An intelligence operative is trained to become both professional prostitute and professional killer in the sense that the intelligence operative is expected to seduce and/or kill any potential victim as part of an assigned intelligence mission. In most intelligence agencies are intelligence operatives enslaved through reference to national security so as to prevent operatives from ever resigning from service and/or divulging “secrets”.
The systemic tyranny and terror of totalitarianism (Communism, Islamism, Juche, Nazism, Ba’athism etc) are organized and perpetrated through intelligence agencies. The originally military-style internal culture and sinces decades increasingly totalitarian internal culture of intelligence agencies of liberal democracies and non-totalitarian dictatorships alike as well as the fact that intelligence agencies systematically infiltrate each other means that the intelligence world has become an increasingly severe threat to free societies everywhere.
Intelligence recruitment takes place both formally and through entrapment. An employee may be approached by a member of the organization/corporation/agency where the the person is employed for the purpose of formal intelligence recruitment. Intelligence training and/or participation in an intelligence mission is typically offered by the police, by the military or by the security department of a private company.
Intelligence recruitment through entrapment takes place in cases where voluntary intelligence recruitment is not deemed feasible. There are numerous intelligence entrapment methods and the unsuspecting citizen typically stands little to no chance against the systematic deployment of those methods precisely because the individual victim is unaware of those methods and therefore simply does not expect them.
The intelligence operative is subjected to the jurisdiction of secret military courts which in practice are politicized due to the fact that virtually everyone in the intelligence world answers to a handler. There is virtually zero transparency in the intelligence world and therefore little to no external accountability which means that intelligence agencies are practically speaking unhindered in committing clearly illegal acts of almost any kind, including rampant organized sexual exploitation of persons of all ages within the intelligence community itself as an intelligence operative is also a professional prostitute.
Intelligence agencies are especially interested in recruiting persons who are deemed brave, intelligent, talented and with a sense of duty of personal mission. However, those traits are however not actually valued as military-style intelligence training enslaves persons into becoming human tools ready to carry out any mission on behalf of the operative’s handler. Members of elites, police/military/security officers, persons deemed sexually attractive and leading overt LGBTQI lifestyles, active feminists and other members of civil society, political activists, journalists and elected politicians, conscripts deemed to have attractive traits are especially vulnerable to intelligence recruitment.
Children of intelligence operatives automatically inherit the enslaved status of their parent(s) and are systematically sexually exploited from an early age, including as seduction agents far below the age of consent. Intelligence whistleblowers are in nearly all cases executed, crushed and/or publicly discredited by various standard operational means.
Accusation of sexual harassment
A victim is continually sexually harassed by the police (uniformed and plainclothes) and its agents with one persistent persisent false accusation of sexual misdemeanor as constantly applied to new social contexts. A lesbian female may become consistently told by police-organized harassers that it is somehow sexual harassment for her to do lesbian cruising in public space such as in supermarkets, streets and libraries and that her overtly lesbian lifestyle thus is somehow “criminal”. There is a method to this as the victim is subjected precisely to that which the victim is falsely accused, namely sexual harassment, including involuntary physical touching. The purpose is to make the victim internalize police anti-LGBTQI bullying and police anti-LGBQI sexual harassment so that the victim will think that she herself is to blame for being persistently and deliberately serially victimized by police-organized sexual harassment. Once the victim is made to internalize the homophobic notion that she herself is to blame for police-organized anti-LGBTQI sexual harassment may a confession of wrongdoing become extracted which despite the absence of any plaintiff may be used to by the police to claim that there is a case for prosecuting the victim for sexual harassment. This is in turn used for the purpose of offering the victim “an alternative to prosecution” by becoming recruited as a police agent for the purpose of “spying on criminals”. This is actually intelligence recruitment leading to intelligence prostitution.
Accusation provocation shop LGBTQI trap
An LGBTQI victim is sexually harassed by an intelligence agent in the role as a shop employee and who falsely accuses the LGBTQI victim herself of sexual harassment and seeks to manipulatively convince the LGBTQI victim that it is rather her LGBTQI lifestyle that is intrinsically a form of sexual harassment. The purpose is to make the LGBTQI victim “promise not to do it again”, something which is generally treated as a confession of criminal intent by the police and in such a case is it an extracted false confession. After such a taped promise is extracted is the LGBTQI victim asked to “come along to the office” and if the LGBTQI victim declines is the LGBTQI victim threatened with the police. This typically makes an LGBTQI victim inclined to “come along to the office” as this seems harmless. Once in the office does a rape agent posing as a shop employee ask the LGBTQI victim to perform fellatio on the rape agent. If the LGBTQI victim declines is the LGBTQI victim threatened with the police. After the LGBTQI victim agrees to perform oral sex is the LGBTQI victim also asked to perform deep-throating and is physically coerced to do so if she declines. More rape agents enter the room and who “correctively rape” the LGBTQI victim who is whereafter physically coerced into commercial prostitution as quickly leading to intelligence prostitution.
The victim is deceived by the police into believing that the police “suspects” the victim of “a crime”. The purpose of this is to manipulate the victim into insisting on innocence while confessing a circumstance of a sexual nature that in turn can be used by the police for police sexual extortion to lure the the victim into intelligence recruitment, part of which turns out to be intelligence prostitution. The victim is deceived into believing that the acknowledgement of the circumstance constitutes a criminal confession which in turn is used by the police to sexually extort the victim into what turns out to be intelligence prostitution.
Intelligence agencies are skilled in detecting and exploiting personal weaknesses and in particular as relating to sexuality. In coercive intelligence recruitment as in free societies typically based on police extortion will the intelligence agency strive to exploit what the intelligence agency believes are the individual weak points of the victim. Yet, both exortion operations and seduction extortion operations follow what are in fact highly stereotypical standard formats and so it may take multiple operations until the victim is successful baited/provoked/threatened into successful extortion and subsequent recruitment into intelligence prostitution.
The victim may become abducted by plainclothes intelligence operatives who may or may not also be police operatives. Abduction may be legal in your jurisdiction if a misunderstanding has been staged to the effect that citizens suspecting a crime may be legally entitled to perform a citizen’s arrest. This is particularly dangerous because the victim may subsequently become kidnapped, raped and corerced into intelligence prostitution by intelligence operatives.
The victim is lured into a meeting at a new address such as for casual sex, a model job or sex work. The victim is drugged, sexually enslaved and after gruesome experiences eventually under threat forced to perform illegal sexual acts with persons below the age of consent. Before release from physical captivity is the person shown incriminating graphic images of illegal sexual relations involving the victim and legal minors below the age of consent. This extortion is enough to force the victim to “consent” to intelligence recruitment, including obviously also intelligence prostitution.
Age assumptions operations
Chronological age is an administrative and legal concept without genetically or otherwise biologically measurable basis as there is no way to genetically or otherwise biologically measure the concept of chronological age. Chronological age is thus a social construct of time measurement rather than body measurement. With most human persons is it however possible to determine whether an individual is above or below the age of consent. Yet, there is wide gray zone and legal systems rely here on good faith, i.e. if a person claims to be older than she actually is chronologically speaking can others not be blamed for her acting in bad faith in deceiving others in being part of the anatomical “gray zone”. However since human chronological age (unlike chronological age in trees) is not a scientific concept but a legal and bureaucratic one will police intelligence interrogators typically try to confuse a victim on the subject. As the police is a thoroughly criminal body in countries all over the world will they not hesitate to confuse and blame a victim on this subject in psychologically manipulating the conscientious victim into wrongly thinking that she has somehow made some error. Police will therefore try to create bad conscious in provoking some kind of statement that could be deployed as a false confession against the victim. Police intelligence interrogators therefore do not hesitate to themselves change information regarding ages and state false chronological ages despite this being illegal, all in order to secure a false confession that can subsequently be deployed to sexually extort a victim into submitting to coercive intelligence recruitment. Seduction agents can also be instructed to state false ages but again does legal practice rely on good faith and one person cannot be blamed for another person acting in bad faith.
Adult-looking legal minors
Mature-looking seduction agents who are legal minors are sent out in the way of the victim. Their appearance (makeup, hairstyle and clothes) are designed in ways to make the victim attracted. The purpose is to manipulate the victim into behavioral conduct that the police can later falsely and wrongly claim to be criminal. Although the acts in question are completely normal with persons above the age of consent and certainly not illegal with persons below the age of consent can a victim nevertheless be aggressive interrogated into “confessing” what are actually non-crimes. Once the confession is secured is the victim coerced into signing a paper that is both a “confession” of non-crimes and an “agreement” to become “a police agent”. If the victim refuses to sign the “confession” of the non-crimes is the victim raped until the victim signs.
The victim meets an adventurous person who seems just perfect for romantic adventure, yet this is a honeytrap with the purpose of enticing the victim into matters that the victim would not otherwise agree to.
Age lie interrogation trap
The victim is called to a dummy interrogation with an otherwise very nice police officer accusing her of sexual harassment against one or more teenagers above the age of consent. Although having committed no crime whatsoever is the victim manipulated into admitting making an error when in fact no legal error was made. The police subsequently falsely claims that the teenagers were below the age of consent. The victim is falsely told that she must choose between prosecution and becoming a “police agent”. She is falsely told that she will be held in indefinite custody and will face years in prison unless she “agrees” to “recruitment” into what turns out to be intelligence prostitution.
Age lie trap
The victim contacts a youth seduction agent who claims to be of an age several years above the age of consent but is in fact slightly below the age of consent. The victim has sex with the seduction agent without checking ID in thinking that this is not necessary. The victim is later extremely persistentively interrogated by the police and falsely told that the victim has committed a crime when in fact the victim legally speaking acted in good faith in having asked about the age. The victim is manipulated into saying that she committed a mistake and apologizing for that “mistake”. The purpose is to extract a confession to the effect that the victim did not act in good faith. The victim is told that she has to choose between being prosecuted or becoming “a police agent”. If the victim does not sign is the victim physically abused and accused of being sexually deviant and a sex criminal. The victim is beated until she signs.
Agent provocateur (provocator agent) is a classical agent role whose task is to provoke a certain intended behavior in a victim. The purpose may be to provoke violence, sexual aggression, verbal agression, drug/alcohol use, criminal behavior or simply facilitate seduction. Either the reaction itself or a sexual continuation of some kind may subsequently be used for extortion purposes by either official police officers or plainclothes police intelligence operatives. Sometimes is the purpose to provoke one of two behaviors with both outcomes being prepared for.
The victim is lured into attempting and/or having sex with a teenage seduction agent eiher not stating chronological age or claiming to be above the age of consent. Unless the victim checks ID prior to proceeding can the victim later become interrogated by the police for having illegally either attempted or having had sex or with a person below the age of consent. The real chronological age does not actually matter in operational terms (intelligence agents are equipped with false IDs or no IDs at all) and so it is essential to check and document ID’s as the police can falsely claim that the person was ostensibly below the age of consent in order to extract a false confession for the purpose of extorting the victim into intelligence prostitution. Checking IDs is especially important if the seduction agent looks both young and petite.
Aggressive interrogation trap
An aggressive interrogation serves to provoke the victim into angry and uncontrollable behavior. If a false confession of either a statutory crime or a non-crime is not successfully extracted can the the police nevertheless “assess” that the expressed anger of the victim “proves” that the victim is temporarily dangerous and must remain in detention for some time which of course offers more opportunities for manipulative interrogation sessions so as to extract some false acknowledgement of wrongdoing of some kind even if not even a statutory crime. If the victim responds with express anger in every interrogation, day after day, is the victim either turned over to psychiatry for interrogation there or is declared a danger to public safety and put in prosecutor-approved indefinite detainment for months where the victim is continually raped, sexually harassed and abusively interrogated by the police until the victim “agrees” to “become a police agent”, meaning of course recruitment into intelligence prostitution. One way for the police to intentionally provoke aggressive behavior in the victim is to extra-judicially humiliate, yell at and insult the victim as well as touch and/or beat the victim’s body until the victim responds in kind in which case the victim may be declared “dangerous” and either prosecuted, handed over to psychiatry or put into indefinite prosector-approved confinement as an ostensibly “dangerous” person for months where the victim is continually harassed, abusively interrogated, humiliated and raped by the police until signing a recruitment form.
Alcohol venues such as bars, nightclubs, BDSM dungeons, sex clubs, strip clubs, swingers clubs and the like are the preferred venues for intelligence entrapment operations. This is due to the fact that these establishments are economically primarily based upon the sale of alcohol. While there may be an entrance fee and/or a “membership fee” does the sale of alcohol still tend to be the main business model of those commercial establishments as based upon their reputations for relative sexual availability and relative social tolerance for promiscuous lifestyles and more libertine socio-sexual behaviors as premised upon the assumption of public alcohol intoxication. Alcohol intoxication to varying degrees makes intended victims more likely to perform acts which they will later likely come to regret and for which “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” can later be extracted by the police and in fact typically much more easily so (and especially if still under the spell of alcohol intoxication) in order so as to extort victims into intellligence prostitution. Yet alcohol operations are not fundamentally different from most other intelligence entrapment operations in that the same methods that are deployed in alcoholic venues are deployed elsewhere as well. It is just that general operational methods are considered far more effective if the victim is under the influence of alcohol intoxication. Alcohol operations may therefore also be performed outside of primarily alcohol-based indoors commercial venues and prominently so outdoors in urban public space (e.g. street prostitution, individual pickup, group sexual harassment, urban festivals, public parades and other festivities in public space) as well as indoors as part of variously themed parties in private homes, in brothels where alcohol is typically sold as well and indoors in public space such as in shopping malls, supermarkets, public libraries and the like.
