”
Assuming that “religion” should be respected for being “consensual”
Assuming that “ideology” should be respected for being “communal”
Assuming that “religion” should be respected for being “communal”
Assuming that “religion” should be respected for “elected”
Assuming that “ideology” should be respected for being “elected”
Assuming that “religion” should be respected for being “revealed”
Assuming that “ideology” should be respected for “revealing” competing “ideologies”
Assuming that “ideology” should be respected for “replacing” “religion”
Assuming that “ideology” should be respected for being “faith-based”
Assuming that “religion” should be respected for being “faith-based”
Assuming that “ideology” is rational because it is atheist
Assuming that “ideology” is rational because it is agnostic
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “rational” by abandoning belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “rational” by denouncing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “rational” be divorcing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “secular” by abandoning belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “secular” by denouncing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “secular” by divorcing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “legitimate” by abandoning belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “legitimate” by denouncing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “legitimate” by divorcing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “ethical” by abandoning belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “ethical” by denouncing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “ethical” by divorcing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “true” by abandoning belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “true” by denouncing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “true” by divorcing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “enlightened” by abandoning belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “enlightened” by denouncing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “enlightened” by divorcing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “universal” by abandoning belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “universal” by denouncing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “universal” by divorcing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “political” by abandoning belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “political” by denouncing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “political” by divorcing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “ideological” by abandoning belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “ideological” by denouncing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “ideological” by denouncing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “just” by abandoning belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “just” be denouncing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “just” by divorcing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “irreligious” by abandoning belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “irreligious” by denouncing belief in divinity
Assuming that Christian metaphysics becomes “irreligious” by divorcing belief in divinity
Assuming that “religion” is intrinsically good
Claiming that bad religious things are deviation from “true” religion
Claiming that all religions are intrinsically “good”
Assuming that “religion” is ethical at its core
Claiming that all religions have “the same message”
Assuming that all religions are founded on Christian metaphysics
Assuming that all religions share the same
Assuming that new religions are bad
Assuming that old religions are good
Assuming that religion of others must be accorded respect not given to ideologies of others
Assuming that one must not make religion the target of humor
Assuming that one must not make religion the target of satire
Assuming that one must not make religion the target of irony
Assuming that one must not make religion the target of artistic provocation
Assuming that one must not make religion the target of parody
Assuming that one must revere all art
Assuming that one must revere liberal democracy
Assuming that everything that goes beyond liberal democracy is bad
Assuming that one must never go beyond liberal democracy
Assuming that one must revere the dogma of liberal democracy
Assuming that one must revere all religions
Assuming that one must revere religions of others
Assuming that one must only criticize one’s own religion
Assuming that one must not criticize religions of others
Assuming that one must revere humanism due to it being ostensibly external to religion
Assuming that one must revere secularism due to it being ostensibly external to religion
Assuming that one must revere liberalism due to it ostensibly being external to religion
Assuming that one must revere the shared Christian metaphysics of “political ideology”
Assuming that ideological metaphysics is good and religious metaphysics is bad
Christian determination of what constitutes “true Islam”
Secular determination of what constitutes “true Islam”
Non-Muslim determination of what constitutes “true Islam”
Liberal determination of what constitutes “true Islam”
Socialist determination of what constitutes “true Islam”
External determination of what constitutes “true Islam”
Anti-Islamic determination of what constitutes “true Islam”
Christian determination of what constitutes “true Hinduism”
Secular determination of what constitutes “true Hinduism”
Non-Hindu determination of what constitutes “true Hinduism”
Liberal determination of what constitutes “true Hinduism”
Socialist determination of what constitutes “true Hinduism”