The victim is deliberately sexually harassed with the purpose of getting the victim off balance so that the victim will speak or otherwise behave in a manner which the victim otherwise would not. The purpose is either to provoke the victim into committing a sexual misdemeanor or else provoke the victim into saying something which the victim otherwise would probably not and then claim that the victim has confessed wrongdoing of some kind. In either case is this done in order to get some kind of “basis” for police sexual extortion leading to more or less involuntary recruitment into intelligence prostitution
Angry Citizen & Quiet Citizen
The victim encounters two intelligence operatives posing as regular citizens, one of whom quietly implies that the victim has committed one or more sexual misdemeanors. The other citizen takes a more aggressive approach in accusing the victim of sexual misdemeanor. The objective of the operation is to make the victim politely apologize which in turn is construed as a criminal confession. The victim is arrested by the police and confronted with “the confession”. If the victim does not dispute “the confession” is this legally construed as validation on the part of the victim that this was a confession in legal terms. The focus in the police interrogation is however on the police falsely offering the victim “a deal” under which the victim “will not be prosecuted” provided that the victim consents to intelligence recruitment. The victim is still unaware that s/he is a victim of police sexual extortion.
The victim receives a delivery either by registered mail, delivered directly to the victim or to the home of the victim. The sender is however anonymous and the victim opens the delivery and then does the police burst in due the anonymous package/box/envelop containing illegal content such as heroin or child pornography as planted there by the police. The victim is aggressively accused of having ordered and paid for the illegal content and then “offered a way out in becoming a police agent”, namely intelligence prostitution.
Anti-LGBTQI criminal interrogation
A victim with an overt LGBTQI lifestyle is interrogated formally/informally and “accused” of acting “criminally” for leading an openly LGBTQI lifestyle. The operationally deliberately performed homophobia/biphobia/transphobia may be crude, implicit or even deliberately carefully disguised structural prejudice. The interrogator may be a “friend” or a “date” whether online or IRL; an undercover police agent, a police officer whether uniformed, plainclothes and/or undercover; an undercover intelligence operative, a social services employee, a psychiatric employee or just about anyone recruited by police/intelligence to act in a role as a citizen interrogator. The trick lies in provoking the victim into becoming temporarily overwhelmed by conflicting emotions of confusion in temporarily falsely believing that her overt LGBTQI lifestyle is somehow “criminal” despite being overtly LGBTQI certainly not being illegal. The purpose is to induce feelings of shame in the victim and thus manipulate the victim into “acknowledging wrongdoing” which can subsequently be used as a purported “confession” for the purpose of sexually extorting the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Anti-personality bullying operations
Police intelligence will typically create a pseudo-psychometric profile of a victim of intended coercive intelligence recruitment and deploy that for bullying operational purposes so as to undermine the victim’s will to resist coercive intelligence recruitment. This is intended to target the weak points of a victim’s personality and thus soften up the victim for mock interrogation as intended to extract a false confession and subsequently use that against the victim in coercing the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Apology operations are about drawing the victim into a pre-designed operational situation where the victim will find it psychologically, socially, politically and/or sexually convenient to “apologize” despite there being no reason for the victim to apologize. The taped apology, explanation etc. is disingenuously treated by the police as if it were a criminal confession and is used to confront, threaten, intimidate and extort the victim into intelligence prostitution such as threatening the victim with “police prosecution” despite the police having no powers of prosecution.
The LGBTQI victim participates in an overt police mock interrogation. The police insinuates that the police has an archive of proven sexual charges against the LGBTQI victim “from the full investigation” and so the victim’s “only chance” according to the police is to “cooperate with the police”; apologize without reason, “explain herself”, “promise not to do it again” and sign a false “confession” of a non-crime. Accumulating an archive of proven sexual charges is however precisely not how the police operates as the police intervenes immediately if they believe themselves to be able to prove a sex crime and they do so according to the police principle of the police being obliged to prevent the occurence of future sex crimes and this operational principle is hypocritically “applied” in sexual entrapment operations against innocent LGBTQI victims as well. The fake interrogation is intended to build psychological pressures against the LGBTQI victim in producing literally “anything” that the police can disingenuously claim to constitute a “confession” which they may subsequently use against the LGBTQI victim so as to sexually extort the LGBTQI victim into intelligence prostitution.
Informal interrogation may take place literally anywhere whether online or IRL and any partner to a dialogue, discussion, informal debate, quarrel etc. may in fact be an undercover interrogator. The purpose is to discursively lead the victim astray in making the victim express, confide and/or acknowledge “something” that may subsequently be used to sexually (and/or otherwise) extort the victim into intelligence prostitution. Association baiting is central in argumentation operations in bringing up varying issues as systematically intended to provoke the victim into uttering “something” whether ambigious or implicit that may be deployed by the police against the victim in illegally sexually and/or otherwise extorting the victim into intelligence prostiution.
The victim is deliberately subjected to designed social situations as intended to cause her sexual arousal – the purpose of which is to provoke her into unusual behaviors so as to either lure her into scenarios into which she would otherwise not usually venture or to provoke her into deeds which the police can later claim constitute statutory crimes. The most common scenario is the victim being lured into what she is made to believe is romance and/or casual sex but actually leads to her being raped and forced into commercial prostitution and subsequent intelligence prostitution. Another common type of operation is to provoke her into sex with teenagers without checking and documenting ID(s) in which case she will become interrogated by the police under false pretenses as the police which will try to extract a false “confession” for a crime which she did not commit and subsequently use the false “confession” to extort her into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is assigned a task by her employer or by someone in an NGO in which the victim takes part. The victim is told/asked to do something that is legal and once the victim has carried out the assignment is the victim accused by the police of committing a crime. The police will deliberately endeavor to delude the victim into believing that she has committed a crime and subsequently extract an unfounded “acknowledgement of wrongdoing” (an explanation, an apology, claiming a misunderstanding etc.) out of the victim’s desire to please and reconcile with the interrogator. The unfounded “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” is subsequently used to extort the victim into intelligence prostitution by deliberately falsely claiming that the victim has confessed a crime.
Sexual relations between superior and subordinate as well as between assistant and client are problematic in the sense that these open up for unfounded sexual entrapment accusations of inappropriate socio-sexual conduct since these relationships by social convention and sometimes legislation “are not supposed” to be “sexual”. A relationship commences between the victim and an undercover seduction agent and there is typically only one sexual encounter after which the seduction agent becomes incommunicado and the victim is informally interrogated by “the person in charge” who after extracting an unfounded “acknowledgment a wrongdoing” (e.g. by “explain yourself or you will lose your job”) in getting an apology, explanation, “promise to not do it again” etc. will try to lure the victim into some further sexual entrapment context such as an invitation to a sex party where further sexual entrapment operations commence. “The person in charge” may also seduce the victim and subsequently extort the victim into further sex by threatening to “tell the police” or a spouse, partner etc. about some aspect of the former “assistant relationship”. “The person in charge” will subsequently endeavor to commercially prostitute the victim and if the victim refuses is the victim contacted by the police who will interrogate the victim in accusing the victim of fabricated fictious sexual misdemeanors. Since the police already have a taped “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” from the informal interrogation by “the person in charge” can this be used to to extract further false “confessions” and subsequently extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
A “family” (actually intelligence agents) posing as refugees claim to desperately need asylum. One way out is for one of them to marry a local. The victim agrees to marry a member of “the family” and the victim is later forced/lured into prostitution by other “family members” causing the the victim to become dragged into intelligence prostitution. The victim may also be interrogated by the police and forced to confess to entering a fictitious marriage. This “confession” is subsequently used for police extortion with the purpose of coercively recruiting the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Bad conscience provocation
The victim is interrogated by an extremely nice, sexually attractive and typically female police officer. The purpose is impel the victim to feel emotionally and by extension also morally inferior and thus provoke guilt in the victim so that the victim will apologize as if the victim were in a relationship with the “nice” police officer and so as to somehow “smooth over” a relationship quarrel. This exploits the subconscious desire in the victim to be in an intimate relationship with the “nice” police officer. Yet of course this is nothing but mere intelligence gender performance meant to manipulate the victim into doing/saying things that the victim otherwise would not do/say. The purpose is dually to provoke the victim to spontaneously act sexually inappropriate towards the victim as well as secure some kind of confession for “wrongdoing” such as an apology or “explanation” or “not having had any bad intentions”.
Many professional female models work as luxury sex workers as well (these are usually female students making a living while studying) and are as such easily recruited into intelligence prostitution where they are used as beauty decoys. The purpose is to provoke a victim into conduct which the police afterwards may delibterately falsely claim to constitute a legal infringement of a sexual nature. The idea is that meeting someone extremely sexually attractive is far more likely to provoke the victim into spontaneous behavior in a manner in which the victim would not usually act. Subsequently may this be used to extract an unfounded “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” in making the victim retroactively “feel bad” about having acted in an unusual manner in not understanding that the police deliberately lies in order to extract a false confession so as to subsequently extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is seduced by one or more adult seduction agents. The victim sleeps in the home used by the seduction agent(s) for this operation. Underage seduction agent(s) below the age of consent are also part of the operation and posing as offspring of the adult seduction agents. One or more underage seduction agents engage in sexual intercourse with the victim while the victim is asleep. The victim wakes up and leaves the bed in shock over what is taking place entirely without the victim’s consent. Later is the victim arrested by the police and shown “incriminating pictures” and “offered a deal” whereby the victim will elude prosecution if the victim agrees to intelligence recruitment. The victim thinks it was the fault of the child/ren and does not realize that s/he is being extorted into intelligence prostitution.
Benevolent police officer trap
A police officer (often a physically attractive female) pretends to be compassionate, unbiased, honest, fair and law-abiding and furthermore pretends to be surprised and even shocked at hearing that the police systematically commits crimes as long as this is socially accepted among the police, that the police deliberately and systematically so extracts false confessions by means of psychological manipulation, engages in systematic sexual exploitation against for example sex workers and systematically sexually harasses for example sexually attractive overt LGBTQI persons. The purported “naivete” is however extremely revealing considering the structural sexism, racism, transphobia and heterosexism among the police as that is certainly information to which every police officer to varying degree is privy. The purpose is to gain the confidence of the victim and this way manipulate the victim into saying something ambiguous which the police could deliberately misconstrue and deploy for the purpose of police sexual extortion leading to intelligence prostitution. If the “benevolence” tactic does not work may the police officer at some point abruptly change interrogation technique such as emotionally appealing to the morality and conscience of the victim and this way extract subjective, ambiguous statements or even shock the victim by deploying aggressive interrogation techniques so as to provoke the victim to speak emotionally in anger in a manner which the victim would not otherwise do.
The victim is intentionally and deliberately so subjected to varying forms of structural prejudice (e.g. ableism, racism, sexism, transphobia etc.) when in fact the purpose is to provoke the victim in some way; 1) extract a false confession of wrongdoing of some kind, 2) declare the victim mentally ill, 3) declare the victim dangerous and a threat to public safety and/or 4) provoke the victim into subsequently filing a police complaint for hate crimes in which case the victim is immediately blamed by the police and accused of being a “suspect”. In either case is the purpose to gain opportunities for the police to extort and otherwise coerce the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Sexual and other systemic extortion by the police or someone else against a victim is usually how domestic coercive intelligence recruitment takes place. This typically involves the police or someone in a position of authority extracting an “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” such as an apology, an explanation or “a promise not do do it again” in “confessing” a non-crime and thus taking advantage of the victim’s fears, opportunism, conscientiousness, vanity, hypocrisy, empathy etc. The non-confession is subsequently used to sexually and/or otherwise extort the victim into intelligence recruitment. Victims are usually prone to trust lies as peddled by police intelligence operatives as operational routine in both coercive intelligence recruitment and intelligence training. Police and intelligence however try hard in sexual and other entrapment operations in luring the victim into committing a crime for which “the police” can threaten the victim with police prosecution despite the police having no such powers as the victim is subsequently extorted into intelligence prostitution. This is because the silence of an intelligence operative is maintained by recourse to stuctural sexual extortion, including as based on compulsory involvement in the illicit intelligence sexual subculture with its patently illegal sexual practices.
The victim is induced/lured/provoked into “doing something” in a nightclub and is subsequently approached and interrogated by a bouncer. If a confession for “having done something wrong” is secured is the victim led to a room and raped by the bouncer who is an intelligence rape agent and subsquently coerced into prostitution causing the victim to become drawn into intelligence prostitution. If the person refuses to come along to the room is the person turned over to police who may also rape the victim and certainly in any case endeavor to extort the victim to recruitment into intelligence prostitution.
Provoking a physically violent fight so as to enable the police to subsequently extort the victim into doing what the police wants by false threat of prosecution.
A socio-sexual, sexual, romantic, semi-romantic or platonic relationship whether online or IRL with a seduction agent suddenly ends. After the relationship has ended does the seduction agent permanently cease contact with the emotionally confused and perhaps also romantically infatuated victim. The purpose is to make the victim “chase” the seduction agent and if the victim does is the victim subjected to a formal police interrogation with the purpose of manipulating the victim to “acknowledge” what the police claims to be “stalking” although various other fabricated fictious sexual accusations may be added as well. The victim is confronted with a series of fabricated fictious charges and the purpose is to make the victim “want to come to agreement” with the police so as to come across as friendly and cooperative and so the victim is typically lured into “acknowledging wrongdoing” without reason out of psychologically induced “desire to be friends” with police intelligence. At that point is a victim typically ready to accept an offer to “become a police agent” as leading inexorably to intelligence prostitution.
The victim is brought into activities (whether legal or illegal) that ruin the economy of the victim. The purpose of this is to force the victim into commercial prostitution in one way or another and once brought under an exploiter is the victim either “saved” or coerced into intelligence prostitution.. This type of operation is against performed hard-to-recruit victims.
The victim falls in love with a person (actually an intelligence seduction agent) who claims to have economic problems. The victim is convinced to perform commercial sex work so as to help the “partner” economically. This in turn causes the victim to become drawn into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is sexually approached by one or more teenage boys (actually teenage intelligence prostitutes) above the age of consent. After the victim has had sex with the teenage boy(s) is the victim’s home invaded by teenage “friends” of the boy who take over the victim’s home and coerce the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Luring the victim into a brothel so as to prostitute the victim too and subsequently extort the victim into doing what the police wants, including the police sexually exploiting the victim.
The victim is subjected to bullying operations IRL and online, the purpose of which are to compel the victim to provide a false confession or at least offer some kind of false “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” and the victim is prepared for this by destroying the victim’s self-esteem. A victim of bullying tends to rationalize the behaviors of her bullies as well as internalize their stigmatization of her. Bullying also makes the victim more self-critical and so bullying facilitates extracting a false confession or at least extracting some kind of “acknowledgement of wrongdoing” such as an explanation or an apology, something which can be claimed to constitute a “confession” in order for the police to sexually (and/or otherwise) extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The legally adult victim is bullied by legal minors and provoked into physical violence. After which is the victim arrested by the police and extorted into intelligence prostitution under threat of prosecution for violent assault against legal minors.
The victim is enticed into casual sex with a seduction agent who subsequently uses this to lure the victim into further sexual activities with yet other persons leading to entrapment for real/imaginary crimes; e.g. luring the victim into sex work and/or illegal sexual relations.
The victim is either chased by legal minors under the age of consent as sent out by the intelligence service or legal minors under the age of consent are sent out to walk/bike in front of the victim in order to create a false appearance of the victim chasing legal minors below the age of consent. This method is used to create a false facade of the victim being “dangerous” and “a threat to public safety” without even a criminal trial or police-induced involvement of psychiatry. Once these coercive means (typically indefinite detainment of the victim by the police for months) is quasi-legally enforced on the victim can the police use this very coercion for the purpose of using that leverage of power in order to coercively recruit the victim into intelligence prostitution. The victim will also likely suffer regular police rape while in this prosecutor-approved custody which may go on for months with regular manipulative interrogation harassment sessions to extract a false confession.
A victim in a committed relationship of a sexually exlusive nature is drawn into sexual infidelity with a seduction agent. Afterwards/later will the seduction agent extort the victim for more sex by threatening to tell the victim’s spouse/partner. This may begin in jest and subsequently become increasingly serious in the seduction agent also demanding money and later endeavoring to persuade the victim to perform commercial sex work due to the extorter’s ostensibly “difficult economic situation”. At some point may the seduction agent reveal himself to the victim as an intelligence operative and demand that the victim signs on to intelligence recruitment with the more or less stated threat that the extorter will otherwise tell the victim’s spouse/partner. The victim fears that this would destroy her committed relationship and so agrees to sign up for intelligence recruitment as inexorably leading to intelligence prostitution. The sexual relationship with the sexually experienced extorter may actually be very interesting emotionally, psychologically, physically and sexually speaking and so does the victim “aggree” to become sexually extorted due to fears of losing both the infidelity relationship and her committed, nominally exclusive relationship.
Child harassers trap
The victim is harassed by child intelligence operatives posing as neighborhood children, such as by means of banking on doors and windows, yelling, directing flashlights towards windows and performing telephone harassment. The purpose is to provoke the victim into telling the children to stop, yell at them and even chase them. Once this has been successfully provoked is the victim formally interrogated by the police which deliberately falsely accuses the victim of sexually harassing, threatening and/or physically/sexually abusing children below the age of consent. The police will behave exactly the same way towards the victim if the victim files an official police complaint regarding the harassments. The purpose of this is to invent a legal excuse for further official police harassment against the victim who is subjected to further mock interrogations with the purpose of provoking further anger from the victim by reinforcing the trauma of harassment in the police seeking to have the victim declared “sexually deviant”, “a threat to public safety”, “mentally deranged” and the like. This is done with the purpose of enabling further police-organized harassment against the victim and especially so through other government agencies. The purpose is to put psychological pressure on the victim so that the victim will become more amenable to police sexual (and other) extortion into intelligence prostitution. LGBTQI victims are particularly vulnerable to such harassment operations since they tend to be fearful of courts of law being unfair to LGBTQI people.
Religious clergy are commonly recruited as intelligence operatives and used as proactive seduction agents in targeting a member of a cleric’s local congregation. The purpose is typically to sexually extort the victim whereby the cleric or “someone else” threatens to tell a member of the victim’s immediate family about the sexual relationship with the cleric. Catholic priests have typically either gay sexual preferences or intergenerational sexual preferences for legal minors below the age of consent and are as such considered especially suitable as prospective intelligence operatives. If the adult victim develops a sexual relationship with the cleric is the purpose to draw the victim towards sex with children below the age of consent and subsequently use even perfectly legal physical/psychological promixity for the purpose of police sexual extortion into intelligence prostitution. Since Catholic priests are so frequently intelligence operatives whether for Vatican Intelligence (CDF) or for other intellligence agencies do they in their capacity as intelligence operatives have immunity from prosecution in civilian courts of law unless already very significantly publicly exposed. Catholic clergy are generally sexually active and those who are intelligence operatives of Vatican, allied or their national intelligence can freely engage in illegal intergenerational sexual relations without risking prosecution unless of course first significantly publicly exposed.
The victim is lured into a bar, sex club, nightclub or BDSM dungeon. The victim is subsequently interrogated by a security guard with purpose of making the victim confess a sexual misdemeanor. Once the “confession” is secured is the victim raped by the security guard who is actually an undercover intelligence rape agent. The victim cannot ask the police for help and is subequently forced into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is befriended by “a colleague” at work and they become intimate with each other. The victim is called into the office of the manager and falsely told that he stands accused of rape. The manager claims that s/he will side with the victim provided that the victim consents to sex with the manager after which the victim is asked to have more sex with others in managerial positions. The victim probably does not understand that s/he has already been sexually extorted and is subsequently threatened with telling the victim’s family about sex at work and is so drawn into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is told that multiple persons claim that she has committed a wrongdoing of a sexual or socio-sexual nature and she is deceived into believing that she will face prosecution. A purported but not actual “collective accusation” misleadingly sounds so “legally strong” that the victim is psychologically manipulated by the police interrogator(s) into wrongly believing that she has “done something wrong” and is deceived into falsely “acknowledging wrongdoing” whether through apology or “explanation”; something which is treated as if it were a “confession” on the non-basis of which she is extorted by the police into intelligence prostitution. “Collective accusations” are especially deployed after a victim has been lured into group sex with intelligence operatives.
The victim rightly feels victimized by multiple unsuccessful covert operations to which the victim has been subjected and turns to someone the victim falsely believes can be trusted such a counselor, a psychologist, a psychoterapist or a police officer at either a hate crimes unit or an internal investigations unit within the police. The person whom the victim contacts is an undercover intelligence operative whose purpose is to listen with intense empathy at the complaints of the victim with the purpose of making the victim “confess” or otherwise confide something that can be used later by the police to extort the victim after which the victim will be arrested, interrogated and extorted into intelligence prostitution. Another purpose is seducing the victim after which “the trusted person” may extort the victim by claiming that the victim has said something which the victim has never said. “The trusted person” will use the extortion to get more and more sex with the victim and at some point will the victim either extort or force the victim into commercial prostitution or police prostitution as leading into intelligence prostitution. Another version is that the victim contacts “the regular police” and is met by at least one hostile police officer who instead starts interrogating the victim and may even refuse to even properly accept the complaint.
Compromise confession trap
A seemingly “friendly” formal interrogator drafts a written version of a taped formal mock interrogation. The text seems like a very nicely written journalistic feature interview and while the opinions of the victim are richly included for flattery does the text actually contain deliberately and carefully embedded distortions of the taped interrogation. The purpose is to make the victim emotionally “feel heard” so that the victim will think of the “protocol” as “fair” in ostensibly “giving expression to both sides” and so induce the victim to sign a false “aknowledgement of wrongdoing” that is supposed to be used as an actual or purported “confession” for the purpose of the police sexually and/or otherwise extorting the victim inte intelligence prostitution.
The victim is manipulated into confiding in someone as the victim having developed trust in a “friend”, a psychologist, counsellor or sex partner who is actually an intelligence seduction agent. Once the victim has made herself vulnerable by confiding something very sensitive does the intelligence operative start to extort the victim into sex in threatening to tell “the secret” to the police, to relatives, to parents, to a spouse and/or to the victim’s boss. Once this has been achieved is the victim extorted into commercial prostitution as well as leading to intelligence prostitution. If the victim does not comply with the sexual demands of the sexual extorter may the victim become interrogated by the police for the same purpose of extracting an “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” in extorting the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Confidence operations are inspired by confidence tricks as widely used in the criminal world. The purpose of confidence operations is to build up a somehow confidential relationship between the victim and a decoy agent who makes herself sexually available to the victim. The purpose is to make the victim confide in the decoy agent as well as engage in sexual relations with the decoy agent, all for the purposes of (usually sexual) entrapment so as to devise something that can be deployed for (usually sexual) police extortion against the victim so as to eventually lure the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Confusion operations are designed to provoke unintentional or unusual behavior on the part of the victim due to pushing the victim into a mental state of confusion, particularly in provoking unusual socio-sexual behavior and extracting false confessions, all designed for police extortion so as coerce the victim into intelligence prostitution. The intention is to push the victim into spontaneous behavior without prior thought for which the police can subsequently psychologically manipulate the victim into expressions of remorse which in turn are treated as “confessions” and on the basis of which the police can sexually extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Conspiracy theorist trap
A difficult-to-recruit victim suffers effective persecution from the intellligence agency in it being determined to both crush and coercively recruit the victim into intelligence prostitution. The victim is deluded into believing that there is an elaborate conspiracy against her and she is subsequently contacted by intelligence operatives professing belief in conspiracy theories. The victim begins to sound paranoid in telling others about her newfound conspiratorial beliefs. The intelligence agency deploys psychiatry against the victim as used to enslave, interrogate and entrap her and thus ultimately drag the victim into intelligence prostitution.
“Corrective rape” against LGBTQI persons and asexual persons alike is a common method used by police forces around the world for the purpose of recruitment into intelligence prostitution. The rapists may be uniformed, plainclothes undercover agents or simply a criminal gang as indeed paid by the national police to “correctively rape” the victim.
Luring the victim to sleep with a couple with the purpose of luring a person into prostitution so as to enable the police to extort the victim into doing as the police wants.
Credibility trapping takes place by drawing the victim into a situation where either the victim is manipulated/provoked into lying/denying and/or enticed into a socio-sexual situation of epistemological privilege whereby the victim due to age difference, gender difference, race difference, ethnic difference, accent difference, medical difference, psychiatric difference, different citizenship, sexual difference, economic difference, professional difference etc. is treated as if she is inherently not credible. The victim is given the impression that she will not be believed and therefore faces prosecution and conviction unless she “cooperates with the police” and agrees to confess acts which she did not commit or at least apologizes for misunderstanding, confusion, not having had bad intentions etc. or simply “explaining herself”. The victim is manipulated into believing that the police will “forgive” her for her non-crimes if she only is nice and apologizes for in fact having done nothing wrong. If the victim has been provoked into lying/denying/blaming can this be used to performatively destroy the credibility of the victim. In any case is this about giving the victim the false impression that unless she “cooperates with the police” such as signing a prepared written false confession, signs a form to become “a police agent” (in practice recruitment into intelligence prostitution), agrees to have sex with interrogating police officer(s) etc. will she not be believed. The victim may be told that the police will hold her in custody until she agrees to “cooperate with the investigation”, “gets back to her senses” etc. Interrogation methods may include only “good cop”, only “bad cop” (e.g. provoking the victim into angry and even violent outbursts), some version of “god cop & bad cop” or some other interrogation technique.
The victim is lured into the wrong kind of company, including particularly through sexual relations. The victim may either be lured into participating in a crime which the victim wrongly believes is not criminal or become deceived by the police into believing that a non-criminal act is ostensibly criminal. An explicit or indirect confession whether for a statutory crime, an imaginary crime, a committed crime or for a crime that has not been committed (or at least not so by the victim) may be be used by the police for the purpose of extorting the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Luring the person into commiting a crime (typically a sex crime) and subsequently the police uses that to extort the person to do as the police wants.
Criminal gangs involved in organized prostitution are tasked with raping and/or gang-raping the victim, forcibly getting the victim hooked on heroin and subsequently enabling the police to extort the person into doing exactly what the police wants.
Sexually harassing the person and in so doing constantly falsely accusing the victim of being a sex offender despite no formal charges ever having being brought against the victim.
Crimes may be committed against the victim in order so as to provoke the victim into filing a complaint with the police. Once this is done is the victim turned into the ostensible suspect as the offenders will accuse the victim of crime. This is an effective entrapment method in exploiting the victim’s sense of “justice” and naive belief in the impartiability of the “system of justice”. The victim may also be deceived into believing that others have filed criminal complaints against the victims and so the victim may feel “obliged” to defend herself against mock accusations as intended to extract a false confession which can subsequently be deployed for police extortion so as to lure the victim into intelligence prostitution. If the victim files numerous complaints to the police will this typically be abused in order to accuse the victim of mental illness and deploy psychiatry as an interrogation mechanism so as to produce a confession for something and subsequently use the “confession” to exort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Custody rape trap
The victim is interrogated by the police at the police station and subsequently subjected to temporary incarceration at the police station and told that the victim will be temporarily held in custody there “until the victim admits to a wrongdoing” of a crime or non-crime. This is a technique intended to extract a false confession for an act of a sexual nature as intended for use by the police for the purpose of sexual extortion as leading towards intelligence prostitution. “Refusal to cooperate” leads to the police raping the victim while in custody and the victim is subsequently told that the prosecutor’s office will press charges against the victim if the victim files an official complaint about the rape. The victim is falsely made to believe that the police has something which the police can use to exort the victim into “agreeing” to intelligence recruitment.