External determination of what constitutes “true Hinduism”
Anti-Hindu determination of what constitutes “true Hinduism”
Christian determination of what constitutes “true Judaism”
Secular determination of what constitutes “true Judaism”
Non-Jewish determination of what constitutes “true Judaism”
Liberal determination of what constitutes “true Judaism”
Socialist determination of what constitutes “true Judaism”
External determination of what constitutes “true Judaism”
Anti-Jewish determination of what constitutes “true Judaism”
Claiming that external representation of religion should idealize
Claiming that external representation of religion should only mention commendable aspects
Assuming that academic representation of religion should idealize
Assuming that academic representation of religion should only mention commendable aspects
Assuming that journalistic representation of religion should idealize
Assuming that journalistic representation of religion should only mention commendable aspects
Assuming that political representation of religion should idealize
Assuming that political representation of religion should only mention the commendable
Assuming that bad aspects of religion are mere “abuse” of the “good” aspects
Assuming that bad aspects of religion are abuse of “the name” of a particular religion
Assuming that bad aspects of religion are external to religion
Assuming that bad aspects of religion are non-intrinsic
Assuming that good aspects of religion are intrinsic
Assuming that [Christian] metaphysics is common to all traditional religion
Assuming that [Christian] Humanism is common to all traditional religion
Assuming that [Christian] Secularism is common to all religious cultures
Assuming that [Christian] science is common to all cultures
Assuming that [Christian] Socialism is common to all cultures
Assuming that [Christian] Conservatism is common to all cultures
Faith-based Socialist salvation
Faith-based Fascist salvation
Faith-based Liberal salvation
Claiming that opponents of Christianity are secular while opponents of Islam are Islamophobic
Assuming that major non-Christian religion is legitimate because it is distinct from Christianity
Assuming that religion must only be externally criticized or opposed as a universal cross-civilizational abstraction and not as particular practices specific to particular societal discourses
Assuming that “religion” must only be criticized as metaphysical “universal religion”
Assuming that only Christian culture (as opposed to other religious cultures) should be subject of universal critique by both Christians and non-Christians
Assuming that only Muslim culture (as opposed to other religious cultures) should be subject of universal critique by Muslims and non-Muslims
Assuming that only Jewish culture (as opposed to other religious cultures) should be subject of universal critique by Jews and non-Jews alike
Assuming that only Hindu culture (as opposed to other religious cultures) should be subject of universal critique by Hindus and non-Hindus alike
Assuming that only Christian civilization (as opposed to other civilizations) should be subject of universal critique by both Christians and non-Christians
Assuming that only Muslim civilization (as opposed to other civilizations) should be subject of universal critique by Muslims and non-Muslims
Assuming that only Jewish civilization (as opposed to other civilizations) should be subject of universal critique by Jews and non-Jews alike
Assuming that only Hindu civilization (as opposed to other civilizations) should be subject of universal critique by Hindus and non-Hindus alike
Assuming that only Marxist civilization (as opposed to other civilizations) should be subject of universal critique by Socialists and non-Socialists alike
Assuming that only Liberal civilization (as opposed to other civilizations) should be subject of universal critique by Liberals and non-Liberals alike
Assuming that only Islamist civilization (as oppose to other civilizations) should be subject of universal critique by Muslims and non-Muslims alike
Assuming that only Fascist civilization (as opposed to other civilizations) should be subject to universal critique by Fascists and non-Fascists alike
Assuming that criticism of non-Christian religion should be limited to phenomena also found in Christianity
Assuming that Christianity should form the basis of “criticism of religion”
Assuming that Christianity should form the basis of “criticism of Judaism”
Assuming that Christianity should form the basis of “criticism of Islam”
Assuming that traditional “religions” generally are both ethical and equally so
Assuming that religion must not be criticized
Assuming that particular religions must not be criticized
Assuming that everyone must respect “the sanctity” of religion generally
Assuming that democratization cannot ever succeed anywhere in the Muslim world
Assuming that democratization cannot ever fail anywhere in the Muslim world
Assuming that Muslims per se are naturally non-disposed for democratization
Assuming that Muslims per se are naturally disposed for democratization
Assuming that Muslims can only elect enemies of open society
Assuming that Muslims cannot elect enemies of open society
Assuming that democratization in the Muslim world must happen instantly
Assuming that democratization in the Muslim world must take hundreds of years
Assuming that no Muslims are enemies of open society
Assuming that all Muslims are enemies of open society
Assuming that only Islamists can win elections in Muslim countries
Assuming that Islamists cannot win elections in Muslim countries
Assuming that Islamists are intrinsically incapable of winning elections in the Muslim world
Assuming that Islamists are intrinsically incapable of losing elections in Muslim countries
Assuming that democratization in Muslim countries only requires holding free and fair elections