The victim is offered and accepts a job position where the victim interacts with customers. The manager calls the victim into his office and says that a customer has complained of sexual harassment. The manager says that the victim this will be overlooked provided that the victim has sex with the manager. The victim is unaware that s/he is being extorted and as s/he is asked to have sex with more persons in managerial positions and the victim drawn into intelligence prostitution by further extortion such as threatening to tell family and friends about the sex at the office.
The victim is subjected to mock interrogation by an intelligence operative claiming to be the father of a relatively young person whom the victim has acquainted/befriended. The “daddy” may either pretend to be “protective” of his daughter or accuse the victim of a sexual misdemeanor and in either case to extract a direct or indirect confession for either an imaginary crime or a criminal act which the victim simply has not committed. The “daddy” may extract a promise “not to bother his daughter anymore” which the police may claim to be a confession of criminal violation.
The victim encounters two intelligence operatives in roles as “father with a teenage daughter” and the operational purpose is to manipulate the victim into becoming social with “father and daughter”. The teenage daughter seems to be sexually precocious although however not necessarily physically so. The operational goal is to make the victim socialize with this “little family” and the intention is to make the victim sexually intimate with both “father” and “daughter”. Either is the victim seduced by the “daughter” who is in her early teens or else is the victim first seduced by the “father” and later does the “daughter” enter the sexual scene as well. Even if there is no successful seduction by the “daughter” intelligence operative may the police nevertheless accuse the victim of not reporting and even participating in child sexual abuse. The conscientious victim despite not having committed any legal violation may nevertheless be provoked into offering an unwarranted “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” of some kind which may be used by the police for the purpose of sexual extortion into intelligence prostitution. If the victim however reports child sexual abuse to the police will she immediately be accused by the police of committing that very crime and the victim is treated as if she were a sex criminal wíth the psychological purpose of making her more amenable to police sexual extortion into intelligence prostitution.
A date or sexual conversation with a person who is actually a seduction agent turns into an informal interrogation. The taped conversation is subsequently used by the police to extort the victim into intelligence training. One version of this is asking what the person likes sexually for the purpose of making the victim confess interest in illegal sexual relations. This may be used as an ostensible confession for the police to exort the victim into intelligence prostitution. The provided information may be used to later lure the victim into committing such illegal sexual acts. The victim is typically drugged before before being lured into committing such illegal sexual acts. The seduction agent may state interest in non-consensual sex, yet subsequently refuses to enter a BDSM agreement with a password and so insists on nominally non-consensual sex. Since nominally non-consensual sex is illegal in most jurisdictions may this be used by the police for a staged interrogation with the purpose of forcing an criminal confession leading to exortion into intelligence prostitution.
Date rape accusation
An intentionally false accusation of date rape is a powerful tool for police intelligence to extort a victim into intelligence prostitution. Since dominance/submission is to some extent part of most sexual relations/relationships even in otherwise egalitarian relations/relationships may dominant behavior on the part of the victim in bed or elsewhere with an intentionally passive decoy intelligence agent become deployed by the police against the victim so as to provoke “bad conscience” in the victim in provoking the victim into somehow apologizing in “acknowledging a wrongdoing”. Once the victim has ceded some ground may the victim become threatened with “police prosecution” despite the police having no such powers and sexually extorted into intelligence prostitution.
Date rape trap
The victim is lured into sex with one or more rape agents whether as casual sex, through dating, as part of a relationship, group sex or otherwise. As part of what may otherwise in legal terms may or may not be “consensual sex” is the victim raped although the victim is not necessarily aware that she is being raped. The rape agent drugs the victim and coerces her into commercial prostitution and later intelligence prostitution. If the victim files a complaint with the police will she become raped by yet another rape agent in the role of a police officer who will tell her that “she is a whore”. The victim has nowhere to turn and is enslaved into intelligence prostitution.
The different stages of the social phenomenon of hetorocultural dating from asking out to cohabitation and of course sexual interaction including public kissing offers rich opportunities for intelligence outfits to coerce a victim into intelligence prostitution. Since heteroculture is premised on systemic sexism and is as such intrinsically unethical does the police endeavor to identify some weak spot in the victim’s behavior which can subsequently be used for interrogation purposes to accuse the victim of “wrongdoing”. Despite the victim not having done anything illegal does the police intentionally misinterpret something in order to provoke the victim into “apologizing for acting wrongly”. Once “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” has been secured is the victim treated as if this were a criminal confession and is “as such” used to sexually extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
In the United States can the prosecutor’s office make a deal with a person accused of criminal misdemeanor. This is legally possible in some jurisdictions around the world but not in others. Don’t assume that this is possible in your country of residence merely because it is possible in the United States. Thus do not accept the assumption that the prosecutor’s office in your jurisdiction has such powers unless they actually legally do. A lawyer (even a trusted one) may be used to lure a victim into “signing a deal” whose full implications the victim is unaware of as signing a document where such “deals” are not legally possible is simply a police trap deployed in order to coerce a false confession of criminal wrongroing. Once a dummy document is signed can it be used for police sexual extortion leading to involuntary recruitment into intelligence prostitution. A lawyer’s advice to “agree to a deal” may be highly persuasive but a victim is strongly advised not to sign anything implying or admitting something that a victim has not done or in any way or fashion agreeing to take on any kind of mission for the police or intelligence world.
A decoy agent is a seduction agent who makes herself sexually available in one way or another either directly or indirectly and is distinguished from a proactive seduction agent who actively initiates seduction in public space.
The victim is enticed to become intimate with a decoy seduction agent who makes herself psychologically available, e.g. at a bus stop or literally anywhere.
The victim is subjected to informal/formal interrogation and the victim defends herself by blaming someone else such as “it was his fault!”. The police will subsequently claim that this constitutes a confession for something (whether a statutory or imaginary crime) which the victim did not intend to confess such as an act which the victim certainly did not commit.
The victim is made to believe that the victim needs to defend herself against police “accusations” relating to an act of a sexual nature which is actually a non-crime. The purpose is to draw the victim into a manipulative and deceptive interrogation as intended to make the victim “defend herself” from dummy accusations of purported but not actual sexual demeanors. The words of the victim are used to disingenously claim that the victim has acknowledged committing a crime of a sexual nature and subsequently use this acknowledgement of a non-crime to sexually extort the victim into “consenting” to intelligence recruitment as leading to intelligence prostitution.
The victim is made to believe that the intelligence world has absolute and unlimited powers in non-totalitarian societies so that there is absolutely no use to blog, contact the media or litigate. It is true however that there is probably no point in filing a complaint with the police unless the purpose is planned entrapment in exposing how the the police and the prosecutor’s office even in liberal democracies are subservient to the intelligence world and are complicit in the perpetration of criminal offences. There is one thing that the intelligence world shies away from and that is public exposure. Merely because the intelligence agency may convince one particular local or national journalist not to write about something by telling lies about the victim (typically accusing the victim of being a criminal, mentally ill or sexually deviant) does not mean that there are no journalists who are ready to take on writing about criminal wrongdoings by the police and intelligence world online. The intelligence world hysterically fears litigation and if you blog and/or contact the media then so do so in a manner that will destroy their credibility and not yours. The intelligence agency is likely to send out someone trying to convince you to believe in conspiracy theories in order to publicly discredit you and create a sense of overwhelming fear that will make you think that it is not worth it to go public and that it is better to “cooperate” with the police and the intelligence world and seemingly conveniently go along with their demands. However, if you choose to litigate or go public in some other way, then do so in a calibrated manner specifically designed for the intended public/political effect and you can also cease the litigation once your goals have been attained. The purpose of litigation is specifically not primarily to gain the approval of members of the court but rather help publicly expose criminal/shady practices by the police and intelligence worlds. Also keep in mind that journalists are far more inclined to write about something if you have already commenced litigation. Yet litigation ought be done the right way and so think first and act later.
Domestic violence victim trap
The victim encounters a purported “batted woman” (actually a seduction agent from the the intelligence community) whom s/he takes into her home along with “her children” (at least some of whom are below the age of consent) who are also also intelligence prostitutes. The victim is heavily drugged and subsequently seduced by the sexually experienced children of “the battered woman”. The victim is later interrogated by the police and when confronted with photographic and video evidence is the victim coerced into intelligence recruitment.
Double prostitution accusation
It is technically complex for a person as targeted by police intelligence for coercive (nominally “protective”) intelligence recruitment to engage in any kind of sexual relations. If the victim meets another person and they walk home together with the intention of potentially becoming intimate may the police sexually harass them by accusing them of prostitution despite both being private citizens. Even one of them having significant cash other than minor pocket money may be used by the police to deliberately and without basis sepately accuse the two of mutually performing prostitution. Even in jurisdictions such as Sweden where it is not illegal to sell sexual services but only to purchase them does the police sexually harass sex workers for “disturbing public order”, “offending the public” and the like. Sexually harassing sex workers and extracting sexual favors from them is indeed a popular pastime for police officers in all countries around the world. Since accusations of prostitition are loaded with emotions of shame are mock prostitution accusations particularly effective in extorting a victim into “consenting” to what turns out to be intelligence prostitution.
A common operational approach is to manipulate the victim into self-doubt so that the victim will question herself and her own experiences and victimization. The purpose is to compel her to engage in psychologic denial as a defense mechanism for purposes of manipulating her to perform some kind of utterance and/or behavior that will somehow facilitate coercively recruiting her into intelligence prostitution.
Drinking buddy trap
Undercover police agent is tasked with becoming a drinking friend of the victim in order so as to extract a false confession.
The police will try to attach illegal drugs onto the victim. There are various means for doing that. It can be done by luring the victim into purchasing illegal drugs, slipping illegal drugs into a bag or a pocket of the victim, sending the drugs by mail to the victim, usually by registered mail from a seemingly trustworthy sender such as seemingly nominally but not actually officially from the police itself. The police may offer the victim to receive a copy of a purported criminal investigation against the victim and when the victim opens the letter or box does it contain illegal drugs. The police then arrests the victim and claims that the victim is a criminal and a drug trader. “A good cop” subsequently offers the victim “a deal” according to which “the police will forget about the whole thing” provided that the victim will agree to become a police agent, meaning in practice recruitment into intelligence prostitution.
Drug purchase trap
Luring a victim into purchasing using illegal drugs so as to be able to somehow extort that person such as through extracting a confession.
The victim is lured into consuming excessive amounts of alcohol including as spiked with illegal drugs such as cocaine or heroin in the hope that the person will commit a “perceived” or actual legal infringement for which the person can subsequently become extorted by the police.
Dummy evidence trap
The victim is presented with intelligence-fabricated evidence such as intentionally false claims by the police as intended to provoke the victim into defending herself from those purported “accusations”. The purpose is to ensnare the victim into verbal defense which “admits circumstances” that can be used by the police for the purpose of disingenously threatening the victim with prosecution and so is the victim offered “to cooperate with the police” in becoming “a police agent” as an alternative to ostensible but not actual prosecution.
Email interrrogation trap
Formal police interrogation at the police station fails to produce a false confession of any kind and the physically attractive decoy police intelligence operative suggests that they continue through email. The purpose is to achieve through email what the formal interrogator failed to achieve through a formal police interrogation at the police station. The victim thinks this is an invite to physical intimacy and will either become consensually physical with the seduction agent (in which case the victim will become accused of sexually assaulting or sexually harassing a police officer) or the victim will become encouraged to commence through email what he thinks is the beginning of an intimate relationship. Many people put a lot of time and effort into answering questions through email and so the victim is likely to think that the exchange of emails is simply about “clearing up a misunderstanding” when in fact “explanation” and “apology” are treated by the police as successfully extracted false confession on the basis of which they can subsequently extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is put under emotional pressure (e.g. through sexual harassment) with the purpose of making the victim “confess” a wrongdoing (e.g. as part of crying) whether a crime or a non-crime. As the victim is under constant police electronic surveillance can the taped emotional outburst subsequently be used by the police for the purpose of police sexual extortion leading to intelligence recruitment into intelligence prostitution.
Abusing a person’s sense of empathy is deployed so as to lure the victim into contexts in which the victim would otherwise be reluctant to venture and this subsquently entangles the victim in hostile operations of seduction, provocation and extortion. This may involve persons in need of help or understanding from others. This may involve almost any group of persons and an intelligence/police agent claiming to be part of a group of vulnerable, exposed, deserving or weak persons; e.g. asylum seekers, prostitutes, drug addicts, beggars, street children and the like.
The victim is approached by an employee or owner of an establishment such as a supermarket, a nightclub, a bar, a museum or a cinema and is accused of sexual harassment. The victim is threatened with the police with the intention of extorting the victim. If the extortion attempts fails will the victim be falsely told that there are multiple sexual harassment complaints against the victim and that there will be consequences if “this” ever happens again. The purpose is to make the victim apologize or lie/blame/deny which in either case will treated by the police as if a confession which subsequently can be used to extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim meets an employee (e.g. shop clerk or nurse) in a particular establishment who gives the impression of being intimately and emotionally interested in the victim. The victim takes the hint and responds in kind. The victim is later approached by another employee, by the police and/or by psychiatry for the purpose of informal/formal interrogation as intended to induce a sense of guilt and extract a false confession for sexual harassment which in turn is used for police sexual extortion leading to recruitment into intelligence prostitution.
Extortion letter trap
The victim is subjeced to police sexual extortion in the form of a seemingly private letter to the victim. The envelope containing the letter may look as if containing a love letter and the victim curiously opens the envelope which contains a demand for money and a threat that the extorter will otherwise contact the police and/or employer and accuse the victim of sex crime. Once the victim contacts the police does the police immediately accuse the victim of sex crime and commences interrogating the victim with deliberately fictious charges as fabricated by police intelligence. Since the victim has already received a seemingly genuine-looking extortion letter from police intelligence is she deceived into believing that someone actually accuses her of sex crime when in fact no one actually does. The victim is assigned a “defensive attorney” who advises the victim to sign a false confession and “sign a deal with the police to become a police agent so as to spy on real criminals” as of course leading to recruitment into intelligence prostitution.