Replacement Ideology – Supersessionist Ideology
Ideology of salvation that claims to replace other belief system of salvation
Libertocentrism
Teaching-Persuasion that claims to replace religion
Teaching-Persuasion that claims to be separate from religion

Replacement Idiom
Assuming that a national standard language should replace dialect
Assuming that a national standard language should replace ethnolect
Assuming that a national standard language should replace hybridolect
Assuming that a national standard language should replace slang
Assuming that a national standard language should replace sociolect
Assuming that a national standard language should replace another majority language
Assuming that dialect words should be kept out of the standard language
Assuming that ethnolect words should be kept out of the standard language
Assuming that hybridolect words should be kept out of the standard language
Assuming that slang words should be kept out of the standard language
Assuming that sociolect words should be kept out of the standard language
Assuming that loanwords should be kept out of the standard language
Assuming that dialect syntax should be kept out of the standard language
Assuming that ethnolect syntax should be kept out of the standard language
Assuming that hybridolect syntax should be kept out of the standard language
Assuming that slang syntax should be kept out of the standard language
Assuming that sociolect syntax should be kept out of the standard language
Assuming that syntax loaned from other languages should be kept out
Assuming that dialect pronunciation should be replaced by standard pronunciation
Assuming that ethnolect pronunciation should be replaced by standard pronunciation
Assuming that hybridolect pronunciation should be replaced by standard pronunciatio
Assuming that slang pronunciation should be replaced by standard pronunciation
Assuming that sociolect pronunciation should be replaced by standard pronunciation
Assuming that pronunciation influenced by other languages should be replaced by standard pronunciation
Assuming that dialect accent should be replaced by standard accent
Assuming that ethnolect accent should be replaced by standard accent
Assuming that hybridolect accent should be replaced by standard accent
Assuming that slang accent should be replaced by standard accent
Assuming that sociolect accent should be replaced by standard accent
Assuming that accent influenced by other language(s) should be replaced by standard accent

Replacement Nationalism – Supersessionist Nationalism
Assuming that another people is now chosen by destiny in place of the Jews
Denying other nations the sovereignty one seeks for one’s own nation
Denying other nations the sovereignty one reserves for one’s own nation

Reprocentrism
Considering non-reproductive sex as “minorities”
Considering non-reproductive sex as “paraphilia”
Iconoclastic taboo sex (arousal by iconoclasm)
Sexual “Queerness”
Sin sex (arousal by “sinning”)

“Return” to uncontaminated pre-fall “true humanity”
Dictatorship of the proletarians
Unequal metaphysical equality

Revolution of Discourse
Culture of Dispute
Culture of Protest
Opposition to clericalism
Opposition to discrimination
Opposition to dogma
Opposition to inconsistent standards
Opposition to oppressive discourse
Opposition to oppressive practice
Opposition to tyranny
Universal claims

Sacrificial Consumption of Jesuis/Jewsus/Schwartsus on behalf of Universal Man  
Beating Jesus
Breeding Jesus for factory farming
Breeding Jesus for killing
Breeding Jesus for profit
Caging Jesus
Casting the net on Jesus
Chaining Jesus
Commercial impregnation of Jesus
Drinking Jesus
Gassing Jesus
Enslaving Jesus
Eating Jesus
Entertainment at the expense of captive Jesus
Experimenting on Jesus
Exterminating Jesus
Fishing for Jesus
Hunting Jesus
Genetic mal-modification of Jesus for financial gain
Incarcerating Jesus
Killing Jesus because of her somatic sex
Killing Jesus for dinner
Killing Jesus for fun
Killing Jesus for her hair-fur
Milking Jesus for profit
Owning Jesus
Selling JesusSuffocating Jesus
Telling Jesus to respect evil because of its ostensible legality
Telling Jesus to turn the other cheek
Torturing Jesus
Using Jesus as slave labor
Violently raping Jesus
Wearing Jesus’ skin as clothes