Extortion is a particularly effective criminal method in that most potential victims do actually fall for extortion and hence is extortion also a highly effective intelligence recruitment method and in particular so sexual extortion but extortion on the basis of accusations of violent crime (especially if teenagers are falsely portrayed as plaintiffs) is also rather effective.
Extradition threat trap
A victim is in contact with online personas from other countries and the victim is typically unaware that these may be online entrapment operations. In such cases may a victim probably not fully understand that she in those situations need to abide by the law in the jurisdiction where she currently physically is, the law of the jurisdiction where the online persona is or claims to be is and possibly also the laws of her own nation when she is abroad. It becomes even more complex regarding federal nations with e.g. different ages of consent in different states within a federation. A victim may thus be bound by the law of the country where she is a citizen even when physically abroad which may be even more complex if she has two or more citizenships. Many countries have different ages of consent for different situations which makes it even more complex in terms of mock interrogations. US federal law imposes an international minimun age of consent of 15 for US citizens for sexual interaction when abroad. Many European countries have 14 as the age of consent which means that a US citizen while in the United States needs to abide by the age of consent in her jurisdiction of current location (e.g. age 17 in New York State) in terms of her choice of words while chatting with someone in Germany where the age of consent is 14, yet Germany has different ages of consent for different situations which makes things even more legally complex. If she thus is in Germany does she therefore have to abide by the international US age of consent of 15 despite the German age of consent being 14. If unaware of these tricky distinctions which apply to other aspects of sexual legislation as well (for instance may the police pretend to “suspect” international prostitution/trafficking whether buying or selling sexual services) and the victim may become called to a hearing by the police in her own country/jurisdiction in being mock-interrogated as part of international police cooperation. A victim may be surprised that police forces in different countries cooperate in running joint online entrapment operations whether or not in conformance with law and the police generally does not mind breaking the law for operational purposes as long as this is generally informally condoned by national prosecutors. A victim may furthermore likely not be aware to the degree as to the police in her own country as well as the police in other countries are ready to break the law for operational purposes. The victim may be called to a domestic police mock interrogation with the purpose of being asked to provide a false confession for an actual non-crime regarding an online chat with a persona in a different national or international jurisdiction. The victim may be faced with a mock threat of extradition (international or federal) and may perhaps not understand that international extradition is a complex judicial process that is not easily performed as international extradition typically requires formal and official legal charges of one of more quite severe statutory violations. This becomes even more complex when chatting with a person who is travelling abroad, whether for business, vacation or otherwise. LGBTQI victims are particularly vulnerable in online chats considering the widespread anti-LGBTQI animus among police forces in all countries and so do police in all countries consider it legitimate to operationally target a victim for merely being highly overtly LGBTQI. An extradition trap involves the victim being deliberately falsely told that she “will face extradition unless she makes a deal” with her being offered “recruitment as an agent of the police in” ostensible “return for the police in the other country dropping” the actually non-existent “international extradition demand”. An intelligence operative falsely claiming to represent the national police of another country may be present in the mock interrogation and may even present fake official-looking police identification documents from another country. All this is done with the purpose of creating a false impression that the victim risks prosecution abroad. In a federal nation may instead a federal police officer join the local/state police mock interrogation or the federal police itself may conduct the mock interrogation and overt/vocal LGBTQI victims are especially operationally targed for these purposes. Nevertheless is the ultimate purpose to extract an unfounded “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” and often for a statutory non-crime, with the purpose of sexually extorting the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is falsely made to believe that she faces prosecution and is operationally made to feel desperate and is operationally encouraged to leave the country. If she tries to leave the country at some time prior to a later scheduled mock interrogation will she however become arrested. This in turn will facilitate police sexual extortion against her (it will be claimed that “trying to escape the country” implies admitting guilt) in holding her in indefinite detention with daily interrogation harassment including police rape, all for the purpose of drawing her into intelligence prostitution.
Fairness operations exploit the victim’s sense of empathy, justice and morality. Virtually any virtue identified in the victim may thus become exploited in operation, seduction and interrogation and subsequent police sexual extortion.
Fake documents interrogation
Most victims are inclined to believe that police officers tell the truth and do not realize that the police deliberately telling lies and referring to non-existent documents are an effective interrogation technique for manipulatively extracting an unfounded “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” which in turn can be used to sexually and/or otherwise extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Fake law operations
Police sexually harass the victim by extrajudicially making the false appearance of this being law enforcement.
Fake police operations
A victim may become subjected to a fake police interrogation by non-police intelligence operatives using deliberately forged official-looking paperwork somewhat resembling official police documents. However, a careful examination will expose clear inconsistencies. If the victim chooses to go public with the “documentation” will the police claim that the forged “documents” were instead forged by the victim and not by the police and the victim may instead be accused of forgery, fraud and the like by the actual or real police who will rhetorically “threaten” the victim with prosecution for that unless the victim “cooperates” in “acknowledging wrongdoing” despite the victim having done nothing wrong or illegal. Fake police officers are typically unwilling or at least reluctant to show police IDs and that’s an easy way to expose fake police officers since intelligence operatives have been taught in intelligence training to avoid exposing even fictious identities. Fake police officers can typically easily be exposed by asking legal trick questions that will immediately show that they have never even visited police academy. The purpose of fake police operations are to delude the victim into believing that the victim is somehow in serious legal trouble and so the victim is manipulately deluded into emotionally desiring to discursively reconcile with the fake police officers in “acknowledging wrongdoing” despite not having done anything wrong or illegal. Once there is an extracted false “acknowledgement of wrongdoing” is the victim extorted into intelligence prostitution. If the fake police intelligence operatives fail to extract an “acknowledgement of wrongdoing” are they typically assigned to seduce the victim and if that too fails instead simply rape the victim. If even violent group rape for hours fails to coerce the victim to “agree” to intelligence recruitment is the victim released in the hope that the victim will file an official police complaint for having been raped by “the police”. After having filed an official police complaint is the victim instead accused of committing sexual misdemeanors against police officers and if the victim again does not agree to “acknowledge wrongdoing” may the victim even become executed so as to “avoid compromising a covert operation”.
There are various ways to extract a false confession. One way is to keep on asking the same question and/or repeating the same deliberately false premise until the victim begins to respond differently. Once the victim starts to respond differently can this be used against the victim by the police for further interrogation purposes. Iterative interrogation is based on the psychological insight that if a question and/or false premise is repeated a sufficient number of times will the victim start to respond differently in some way or another. E.g. may the victim become successfully provoked into anger and even fury in saying things that may subsequently be used against the victim by the police for further interrogation purposes or claiming that the victim is insane and/or dangerous or directly/indirectly sexually extorting the victim into intelligence prostitution. Trick questions are also common and some trick questions are double-edged in that whether the victim responds yes or no will the answer be “interpreted” against the victim in accordance with “police procedure” so as to “indicate guilt”. Trick questions may seem “innocent” and may even “nominally” be of a “procedural nature” as it is the nature of a trick question that the victim is typically unaware of the purpose of the question and is also unaware that it is a trick question. Refusal to answer questions or asking for a lawyer to be present may also be used to “indicate guilt” in accordance with “police procedure”.
False confession operations
False confession operations are about using various manipulative means to extract a false confession. Just as extracting a false confession during a single interrogation may be of an iterative nature (i.e. repeating the same question or false premise until the victim commences to respond differently) may iterative interrogation have a serial nature in that the same technique is repeated on serial occasions in a manner as intended to cause a trauma in the victim and thus make the victim more vulnerable to further attempts to extract a false confession. Traumas are well known to cause seemingly irrational and/or spontaneous behaviors and so causing and reinforcing a trauma is an effective technique in serial interrogation where different and mostly plainclothes officers/operatives/agents engage in mostly informal interrogation against the victim. The purpose is to provoke irrational behavior/utterances that may subsequently be used against the victim so as to sexually and/or otherwise extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
False confession sexual harassment trap
Police-organized sexual harassment with the purpose of informal interrogation in order to force a false confession is prominently deployed by the police so as to systemetically sexually harass law-abiding persons with overt LGBTQI lifestyles. The victim is regularly confronted (mostly by plainclothes officers/operatives/agents) by means of sexual harassment and is simultaneously more or less aggressively “accused” of socio-sexually inappropriate behavior.
False premise operations
False premise operations are about compelling the victim to accept a false premise in manipulatively deceiving the victim into wrongly believing that she herself has erred while also deceiving the victim into believing that illegal police intelligence activities (e.g. police organized anti-LGBTQI sexual harassment) is somehow “justified” for some reason or just normal and/or structural human behavior. This is a form of psychological warfare as intended to delude the victim into believing herself to be in the wrong despite certainly not doing anything illegal. The purpose of this is to permanently morally confuse the victim in preparation for interrogation so as to extract a false confession that in turn can be used for the purpose of sexually (and/or otherwise) extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
In Western countries are intelligence agencies specifically not permitted to organize public show trials and in part so due to the risk of publicly exposing an entire intelligence operation, specific intelligence operatives and most importantly general intelligence operational methods but also because Western intelligence agencies are nominally tasked with being guardians of the tenets of liberal democracy. Famous persons are an exception since it is allowed to organize a show trial so as to compromise e.g. a leading politician due to being an enemy agent. This force majeur exception has however been turned into a rule since it is now considered accepted in Western countries for domestic intelligence agencies to discredit a political or other public figure whether for resisting intelligence recruitment or literally for any other purpose such as as publicly discrediting a “disobedient” leading politician. Famous persons such as pop stars are typically extremely useful as seduction agents for intelligence agencies since humans of all genders are typically far more inclined to have sexual relations with a highly sexually attractive celebrity. A fame operation may therefore be designed to first make an extremely talented victim famous (i.e. a fame trap) and subsequently sexually and/or otherwise extort the person in “choosing between career and prosecution” in quite effectively extorting the victim into coercive intelligence recruitment.
The lure of fame is compelling to many or even most human beings and so offering a victim a public career of some kind such as a modelling career, a music contract or a political career is typically sufficient so as to lure a victim into sexual intercourse such as leading to commercial prostitution and subsequently intelligence prostitution.
A female from a traditional culture is seduced by a seduction agent. The sexual relationship is documented through hidden cameras. Another intelligence operative later approaches the female, shows intimate image of the encounter from hidden cameras and threatens to show them to her relatives. The victim consents to the extortion and agrees to spy on her relatives on behalf of the intelligence agency out of fear that her relatives would kill her for having had pre-marital/extra-marital sexual relations.
The victim is befriended by “a couple with children” (a heterocultural couple, same-sex couple or otherwise) who are all intelligence prostitutes. The victim is seduced by the couple and “their children” later join them in bed. The children become intimate with their parents in bed and this suddenly turns sexual. “The couple” and “their children” explain that this is all perfectly natural and consensual and the victim is subsequently seduced by the sexually experienced children. The next day is the victim arrested by the police and after confronted with photographic and video evidence is the victim given a choice between a criminal trial or accepting training to become an intelligence operative, although the victim at that point certainly is not told that this means becoming an enslaved prostitute and professional killer.
The victim encounters two intelligence operatives posing as a female couple. One is more beautiful and overtly interested in a threesome while the other is interested but not as much and instead a little jealous. The first says agrees to a threesome while second does not. If the victim does back off can the taped conversation later be used in a police confrontation to accuse the victim of sexual harassment and subsequently extract a forced “confession” of wrongdoing. If instead there is a threesome is the victim subsequently introduced to underage seduction agents below the age of consent who also enter the couple’s bed. The underage seduction agent(s) below the age of consent initiate sexual contact with the victim who is subsequently drawn into what seems to be an extraordinary familial sexual scene. Even if the victim physically and verbally rejects illegal sexual contact is the unilateral sexual contact still documented by operational surveillance cameras. The victim is later arrested by the police and confronted with photographic documentation and the victim is subsequently extorted into “cooperating with the police” as leading to intelligence recruitment and intelligence prostitution.
The victim encounters a handsome “father” with a cute teenage “son” above the age of consent. The victim is charmed by the two seduction agents and after becoming the third party to purportedly incestuous sexual relations is the victim manipulatively interrogated by the police. The police deceives the victim into falsely believing that the teenage boy is somehow actually below the age of consent and accuses the victim of both statutory rape and being an accessory to incestuous child sexual abuse. Once the victim is made to believe in this deliberate lie does the victim apologize for “making a mistake” and the victim is subsequently sexually extorted into intelligence prostitution.
The victim approaches someone whom seems interested in the victim. At some point does that person leave and the victim does not give up but comes along. If in a nightclub may the victim at that point become approached by an especially tall rape agent posing a bouncer. The bouncer will engage in informal interrogation although the victim is led to believe that this is for the purpose of deciding whether or not to expel the victim from the nightclub. The purpose is however to force some acknowledgement, apology or explaination of wrongdoing. The bouncer may use the “confession” to coerce the victim into a separate room where the victim is raped by the “bouncer”. If the pickup takes place elsewhere will the victim instead become approached by either uniformed security guards or uniformed police officers. The victim will become interrogated in some form or another with the purpose of coercing some kind of confession, apology, explaination, lying/denying or false blaming. The victim will be told that the victim will face criminal charges unless the victim “cooperates with the polices” such as signing a false confession of sexual misdemeanors (e.g. a fictional “agreement” with the prosecutor’s office), agrees to spy for the police (becoming “a police agent”) or signs some kind of “agreement” pertaining to intelligence recruitment.