Sacrificial Suffering by Proxy 
Anti-LGBTQ legal discrimination
Anti-Youth legal discrimination
Anti-Polyamory legal discrimination
Erasure of false consciousness from “common consciousness”
Imposed individual medical suffering on account of Para-Christian Dogma
Military conscription
Military self-sacrifice
Scientific torture
One-way “sharing” of suffering between HG and other PS
Torture on account of religion-ideology
Torture by sentenced incarceration

Satanism
Assuming that truth emerges through dichotomous opposition to Christianity
Anti-Christian blasphemy intended to provoke, shock and offend
Carnivals
Commercial Madonnas
Doctrinal Egoism
Experiencing pleasure from contradicting Christianity
Idiocism
Inverting Agape/Eros into Eros/Agape
Laissez-faire capitalism
Pornography
Satanist Era (Modernity, including Post-Modernity)
Secularism
Sin Centers
Taboo Inversion/Inverted Context

Secular Baptism
Enforced assimilation of criminals into law-abiding society
Enforced assimilation of youth into law-abiding society
Enforced assimilation of religious minorities into religiously majoritarian society
Enforced assimilation of ethnic minorities into ethnically majoritarian society
Enforced assimilation of national minorities into nationally majoritarian society
Enforced assimilation of linguistic minorities into linguistically majoritarian society
Enforced assimilation of legal adult females into androcentric society
Enforced assimilation of the LGBTQ community into sexually majoritarian society
Enforced assimilation of the mentally ill into mentally majoritarian society

Secular Charity
Europeanization (“developmental aid”)
Welfarization (subjection instead of emancipation)

Secular Churches
Church organizations in the guise of “international organizations”
Church organizations in the guise of “political parties”
Church organizations in the guise of political “movements”
Church organizations in the guise of “electoral forms of government”
Electoral kingdom
Electoral empire
Inversion of the ascribed dichotomy of religion/ideology into ideology/religion
Patercracy – the rule of elected fathers
The Absolute Jurisdiction Principle
The Anti-Censorship Principle
The Electoral Assembly Principle
The One Cardinal One Vote Principle
The Confidentially Principle
The One Elected Supreme Father Principle
The Public Exorcism Principle
The Secret Ballot Principle
The One Truth Principle (monotruism)

Secular Cloister Gardens 

Secular Cloisters
Barracks
Governmental totalitarianism
Gulag
Hospital
Kibbutz
Mental hospital
Metaphysical Enclosure
Nation state
Prison
School
University/college

Secular Confession

Secular Conversion
Educating the public to choose “an ideology” in addition to “religion”
Educating pupils to choose “an ideology” in addition to “religion”
Claiming that solutions to political issues generally are reducible to ostensible dichotomies between “ideologies”
Funding public efforts at promoting “choice of ideology”

Secular Discipline  

Secular Dogmatism

Secular Economics
Using government economic tools to consistently enforce Christian notions of morality
Using state government economic tools to consistently enforce Para-Christian notions of morality

Secular Enforced Conversion
Enforcing minority use of majority language
Enforcing minority adaption of majority national identity
Enforcing minority adaption of majority religious culture
Enforcing minority sexual practices to conform to majority norms

Secular Enforced Sexual Minor Celibacy

Secular Exceptionalism
Gentile Judeocentrism
Replacement Nationalism
Addition Nationalism
Replacement Ideology
Addition Ideology

Secular Hamartiology
Critical theory

Secular Hell
Concentration camps
Extermination camps
Forced conscription
Forced labor camps
Industrialized killing
Industry of Evil
Plantation enslavement
Scientific torture

Secular Ideology
Ostensibly post-religious movements of salvation
Secular interpretation in absurdum

Secularism
Privileging Christendom over Christianity
Privileging the Para-Christian over Christianity
Privileging the Para-Christian over “the non-European”
Para-Christian semiotic supremacism
Privileging ‘ideology’ over ‘religion’
Sacralization by means of detachment from another religion-ideology

Secular metaphysics

Secular missionaries
Development aid workers
Electoral activists
Ideological activists
Salespersons
Spokespersons

Secular Natural Privilege
Assuming that “Nature” gives every privilege to “Man” while nothing to itself
Physionomistic privilege  

Secular Patrology 
Ascription of intrinsic salvational quality to texts of particular “secular” thinkers
Foundations of Discursivity
Founding fathers
Secular hagiography

Secular Philosophy

Secular Power
American
Anti-Jewish (Anti-Judaism, Anti-Semitism, Anti-Zionism and Anti-Israel respectively)
Aryan
Civilized
Communist
Conservative
Developed
Diplomatic
Enlightened
Epistemological
Ethical
European
Human
Humane
Humanist
Humanitarian
International
Liberal
Medical
Metaphysical
Modern
National
Nationalist
Nazi
Neutral
Non-violent
Normal
Objective
Ontological
Pacifist
Philosophical
Progressive
Rational
Reasonable
Religious
Revolutionary
Scientific
Secular
Secularist
Socialist
Transatlantic
Universal
Western
White

Secular Profanation

Secular Proselytization

Secular Sacrament
Accepting “Adulthood” on time!
Compulsory homework for pupils
Compulsory schooling
Chronological retirement
Secular Christian humanism
Secular Christian salvation history
Compulsory military service
Escape from the flesh
Euroid bio-normativity
HSS privileges
Hum-unity
Loyal opposition
Patriotism
Paying taxes
Political dichotomies
Secular Baptism
Somatic metaphysical equality
Voting

Secular sacrifice
Describing common interests among bio-categories of sentience as conflict of interest
Describing common interest among sentient individuals as conflict of interest
Dichotomous counter-posing of categories of sentient persons against each other
Hypothetical sacrificial “dilemma”
Philosophical sacrifice

Secular Saints
Assassinated politicians subjected to secular sacralization after death
Dictators
Founders of Discursivity
Kings/Queens with reigning royal families
Totalitarian Dictators

Secular Salvation

Secular salvation history
Linear time and ultimate individual salvation through personal accumulated virtue

Secular semiotic supremacism 
Assuming that all aspects of Euro-Christian culture must be emulated by non-Euroid HG
Assuming that all Euro-Christian economic practices must be emulated by non-Euroid HG
Assuming that all Euro-Christian social institutions must be emulated by non-Euroid HG
Assuming that Euro-Christian society is advanced because of its experience with Nazism
Assuming that Euro-Christian society is moral because of its rejection of historical Nazism
Assuming that political liberty is a intrinsically Euro-Christian
Assuming that liberal democracy must be based on Christian metaphysics
Assuming that learning about political liberty is a Euro-Christian one-way process
Assuming that Euro-Christian society is superior because it is wealthy
Assuming that mostly non-Euroid nations must evolve in the spirit of Europe
Assuming that Euroids better understand conflict resolution than non-Euroids
Assuming that Euroids has access to superior knowledge with regard to peace-making
Assuming that present mostly Euroid nations are a light onto other nations in every respect
Assuming that societal development is intrinsically a process of imitation of Europeans
Assuming that Euroid wealth requires non-Euroid societal imitation of Euroids
Assuming that Euroids universally understand the best interests of non-Euroids
Assuming that secular political ideology must be founded on Christian metaphysics
Assuming that ‘ideology’ is intrinsically superior to ‘religion’
Assuming that political materialism is true because of what it opposes

Secular Space 
Ascribing intrinsic meaning to units of Christian geography
Ascribing metaphysical foundation to units of Christian geography
The founding of “secular politics” on Christian understanding of geography

Secular Theo-Inferiorization
Anti-Anthropomorphism with regard to HG perception of other PS
Pro-Theomorphism with regard to intra-HG perception
Mono-Anthropism (HG assumptions that other HG individuals are “the same”)’
Onto-theology

Secular Transcendence

Secular Universalization
Ascribing universal reach to one’s own values/prejudices