An intelligence operative playing the role of a fraudster attempts to or actually commits fraud against the victim. The purpose is to either provoke the victim into filing a police complaint after which the police can harass the victim with mock interrogation so as to extract an unfounded “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” which can be used to extort the victim into intelligence prostitution. If the fraud is successful can the intelligence operative “fraudster” demand even more money such as by criminal extortion with the purpose of prostituting the victim commercially “to pay off the debt to the fraudster” and subsequently lure the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is deliberately subjected to experiences as intended to make the victim experience self-doubt. This may done by the victim being confronted by freaky-looking intelligence operatives in the hope that the victim will introject the unpleasant types and “feel like them”. The purpose is to undermine the victim’s belief in herself and thus soften her up for any kind of interrogation whether formal or informal in making her “acknowledge wrongdoing” so as to create “ground” for police sexual extortion into intelligence prostitution.
A seemingly friendly person (whether a uniformed police officer, an undercover police officer, an intelligence operative or an agent of the police) befriends the victim with the purpose of extracting a false confession such as mutually engaging in bragging on ostensibly friendly terms.
The victim is approached by one or more seemingly sympathetic intelligence/agents who befriend the victim. The victim is lured into a secluded place where the victim is collectively raped and coerced into intelligence prostitution.
Gang rape prostitution anti-LGBTQI trap
The police hires a criminal gang to rape and prostitute an LGBTQI victim. The purpose of the gang rape is to become a prelude to commercial prostitution as quickly leading to intelligence prostitition. Most police officers are corrupt and therefore have close relations with the criminal world and that is so in every country and that is the main reason why so few crimes are resolved and the police furthermore systematically sexually exploits both sexually attractive female victims of crime and sexually attractive LGBTQI victims of crime. The intelligence world has close ties with organized crime due to skilled criminals generally being considered as highly useful as intelligence operatives as highly intelligent persons with antisocial personality disorders are generally considered highly suitable as prospective intelligence operatives indeed. Intelligence training therefore stages difficult experiences as intended to trigger the development of psychopathic traits of personality.
The victim is befriended and seduced by two intelligence operatives posing asa gay male couple and subsequently introduces the victim to underage intelligence agents below the age of consents posing as children of ‘the couple’. The child(ren) become part of the sexual scene and the drugged victim is lured into illegal sex or at least sexually touched by at least one person below the age of consent. The victim is later arrested and extorted into intelligence recruitment and subsequently seduced and/or raped by police officers.
The victim is lured into a setting (e.g. an apartment or a cemetery) where the victim is gangraped. Once the victim files a police complaint will the victims instead find himself accused as the purported “prime suspect”. If he was raped by a teenage gang will the police accuse the victim of being a paedophile and he will be accused of sexually exploiting children. If he physically defended himself will the police accuse him of violent assault against children. If the victim was gangraped in an apartment will the victim be accused of being a prostitute in which case the police will demand sexual services from the victim. Whether through police sexual extortion or through police sexual exploitation is the purpose to draw the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Gay sex is typically quite easily accessible in the LGBTQI community or at least so for persons who are at least considered reasonable sexually attractive. The gay scene is therefore a conventient arena for intelligence recruitment. In countries where same-sex sexual intimacy is illegal is gay sex particularly effective for extortion purposes. Married men may be extorted after having sexual relations with a fellow male.
Gay pickup violence trap
The victim is lured into doing gay pickup in accordance with gay culture in a public park where gay/bisexual men meet each other. The victim initiates a conversation with a male seduction agent who reacts with homophobic violence against the victim. The victim files a complaint with the police and finds himself quickly accused of violent assault. Faced with those accusations and thinking that the homophobic system of justice will not do him justice does he choose to accept the police sexual extortion of coercing him into intelligence recruitment leading to intelligence prostitution.
Gay pickup homophobia trap
The victim is lured into doing gay pickup in accordance with gay culture in a public park where gay/bisexual men typically meet each other for sex. The victim iniates a conversation with a male seduction agent who reacts with homophobic outrage and threatens to physically attack the victim. The victim who calls his best “friend” who has been tasked with advicing the victim to file a complaint with the police. The victim subsequently finds himself accused of sexual harassment by the police who will try to extract a false confession in order to sexually extort the victim into intelligence recruitment leading to intelligence prostitution.
Gay pickup prostitution trap
The victim is lured into doring gay pickup in accordance with gay culture in a public park where gay/bisexual men meet each other. He starts speaking to a male in the park and soon does an intelligence operative posing as a pimp turn up and asks the victim to go away or else implicitly pay for the time spent. If the victim out of fear pays can the victim be accused of purchasing sexual services from a prostitute. If the victim starts arguing with the “pimp” can the victim later be accused of violent assault and/or sexual harassment. The “pimp” will try to force the victim into commercial prostitution. It’s an either/or operation where the victim in either case is put into trouble. The best thing he can do is to simply leave or ignore the intelligence pimp and the intelligence prostitute.
Gender policing is mostly deployed against sexually attractives females, sex workers and LGBTQI people. Gender policying involves the police, intelligence operatives or simply police agents trying to falsely persuade the victim that her public gender and sexual expression are somehow intrinsically “criminal”. Bullying is systematically deployed and as a bullied person will typically internalize the bullying and introject elements of the bullies may she thus also come accept the description of her gender/sexuality as ostensibly “criminal”. Once she has been bullied/humiliated/harassed into “apologizing” and/or “explaining” is this treated as a confession and the victim is threatened with faux prosecution in order so as to sexually exploit her and coercively recruit her into intelligence prostitution
The victim is either an LGBTQI person (e.g. a non-binary transgender person), an active feminist or simply someone with a gender that does not conform to stereotypical binary genders as commonly associated with sexual anatomy. Despite having committed no illegal act whatsoever is the victim interrogated either by the police or by some proxy and accused of being “a sex criminal”. The purpose is to provoke a sense of guilt in a highly conscientious human person and so extract a “confession” of wrongdoing such as in the form of a socially seemingly convenient polite apology or a promise “not to do it again”. Once this is secured is the victim arrested and subjected to further interrogation and is falsely “offered a deal” whereby the victim “will not be prosecuted” for the acknowledged non-crime. Once the victim agrees is the victim either seduced and/or raped and thus effectively drawn into intelligence prostitution.
A police officer (often a physically attractive woman) pretends to be on the side of the victim in order to gain the confidence of the victim and force a false confession by means of manipulative conversation.
The victim is enticed into sex with a sexually easily accessible “grandparent” who subsequently lures the victim into sex with the grandparent’s “grandchildren” as well. This is subsequently used for the purpose of police extortion which is used to drag the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is suddenly greeted by either an unknown person or unknown persons of any age/gender who behave as if they already know the victim. The victim does not know the greeters but if the victim is friendly and sociable might the victim respond as if the victim already knew the greeting provocateur(s). If so might the victim become interrogated by the police under deliberately false pretenses. Once the victim has denied knowing the greeting provocateur(s) will the victim become falsely accused of committing sexual offences either together with the provocateur(s) or against the provocateur(s). The police has however videotaped the greeting and ensuing conversation which might include hugging and which due to the successful greeting provocation falsely indicate the victim already knowing the greeting provocateur(s) due to the victim simply being friendly and sociable with strangers. The police shows the victim the video recording and claims that the victim has been caught lying to the police and falsely claims that the victim has somehow destroyed her own legal credibility in lying being treated by the legal system as an indicator of guilt. The victim is deceived into believing that “her only chance” is to “confess” a crime which she has simply never committed (a present “lawyer” might advise her to do so!) and that the police “might be forgiving” once a false “confession” has been extracted and signed and once her “cooperation with the police” has “been fully ensured”. At this stage is the victim persuaded to sign a form “to become a police agent” so as to “bust the real criminals”. The signed form might however also include a false confession and the victim thinks that she makes “a good deal” by the police offering her “a way out of a misunderstanding” when in fact she is being deliberately sexually extorted into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is contacted over social media by someone seemingly of ambiguous age and is asked to send nudie pictures and/or is lured into cybersex. There is actually an adult police officer behind the social media account.
The victim is enticed, induced and/or lured into group sex leading to becoming subjected to group rape and the victim is subsequently forced into intelligence prostitution.
Group seduction by underage persons
The victim is enticed and seduced by a group of young persons below the age of consent who are all underage seduction agents. This of course enables the police to subsquently extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Group sex operations
The victim is lured into participation in group sex with intelligence operatives, such as with “a group of teenagers”, with “a couple”, in a sexual subculture or with “friends”. Afterwards is the victim interrogated by the police under deliberately false pretenses. Group sex offers the police opportunities for a variety of deliberately false and purportedly “collective” accusations and subsequent extracted “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” which the police will claim constitute a “confession” and through which the police will attempt to extort the victim into intelligence prostitution. Group sex and especially if occurring on serial occasions is also prominently used to lure victims into simply agreeing to become intelligence seduction agents “due to the fun of it.”
Group sex prostitution charges
The victim may be lured into group sex with intelligence operatives whom s/he does not know. This is particularly risky if the victim does not know the other participants since the police may later claim that one or more participants were sex workers. The police may knowingly without basis accuse the victim of pimping, purchasing sexual services and may deliberately falsely claim that a participant was below the age of consent. However this is particulary effective in extorting a victim “to consent” to intelligence recruitment since most victims are afraid of their family, relatives and friends “finding out”, e.g. risking divorce, becoming fired or becoming publicly exposed as LGBTQI, BDSM etc.
Guilt inducement operations
The victim is psychologically manipulated (e.g. by stating false premises) into believing that the victim has done something wrong when in fact the victim has done nothing wrong whatsoever. The interrogator takes advantage of the conscientious nature of the victim in extracting some kind of false “acknowledgement of wrongdoing” such as in the form of an apology, an “explanation”, lying/denying or falsely blaming others and this is treated by the police as a purported “confession” which in turn is deployed for police sexual extortion so as to lure the victim into intelligence prostitution.
A victim and in particular an LGBTQI victim may become subjected to systematic harassment in order so as to negatively influence the behavior of the victim and thus provoke the victim into ill-advised behaviors such as moderate physical violence, legally problematic verbal outbursts and sexually inappropriate behaviors. Role models are powerful and so sexually harassing an anatomically male LGBTQI person is done with the purpose of influencing the victim into himself engaging in sexual harassment. The purpose is to break down the personal barriers of the victim and this is especially effective if the victim is unaware that he is being subjected to coercive “protective” intelligence recruitment. Once the victim has been provoked into ill-advised behavior will the police engage in mock interrogation and threaten the victim with mock prosecution. This is so as the purpose is always intelligence recruitment although police intelligence does not mind destroying the victim’s life in the process.
The victim tells ‘friends’ about her being subjected to police-organized sexual harassment, sexual entrapment and sexual extortion. The ‘friends’ encourage her to simply ignore the police and instead embrace sexual pleasure irrespective of police sexual entrapment. Multiple ‘friends’ tell her the same thing as the purpose is to facilitate sexual entrapment by making the victim ignore the real dangers inherent to sexual entrapment. By being encouraged to ignore dangerous reality is the victim made more vulnerable to sexual entrapment which in turn makes her more vulnerable to police sexual extortion for the purpose of coercing the victim into intelligence prostititution. Being promiscuous also presents significant dangers in terms of risk becoming raped, enslaved & trafficked, commercially prostituted and also being coerced into intelligence prostitution.
The victim encounters a decoy seduction agent who gives the victim a hint of being romantically and/or sexually interested in the victim. The victim acts on the hint such as engaging in unilateral kissing of the decoy agent, intimately touching the decoy agent or stating something sexually explicit to the decoy seduction agent. However, the unilateral kiss or verbal sexual advance is ambiguously received. Later is the victim interrogated by the police who accuses the victim of sexual harassment. The victim explains that he is sorry and that this was all a misunderstanding. “The explanation” is treated by the police as if it were a criminal confession and used to sexually extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim meets a lovely or otherwise attractive person whom s/he takes for a date such as a dinner. Later does a person posing as a pimp turn up and demand exorbitant payment for the time spent together. The victim either pays in which case the victim is subsequently extorted by the police into intelligence prostitution for paying for prostitution or is forced “to pay the debt to the pimp” by means of prostituting herself into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is frequently sexually harassed by an intelligence agent posing as an aggressive teenage prostitute high on heroin. Once the victim files a complaint is the victim however falsely accused of various sexual crimes for the purpose of the police extracting an “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” of some kind which is subsequently deployed by the police for sexually extorting the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The unsuspecting victim has sexual intercourse with someone whom s/he assumes is a casual sex partners. The victim is subsquently harassed by a person claiming to be a pimp who threatens and extorts the victim. Either does the victim pay the pimp in which case the victim will become arrested, interrogated, extorted and sexually abused by the police as leading to intelligence prostitution or the victim refuses to pay the pimp and the victim is subsequently raped by the pimp and forced into commercial prostitution “so as to repay the debt” with the purpose of drawing the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is subjected to hostile interrogation by the police with the purpose of provoking the victim into responding with verbal anger. This has two purposes, the first is to provoke the victim into a false confession by admitting a circumstance which the police subsequently disingenously claims is a sex crime. The second purpose is to be able to claim that the victim is hostile, “dangerous”, a threat to public order, in contempt of justice and so on in order to hold the person in temporary custody for further questioning or by claiming that the victim is mentally ill in order so as to turn over the victim to psychiatric interrogation whereby the victim a confession of sexual wrongdoing is extracted from the victim and which is subsequently used by the police for the purpose of exorting the victim into recruitment into what later turns out to be inteligence prostitution.
The victim is lured into having sex with a usually female seduction agent from the intelligence community who seemingly seeks infidelity. There is a scene of purported marital jealousy in subsequently the purported “husband” threatening and extorting the victim with the purpose of subjecting the victim to commercial prostitution as leading to intelligence prostitution.
Operations of seduction and extortion are intended to provoke the person to perform illegal contact. It is thus essential to keep in mind that most forms of physical contact are legal (including with children below the age of consent). It is thus essential to keep all behaviors strictly legal in making sure that any physical, digital and verbal contact is strictly legal indeed and irrespectively so of the age of the person with whom one is in contact.