Secular Virginity
Anal Virginity
Commercial Virginity
Minor Virginity
Oral Virginity
Representational Virginity
Semiotic Virginity
Tactile Virginity
Visual Virginity

Seeking the only truth
Assuming that a single truth can always be discovered if sought with enough dedication
´
Separation of executive and moral power

Sexduality
Assuming that cognitive sex is reducible to somatic sex
Assuming that somatic sex is reducible to cognitive sex
Assuming that sexuality must always be defined by somatic sex
Assuming that somatic sex must always be defined by sexuality
Assuming that sexualities defined by other aspects than somatic sex must be condemned
Assuming that somatic sex is ontologically privileged over other aspects of sexuality
Assuming that somatic sex should be epistemologically privileged over other aspects of sexuality
Privileging definitions of sexuality founded on somatic sex
Privileging somatic sex over cognitive sex

Sexual Iconoclasm
Opposition to legally adult pornography
Opposition to legally minor pornography
Opposition to intergenerational pornography
Opposition to interspecies pornography
Opposition to legally adult erotica
Opposition to legally minor erotica
Opposition to intergenerational erotica
Opposition to interspecies erotica
Opposition to polymorphous erotica
Opposition to somatically heterosexual pornography
Opposition to somatically homosexual pornography
Opposition to polymorphous pornography
Opposition to “sexual abuse” of cartoon figures
Opposition to “sexual abuse” of “family pictures”
Opposition to “sexual abuse” of nude images that depict only legal minors
Opposition to “sexual abuse” of computer files
Opposition to “sexual abuse” of cameras
Opposition to “sexual abuse” of written texts
Opposition to “sexual abuse” of web pages
Opposition to “sexual abuse” of semiotic contamination
Opposition to “sexual abuse” of Internet chats
Opposition to “sexual abuse” of webcams
Opposition to “sexual abuse” of text messages
Opposition to “sexual abuse” of telephones
Opposition to “sexual abuse” of books
Opposition to “sexual abuse” of magazines
Opposition to “sexual abuse” of mail
Opposition to “sexual abuse” electronic mail
Opposition to “sexual abuse” of love letters
Opposition to electronic “sexual abuse”
Opposition to digital “sexual abuse”
Opposition to artistic “sexual abuse”
Opposition to pedagogic “sexual abuse”
Opposition to political “sexual abuse”
Opposition to printed “sexual abuse”
Opposition to virtual “sexual abuse”
Opposition to semiotic “sexual abuse”
Opposition to literary “sexual abuse”
Claiming that the same youth nudie picture is illegal to one person and legal to another
Claiming that a legal minor image becomes illegal in case of individual viewer arousal
Claiming that illegality/legality of sexual representation is individually dependent on arousal
Claiming that illegality/legality of sexual representation is group dependent on alleged arousal
Claiming that depiction of legal minors becomes individually illegal with ascribed arousal
Claiming that depiction of legal minors becomes individually illegal with viewer identity
Claiming that depiction of legal minors becomes individually illegal with viewer preference
Claiming that depiction of legal minors becomes individually illegal with viewer diagnosis
Claiming that depiction of legal minors becomes individually illegal with assumed arousal
Claiming that depiction of legal minors becomes illegal with unproven arousal.
Claiming that depiction of legal minors becomes illegal with ascribed author arousal
Claiming that depiction of legal minors becomes illegal with author viewer identity
Claiming that depiction of legal minors becomes illegal with author preference
Claiming that depiction of legal minors becomes illegal with author diagnosis
Claiming that depiction of legal minors becomes illegal with assumed author arousal
Claiming that depiction of legal minors becomes illegal with unproven author arousal
Claiming that depiction of legal minors becomes illegal with unproven author arousal
Claiming that depiction of a fictional minor becomes individually illegal with ascribed arousal
Claiming that depiction of a fictional minor becomes illegal with viewer group identity
Claiming that depiction of a fictional minor becomes illegal with viewer preference
Claiming that depiction of a fiction minor becomes illegal with viewer identity
Claiming that depiction of a fictional minor becomes illegal with viewer preference
Claiming that depiction of a fictional minor becomes illegal with assumed viewer diagnosis
Claiming that depiction of a fictional minor becomes illegal with assumed arousal
Claiming that depiction of a fictional minor becomes illegal with unproven arousal
Claiming that depiction of a fictional minor becomes illegal with ascribed author arousal
Claiming that depiction of a fictional minor becomes illegal with author identity
Claiming that depiction of a fictional minor becomes illegal with author group affiliation
Claiming that depiction of a fictional minor becomes illegal with author preference
Claiming that depiction of a fictional minor becomes illegal with author diagnosis
Claiming that depiction of a fictional minor becomes illegal with assumed author arousal
Claiming that depiction of a fictional minor becomes illegal with unproven author arousal
Claiming that depiction of a fictional minor becomes illegal with unproven author arousal
Claiming that legally adult pornography inspires sex crimes
Claiming that heterosexual pornography inspires sex crimes
Claiming that homosexual pornography inspires sex crimes
Claiming that other PS pornography inspires sex crimes
Claiming that legally minor pornography inspires sex crimes
Claiming that sexual depiction constitutes intrinsic abuse
Claiming that legally adult sexual depiction constitutes intrinsic abuse
Claiming that heterosexual sexual depiction constitutes intrinsic abuse
Claiming that homosexual sexual depiction constitutes intrinsic abuse
Claiming that other PS sexual depiction constitutes intrinsic abuse
Claiming that legally minor sexual depiction constitutes intrinsic abuse
Claiming that same-age sexual depiction constitutes intrinsic abuse
Claiming that similar-age sexual depiction constitutes intrinsic abuse