Illegal Pornography trap
The victim is lured into downloading pornography with illegal, yet perhaps seemingly legal content. The victim is subsequently arrested and offered an ostensible “plea bargain” to the effect that he will not be prosecuted if she “agrees” to becomes an intelligence agent.
Imaginary complaints accusation against LGBTQI persons
Uniformed and plainclothes interrogators tell the LGBTQI person that there are many persons of any particular or no gender/age who are dissatisfied with and complain about being approached/contacted/conversed by the victim during public cruising. This is despite the victim herself never having received any such complaint while cruising. This exploits fears of rejection, fears of suffering futher hostility/violence as well as the conscientious nature of the victim victim who strongly wishes to maintain strictly ethical behavior and particularly so while doing public cruising.
Imaginary plaintiff trap
The victim is interrogated and told that there is a plaintiff who consider herself as having been subjected to sexual harassment by the victim. This is especially effective if forming part of a formal police interrogation at a police station as the naive victim does not understand that unethical police interrogation methods include stating deliberately false premises such as claiming that there is a plaintiff when in fact there is none whatsoever. The purpose is to appeal to the victim’s sense of empathy and thus compel the victim to directly/indirectly admit some kind of “wrongdoing” even if a non-crime and *”promise not to do it again” which legally may count as a confession. The purpose is to create a basis for police sexual extortion whereby the person may be compelled to “accept” intelligence recruitment which later turns out to involve intelligence prostitution as well.
Incest operations involves involving the victim befriending “a family” which turns out quite wildly “incestuous”. The participation of an non-relative in incestuos group sex is typically completely legal in most jurisdictions provided that everyone involved is above the age of consent. However, the victim is subsequently arrested and interrogated by the police and accused of being a criminal accomplice to illegal incest. Although no one is prosecuted as an accessory to incest above the age of consent is it quite plausible and persuasive indeed when the victim is confronted by the police and accused of being “an accessory to incest”. The victim is deceived into believing that s/he has committed a crime that could lead to years in prison and is furthermore afraid of this affair becoming public knowledge, causing destruction of marriage and loss of friends. Although usually not even a crime and certainly not prosecutable is even the fear of becoming exposed as complicit in above the age of consent incest of others sufficient to compel the victim to accept intelligence recruitment which turns out to also involve intelligence prostitution.
Incommunicado operations have three main purposes, 1) manipulate the victim into falling in love with the absent seduction agent, 2) lure the victim into stalking the absent seduction agent and 3) for the police to present deliberately fictious intelligence fabricated accusations which may even seem slightly credible to the victim as an explanation for why the seduction agent suddenly became incommunicado. Online incommunicado operations are common in social media such as Facebook messaging, mobile texting and dating websites where right in a middle of a growing relation does the seduction agent claim to not to have time with communication and the intention is to emotionally manipulate the victim into online stalking. One method is for the intelligence agency is to let online personas stalk the victim so as to create an impression in the victim that this is somehow socially accepted and legally permitted behavior. In all cases is the purpose ultimately for the police to sexually extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim has been subjected to a fake formal police interrogation where she has been asked to “confess” a non-crime as if it were a crime. The interrogation harassment did however fail to extract an “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” of any kind and so operational harassment continues as designed to give the victim a sense that “everyone knows about her” and “now consider her to be social pariah”. The victim may even be told about non-existent rumors about her on social media or non-existent gossip IRL. The purpose of infamy operations is first to deter the victim from becoming a wistleblower and second to create a sense of guilt which will make it easier to extract some kind of unfounded “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” which subsequently may be used by the police or others to extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
An intelligence seduction agent manipulates the victim into falling in love. In exploiting those emotions is the victim subsequently nominally “voluntarily” recruited into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is lured into sexual infidelity by an intelligence seduction agent. The victim is later confronted with photographic and video “evidence” and coerced into intelligence recruitment through intelligence extortion by an intelligence operative claiming to work for a domestic national security agency as part of the national police force. The victim is typically threatened that the intelligence service will tell the victim’s spouse, parents, children, siblings, friends etc. This is especially effective with persons from more more traditional cultures.
Any human person including a criminal, a legal minor, a healthcare employee, a neighbor or even just a random citizen can become recruited by the police into becoming an informal police interrogator. The interrogation usually takes the form of sexual harassment and the victim is unaware that it is a police interrogation. Informal interrogations in the form of sexual harassment and typically so by persons of some authority there (e.g. a security guard, a pimp or an employee/owner of an establishment) frequently takes place in various spatial contexts as part of continuous police-organized sexual harassment. Informal interrogators are often undercover police officers in other professional social roles.
The victim is manipulatively insulted with the purpose of provoking a heated argument so as to be able to subsequently ban the person from frequenting that place, such as as supermarket. The victim can subsequently become discredited and easier victimized once the victim has been banned from a certain establishment. This is especially used against LGBTQI persons.
Intelligence training harassment
Coercive intelligence recruitment is typically the first phase in intelligence training for a a coercively recruited victim. Intelligence training mostly takes places in special intelligence training cities where shop clerks and public sector employees are all recruited intelligence agents, yet may take place in any location. The purpose of intelligence training is to subject the victim to difficult experiences which will prepare the victim for surviving while operating in foreign environments in hostile lands as an intelligence operative on a covert mission. Coercive recruitment operations may go on for a long period of time on the basis of the well-founded assumption that the victim will eventually perform some “error” which will enable the police to sexually and/or otherwise extort the victim into intelligence prostitution. The persistency in a prolonged coercive recruitment compaign would seem inexplicable were it not that this was regarded as part and parcel of intelligence training which may thus commence even long before the victim is actually coercively recruited into intelligence prostitution.
Intergenerational confession trap
Seduction agents of all ages are tragically enslaved and pervasively sexually exploited in the intelligence world. The intelligence agency will on numerous occasions dispatch extremely beautiful child seduction agents below the age of consent and especially in group to contact the victim in public space so as to manipulatively deceive the victim into believing that the victim has such a sexual preference when in fact the victim probably does not have any such preference whatsoever. This is effective due to the fact that such intergenerational attraction is extremely common in the adult population as ranging on a spectrum from very infrequent such attraction to diagnosable sexual preference although often to a significant degree sexually sublimated into social desire for parenthood, family life, family values, religion etc. The purpose is to make the confused victim “confess” such a usually non-existent preference and subsequently use this “confession” for sexual extortion purposes by threatening “to tell others about it” so as to thus sexually exort the victim into intelligence prostitution. A confused victim may also tell psychiatry about those thoughts in which case the victim may be denied civil rights and civil liberties, including becoming coercively misdiagnosed, deprived of adult legal status and incarcerated as an ostensible threat to public safety. The victim is subsequently offered release from incarceration provided that the victim signs on to intelligence recruitment which as it turns out includes intelligence prostititution.
Intergenerational sociality operations
Intergenerational sociality operations are deployed for the purpose of socially provoking some kind of friendly, yet fully legal social physical contact between the victim and one or more persons below the age of consent. Despite most such physical contact being fully legal may police and prosecutor sexually harass a victim with mock accusations and mock charges in claiming that the physical contact was somehow “illegal” in nature. While there is no chance of convicting anyone for acting legally in social contact is the purpose to provoke the victim into saying something which may be deployed as a false confession against the victim. There are two types of intergenerational sociality traps; either when other adults are present or in public space with dispatched intelligence operatives below the age of consent being tasked with approaching, conversing and hugging a victim. The first type is typically in the context of an adult honey trap where the victim is also drawn into a semi-parental role. The second type is performed with the purpose of seeking to incarcerate the victim in deliberately falsely claiming that the victim is a threat to public safety and later offer the victim release provided that the victim “agrees to” intelligence recruitment as inexorably leading to intelligence prostitution as well.
Interrogation harassment campaign
The victim is serially subjected to formal/informal interrogation in multiple locations, including in supermarkets, by strangers in the street, by facebook personas, by public sector employees, by security guards, by police whether uniformed or plainclothes and so on and so forth. The purpose is to provoke the victim into doing/saying something that she otherwise would probably not do or say. Once the victim has said/done something that can be used against the victim is the victim subjected to further interrogation harassment so as to sexually extort her into intelligence prostitution. Since most intelligence operatives (including as participants in coercive recruitment operations) are forced to work without pay may an intelligence interrogation harassment campaign continue for a considerable period of time if the victim is deemed especially “attractive” and “valuable” as an operative object of coercive intelligence recruitment.
Interrogation rape trap
The victim is manipulately deceived by the police into believing that the victim has admitted to a circumstance which instead is rather a non-crime. The purpose is to press the victim into having sex with the police “in order to be released from the police station”. The victim as it turns out is instead raped by intelligence operatives who are either actual police officers or claiming to be police officers and the victim is made to believe that the prosecutor’s office will press charges against the victim if the victim complains about the police rape against the victim. The purpose of this is to confuse the victim into believing that the police can somehow force the victim into accepting “an offer” from the police of of recruitment as “a police agent”, a euphemism for what turns out to be intelligence prostitution.
Deliberately interrupting a victim have different operational purposes. In a formal police interrogation could it be used so as to provoke the victim into saying something that the victim did not intend to say. Interrupting a victim could be done in order so to provoke the victim into uncontrollable anger in doing/saying something that the police could later use against the victim in deceiving the victim into “admitting wrongdoing” despite the police knowing full well that no crime was committed. A subtle interruption of sort could also produce a change in social situation, e.g. in a flirt or in a sexual interaction and that subtle interruption could later be used by the police in deceiving the victim into wrongly believing that she committed a crime. Once an unfounded “acknowledgement of wrongdoing” has been extracted is this used to sexually extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Intimidation by Dog persons
Deploying intimidating Dog persons to deter an LGBTQI victim from living openly as herself in public space. Once attacked by a dog may the LGBTQI victim file a police complaint following which the victim is accused of sexual assault and cruelty to animals. The victim is interrogated by the police and agressively accused of wrongdoing with the purpose of forcing a false “confession” of wrongdoing such as an apology or saying that “I will never do that again” or assuming some “responsibility” for the incident.
A person is exposed to an experience whether a deliberately designed experience, a seemingly innocent conversation with a close friend or otherwise an experience of some sort as designed and intended to compel the victim to introject elements of social behaviors/emotions/structures of others such as through imitation of the victim as intended to make the victim think of herself and another person as “similar” so as facilitate substantial behavioral introjection. This is typically done so as to provoke a victim into committing a criminal misdemeanor, confess to wrongdoing in some way or another or otherwise break down personal barriers so as to make the victim more talkative such as preparation for “friendly” interrogation or simply make the person more vulnerable to something or someone.
Claiming to “investigate” what the police full well knows are non-crimes is a very common pretext/excuse for the police to sexually and/or otherwise harass an LGBTQI person or any other human person deemed “suitable” for coercive intelligence recruitment. Since the police has substantial legal leeway in opening “investigations” and maintaining open-ended “investigations” that may literally go on for years are investigation & interrogation used as legal pretexts/excuses for systematic police sexual harassment in the form of illegal sexual entrapment intelligence operations and systematic provokation-interrogation by plainclothes undercover agents and particularly so against sexually attractive persons with overt LGBTQI lifestyles. In practice may the police sexually and otherwise harass any person for any period of time with complete impunity as police officers are virtually never prosecuted for sexually or otherwise harassing anyone and certainly not so while “in line of duty”. Although the police habitually commits crimes in the process do they do so in a manner in which they do not really risk prosecution as these actually completely illegal activities are explicitly/implicity approved by the prosecutor’s office and most importantly sanctioned by the national intelligence community as the main gateway for coercive domestic intelligence recruitment. Outside of LGBTQI-friendly urban special zones such as Tel Aviv and the San Fransisco Bay Area can sexually attractive LGBTQI persons even in liberal democracies still not live freely and safely in the open in terms of designing/performing their own individualized genders for which they will immediately become targed in becoming systematically sexually and otherwise harassed by the police, usually plainclothes undercover operatives. The reason this is so is because sexually attractive persons with overt LGBTQI lifestyles due to their individual courage are deemed so extremely suitable for coercive intelligence recruitment as prospective intelligence operatives. There is thus no country on Earth where sexually attractive persons with overt LGBTQI lifestyles are not persecuted by the police and its “partners” in intelligence and the public sector, including the system of justice, psychiatry and social services as well as private sector “partners” and especially so owners and employees of nightclubs and supermarkets and particularly security guards.
“Invisible” intelligence brothel operations
Almost any place, establishment or venue may become discreetly turned into a public space intelligence brothel where multiple decoy intelligence operatives of one, two or multiple genders are deployed and even regularly so under an extended period of time. E.g. may a pub, nightclub, restaurant, shopping mall, street, public square or even police waiting room temporarily become relatively discreetly turned into an intelligence prostitution venue. The security guard or other person working there is a recruited agent or a deployed intelligence operative in a covert role as an intelligence pimp. The purpose of the decoys are to provoke the victim into behaviors (acts and/or utterances) for which the victim may subsequently become confronted and interrogated by a person “in charge”. The purpose is in any case to provoke the victim into doing/saying something that can later be claimed to be a “crime”, a “mistake” or a “misunderstanding” for which the victim herself is subsequently sexually abused by a rape agent and physically coerced into commercial prostitution as leading to intelligence prostitution. The victim can also be threatened and interrogated by the police who may accuse the victim of any sexual misdemeanor for the purpose of extracting a false confession, including purchasing commercial sexual intercourse, seeking to sell commercial services, sexual harassment, sexual abuse or criminal intent of some kind or another such as planning an prostitution racket. Once the victim has become successfully provoked into discursively conciliatory language towards the interrogator is this interpreted as “a confession” and instantly or later used by the police to sexually (and/or otherwise) extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is deliberately placed in a situation so enticing that the victim would find it difficult to say no. This is a common negotiation technique that is also effective in sexual entrapment operations.