Similarism
Compulsory education
Demanding Para-Christian standardization of societal standards
Fascism
Military discipline

Sin Centers
Adult movie theaters
Amsterdam “coffee shops” (i.e. where cannabis is semi-legally sold)
Bars
BDSM dungeons
Brothels
Discos
LGBTQI Pride Parades
Liquor stores
Nightclubs
Pornsites
Prostitution streets
Pubs
Red-light districts
Saloons
Sex clubs
Sex shops
Slutwalks
Smoking areas
Strip clubs
Swinger clubs
Taverns

Social Constructivism
Assuming that HG personality can be improved by altering “sinful” environment
Assuming that HG personality can be improved by leaving “false religion”
Assuming that HG personality can be improved by adoption of doctrinal individual faith

Social contract

Social justice

Sovereign tyranny
Assuming that only some peoples are entitled to self-determination
Denying others self-determination
51% tyranny over 49%
Governmental acceptance of the Industry of Evil
Negation of universal emancipation
Penological torture of incarceration
Secular Presidential Monarchy by the Grace of Nation
Recognized dictatorship
Sovereign physionomism

Spiritual Israel
Continuism
Denigration of Flesh
Fascism
Humanism
Liberalism
Nationalism
Para-Christian Supremacism
Sameness-based HG rights
Sameness-based PS rights
Socialism
Structural Feminism

Structural privilege given to Christian sin in political discourse
The tacit assumption that post-religious politics is based on a universal Christian imperative
Consistent subordination of executive power to moral power

Subhumanism
Assuming that bio-categories of sentient persons can be murdered, oppressed, enslaved, tortured and discriminated against due to ostensibly being “inferior” to bio-normative individuals

Subjectism
Assuming that “healthy” sexuality is limited to purely reproductive desire
Assuming that “healthy” sexuality is limited to moral desire between proper political subjects
Assuming that sexual desire leading to “distress and impairment” is only pathological if not morally “inter-subjective” among recognized subjects
Binary sexuality
Dichotomous sexuality
Exclusive sexuality
Feminist Anti-Objectification
Phallocentrism
Assuming that sexual desires of sexual minors and other PS do not really count, must not be taken seriously and should hence not become part of scientific sexual classification
Assuming that sexual desires of other PS and sexual minors towards sexual adults are not proper in the sense that sexual reciprocation causes semiotic contamination
Sexduality
Privileging gender over other aspects of sexuality

Subsidiarity

Sunday as unquestioned day of rest

Supplement dichotomy
Addition
Replacement

Supremacist Tabula Rasa
Liberalism
Marxism    

Taboo Inversion – Inverted Context
Anti-Pornography Feminism
Female icons of love
Feminist opposition to voluntary natural insemination
Inverted sacrilege
Modern Art
Politics of Charity
Politics of Love
Politics of Sex
Pornography
Secular iconoclasm
Sexualized advertisement

The New
Fashion
News
Proliferation of the new
Worship of the New that “replaces” the Old
Worship of replacement

The Other
Claiming that “the other” is intrinsically HG
Claiming that “the other” is intrinsically incompatible with Judaic identification
Claiming that “the other” is intrinsically gentile
Claiming that “the other” is intrinsically morally superior

The Post-Moral Condition
The displacement and confounding of morality with prejudicial interpretation of law
The tacit notion that morality should be derived from legislation and not the other way around

Typology
Claiming that Western culture is Antitype of other cultures
Claiming to be Antitype (opposite) of others
The scientific quest for uncovering of “structure” in all fields of existence
Western projective misunderstanding of other cultures

Unequal Liberty
Adult rights
Apartheid
Assuming that liberty is metaphysically divorced from the individual capability of its exercise
Assuming that only HG may hold property
Assuming that the world belongs to HG only
Disability bureaucracy
Discrimination in legal discourses
Equality before the law contingent on ability to pay legal expenses
Equality before the law contingent on legal age status
Equality before the law contingent on citizenship status
Equality before the contingent on prior conviction
Equality before the law contingent on religious status
Equality before the law contingent on sex status
Equality before the law contingent on taxonomic status
Equal property rights contingent on degree of property ownership if any
Granting self-determination to some nations but not to others
HSS privileges
HSS universalism
Illusory principles rhetorically affirmed but mostly non-applied
Liberty and rights contingent on property ownership or lack thereof
Liberty and rights limited by bio-category per se
Liberty and rights subject to exclusionary functional limitation
Personhood denied to entire categories of sentient individuals
Positive liberty
The notion that private property trumps almost everything else
The notion that state property trumps almost everything else
The notion that there cannot be legal equality between state and individual
The notion that there must not be legal equality between state and individual

Universal Sameness

Uniqueness
Assuming that the first representation remains unique
Assuming that Christian concepts are uniquely universal
Assuming that Christian ideas are uniquely universal
Assuming that Christian myths are uniquely universal
Assuming that Christian notions are uniquely universal
Assuming that “Aryans” are unique
Assuming that “Humans” are unique
Assuming that “Men” are unique
Assuming that “Whites” are unique
Assuming that Christian Weltanschauung is uniquely universal
Assuming that Humanist Weltanschauung is uniquely universal
Assuming that Secular Weltanschauung is uniquely universal
Externally assuming that Jews are unique
Externally assuming that Israel is unique
Internally assuming that a particular predominantly Christian nation is unique

Universal Sameness of Common Cognition
Assuming that there is a general natural condition of dichotomy between HG cognition and all other PS cognition
Common consciousness (Marxism)
Common nature (Liberalism)
Disembodied consciousness (denial of cognitive biodiversity within the Homo genus)
Exclusive cognition (negation of variously constituted cognitive equality between HG and other PS)
Seeking to impose one’s own pedagogic preferences on unwilling others with different pedagogic preferences

Urbocentrism
Assuming that “civilization” (urban culture) is intrinsically superior to all other societies
Assuming that rural language is intrinsically inferior to urban language

Urboholism
Communism
Democracy
Fascism

Victimology
Assuming that coitus generally constitutes victimization
Assuming that all illegal inter-generation sexual intimacy constitutes victimization
Assuming that all members of oppressed categories are oppressed
Assuming that all members of oppressive categories are oppressive
Trauma culture (parallel to honor culture)
Vertical analytical categories

X-mas
Annual compulsory exchange of gifts
Annual compulsory gluttony
Annual compulsory shopping spree