Intelligence operatives perform one or more acts as observable to the victim, acts which are intended to consciously/subconsciously inspire and subsequently mislead the victim into doing something which she would otherwise not do and so will likely regret once confronted by informal/formal interrogators. Once the victim has expressed regret for acting mistakenly does the victim become vulnerable to police sexual extortion as intended to pressure the victim inte intelligence prostitution.
The victim is serially subjected multiple/many times to the same offensive behavior by different agents provocateurs whether online and/or IRL. The insult is typically related to some kind of structural prejudice and/or structural oppression in serially victimizing the victim. The purpose is to bring the the victim into an emotional state where the victim emotionally thinks that “enough is enough”. Once this is achieved is the next task to provoke the victim into uncontrollable anger so that the victim will speak/behave/text in an ill-advised manner which subsequently may be used by the police for deliberately falsely claiming that the victim committed a crime, extract an unfounded “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” of some kind and use that to extort the victim into what turns out to be intelligence prostitution by “offering a deal”.
The victim flirtatiously converses with a dispatched seduction agent. At some point does another agent appear who requests to speak with the seduction agent. The victim is left uncomfortable with the feeling that the second agent subsequently “warned” the first agent as if the victim were dangerous, a social outcast or “a sexual deviant”. The purpose is to provoke irrational emotions in the victim in compelling the victim to become too self-critical as a sort of depressive reaction. The idea is to make the victim think that s/he has somehow done something wrong as the interruption typically provokes a brief sense of grief and sense of personal rejection. The intention is to compel the victim into acting, speaking and thinking irrationally in an ill-advised manner which may later be deployed against the victim for purposes of softening up the victim for mock accusations, mock interrogations and ultimately coercive intelligence recruitment. This may include police intelligence accusing the victim of behaving “illegally” towards the seduction agent on the assumption that the interruption may have provoked the victim into thinking that he may have “somehow done something wrong”. Bad conscience is recognized as highly helpful by police interrogators in extracting a false confession so as to subsequently be used against the victim for purposes of extorting the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Introjection operations are performed with the purpose of compelling the victim into introjecting elements of a dispatched agent such as inspiring the victim into feeling unseemly, unworthy, courageous, sexually attractive and the like; all with the purpose of somehow influencing the behavior of the victim in ways that run counter to the interests of the victim and hence become able to somehow extort a victim into intelligence prostitution. Introjection operations are often performed as a form of bullying with the purpose of breaking down the will of the victim and hence make the victim more amenable to submit to coercive intelligence recruitment.
Investigational compartmentalization trap
A common way for police intelligence to frame an innocent is investigational compartmentalization. By technically creating a new investigation and separating it from the larger surveillance/entrapment operation is police intelligence able to fabricate evidence by deliberately pretending to misunderstand the victim (e.g. by means of feigning “ignorance” and intentional anti-LGBQI prejudice) as well as extorting others into providing false witness. This is standard procedure in preparation for a police intelligence mock trial. The larger surveillance/entrapment operation is classified as “secret” which means that police intelligence is technically able to withhold evidence although clearly at the same time thus committing a serious crime in deliberately trying to convict someone they already know is fully innocent and doing so by means of deliberately withholding evidence from the larger surveillance/entrapment operation. Since police intelligence is composed of police officers who have received intelligence training are they personally unconcerned with law abidance since they themselves usually cannot be prosecuted in ordinary courts of laws as prosecutors are protectively recruited by police intelligence with its symbiotic relationship with organized crime. Police intelligence is of course aware that the victim is innocent as the purpose is to gain some kind of judicial leverage over the victim in order so as to be able to extort the victim into coercive intelligence recruitment and thus inevitably also intelligence prostitution. Common procedure is threatening and frightening a victim with prison or becoming sentenced to psychiatric incarceration. If a victim becomes incarcerated will police intelligence “offer the victim release in return for recruitment to police intelligence”. The victim can however not be convicted in a police intelligence mock trial unless first aknowledging criminal liability. Recorded surveillance operations are typically performed with the purpose of extracting a taped statement where the victim somehow is psychologically manipulated into falsely assuming criminal liability despite being fully innocent such as for example by politely apologizing despite not in any sense having done any wrong. A victim needs a good and reliable defense attorney who is not a police agent and who will focus on of extracting the full secret investigation from the national police surveillance database.
The victim is subjected to what seems like an expression of interpersonal intimate interest (whether through chatting online, IRL conversation, through texting, video chat or phone converation) on the part of a person who is actually an intelligence operative. The purpose of this is to lure the victim into something that she had not intended in the first place. Male victims are typically deliberately provoked into behaviors are intentionally misconstrued by the police as stalking, molestation, sexual harassment, etc. A female victim is typically deceived into thinking that this is a person who truly appreciates her and whom she therefore becomes romantically interested in. The female victim is lured into sex with the rape agent who drugs her & drags her into commercial prostitution and subsequently intelligence prostitution. The male victim is interrogated by the police and provoked into blaming/denying/lying, provoked into “admitting acting wrongly”, and/or provoked into “promising not to do it again” and these provoked utterances on the part of the victim are used by the police to claim that the victim has “confessed a crime”. The victim is threatened with “police prosecution” despite the police having no such powers and is subseqeuently sexually extorted into intelligence prostitution.
Jealous husband trap
The victim speaks with a woman and the victim is suddenly verbally attacked by a nearby man claiming to be her husband. The victim is accused by the “husband” of sexual misdemeanors and threatened with physical violence unless the victim “apologizes”. The “apology” is taped and the police subsequently appears to “interrogate” the victim. The police claims that the apology is a confession of a legal infringement, despite the fact that the victim neither committed a crime nor confessed a crime. What may technically count as a confession of a non-crime is subsequently used to extort the naive victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is deceived into a legal process which the victim believes is about “clearing the name” of the victim but whose purpose is instead to draw the victim into interrogation and formal legal proceedings that in turn can be used to manipulate the victim into “agreeing to a deal”, namely intelligence recruitment as leading to intelligence recruitment.
Kiddie operations in public space involve the victim becoming contacted by child intelligence operatives. The children are typically friendly and inquisitive in asking the victim questions. Contact may be initiated online and/or IRL. The purpose is to surprise the victim and lure the victim into social behaviors and/or conversations that may later be “questioned” as “mistaken”. If the victim is provoked into doing/saying something (e.g. an angry outburst or answering questions about sexuality, anatomy and reproduction) although certainly not illegal may that be wielded by the police against the victim as an excuse for interrogation harassment and the police will try to pressure the victim into a polite, yet certainly unwarranted “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” such as an apology, an explanation or “a promise not to do it again”. Once achieved will the police deliberately falsely claim that the victim has confessed a crime and subsequently sexually extort the victim into intelligence prostitution. The police may typically invent “special rules” against the law-abiding victim in treating the victim as if the victim were a released sex criminal on probation under special restrictions. While the police may give instructions to citizens so as to maintain public order has the police no authority to create special rules for any citizen whether LGBTQI or otherwise.
Kiddie porn registered mail trap
The victim is notified by the local postal office that she has received a registered mail in the form of an envelop or a box which is actually illegally sent by police officers and/or intelligence operatives. The victim has not ordered the envelop or box but it looks like it comes from a trusted sender such as seemingly officially from the police. The police may have offered the victim to review ostensible “evidence” from an ostensible “criminal investigation” against the victim such as purported video tapes with a non-existing “plaintiff”. The victim is immediately arrested by the police after accepting the box or envelop at the postal office. The victim is aggressively accused by the police of being a sexual deviant and a sex criminal and is “offered a way out” by “a good cop” in the form of becoming a police agent, meaning actually intelligence prostitution.
Kids’ chase play trap
The legally adult victim is somehow semiotically contacted by a group of children whom the victim is unaware are professional intelligence child prostitute seduction agents. They may collectively giggle at the sight of the victim and boisterously run away from the adult victim. This may be repeated on different occasions even on the same day with different groups of children and the purpose is always to provoke the victim into responding in kind to this deliberate operational provocation in simply playing with the children by spontaneously and playfully pretending to chase them as if playing with children whom she already knows. If the adult victim does engage in playful chase may the adult victim become contacted by the police who will accuse the victim of attempting sexual assault and even “intending to rape” pre-pubescent children. While the victim certainly did not do anything illegal will the police psychologically pressure the victim for a polite implicit/explicit, yet certainly unwarranted “acknowledgement of wrongdoing” of some kind whether an apology, an explanation or “a promise not to do it again”. Once this is achieved by the police will the police claim to the victim that the victim has ostensibly “confessed a crime” and “admitted criminal intentions” and the victim is arrested and told that the victim “will face many years in jail” unless the victim “signs a confession” for what is legally speaking a non-crime. However she is made to feel that she “will be forgiven” if she signs the false “confession” for a non-crime. Once she has become psychologically manipulated into signing the false “confession” is she sexually extorted into intelligence prostitution.
A legal minor below the age of consent who is close to the victim such as the victim’s own child, grandchild etc. is seduced by intelligence prostitutes and turned into an intelligence child prostitute. The adult victim is drugged and subsquently seduced by the now sexually experienced child. Such seduction may be entirely non-consensual such as touching the adult victim’s phallus while the victim is asleep. Photographic evidence may still be incriminating and so the victim is extorted by the police into intelligence prostitution.
Last bus trap
The victim is planning to travel home at night or in the evening after dark but is deliberately distracted by intelligence operatives from doing so and therefore misses the very transpartional means that are supposed to take her home. Criminal youth gangs are paid or recruited into raping the victim in order to commercially prostitute her. Once the victim has been coerced into commercial prostitution is the victim sold, coerced, “liberated” into or “upgraded” into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is subjected to numerous criminal acts on the part of intelligence operatives which cause the victim to file multiple lawsuits. The fact that the victim has filed multiple lawsuits is subsequently used to claim that the victim is mentally ill as this is one of the psychiatric criteria used detect mental illness. This opens the way for psychiatric harassment, psychiatric interrogation and police extortion leading recruitment into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is accused of a dummy misdemeanor and uses the assistance of her lawyer who has already for this mission become recruited as a police agent. The lawyer encourages the victim to confide any subjective “wrongdoing” of hers to him when in fact the conversation is taped by the police. The task of the lawyer is to provoke or convince the victim into “confessing” an act of a sexual nature, something which can subsequently be used for police extortion against the victim. If the lawyer participates in police interrogation is this construed as implicit confession of guilt and the lawyer is instructed to mislead the victim during the course of the police interrogation with the purpose of tricking the victim into “admitting a circumstance” which subsequently can be used for police sexual extortion for the purpose of intelligence recruitment as leading to intelligence prostitution.
Lesbian operations exploit the typically higher degree of intimacy among females but are also used to lure males into a threesomes. The purpose may be to extort the victim by threatening to tell her relatives such the victim’s spouse, parent or sibling and this is particularly effective in many traditional cultures. Another purpose is to lure the victim into having sexual relations with intelligence prostitutes below the age of consent posing as children of the “couple” or person and subsequently deploy agents in police uniform to extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Letter dispute trap
A letter is sent to the victim as a deliberate and premeditated provocation. The letter may be fake or be an actual official letter. The purpose is to draw the victim into some kind of “dispute” over honor where the victim will “want to clear his name” from the provocation accusations. The purpose is to create an opportunity for “settling the issue by sex” or “making a deal” whereby the victim signs something, agrees to something or is ostensibly “saved by someone”. The purpose is initially to provoke the victim into sending his own angry letter in response. As in all coercive recruitment operations is the purpose to lure the victim into one way or another becoming drawn into intelligence prostitution without actually wanting so.
Sending unsolicited physical letters as relating to sexual issues is a form of sexual harassment and the police may use “fake letter” traps (e.g. letters of sexual extortion as sent by police officers yet not in their own names), extra-judicial official-looking police letters and the like in order to sexually harass the victim for being gay/lesbian/pan, transgender, transage etc. in trying to stigmatize the law-abiding very being of the victim as ostensibly “criminal” with the purpose of making the victim think that she is “in danger” of prosecution, that the police will eventually succeed in framing her, that the police will fabricate evidence, that the police will succeed in otherwise incarcerating her, that the police will sexually molest her in her home, that she has herself to blame, that there is something wrong with her, that it is her own fault and so on and so forth. The psychologal purpose is to somehow compel the victim to “acknowledge wrongdoing” without basis and then use that against the victim to declare the victim “mentally ill”, a “threat to public safety”, “sexually deviant” and the like as well as of course at some stage sexually extorting the victim into intelligence prostitution.
LGBTQI intimacy discussion trap
Child intelligence operatives below the age of consent are sent out to contact an LGBTQI person and they invariably ask the LGBTQI person whether s/he is female or male and whether s/he likes gals or or guys. The purpose is to provoke the LGBTQI person into speak about genitalia and sexual relations with legal minors below the age of consent. As many LGBTQI persons are offended by such questions is this a deliberate provokation and harassment indeed by police intelligence as intended to impel the person to act in a manner which can later be claimed to be inappropriate. Physical intimacy tends to be a common topic among legal minors and a neutral discussion about these issues with legal minors is certainly not a crime whatsoever. Yet, if the victim falls into the trap and mentions even the slightest about intimate anatomy and/or sexual relations will the victim become interrogated by the police in becoming accused of “being a child molester”. The purpose of this interrogation harassment is to compel the victim into becoming at least slightly self-critical so as to extract some kind “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” such as an apology, an explanation or a “promise not to do it again”. Once this is achieved is the falsely extracted “acknowledgement of wrongdoing” treated as an ostensible “confession” and the victim is usually extorted intelligence prostitution.
LGBTQI communities are favored venues for intelligence recruitment as sexually attractive persons with active LGBTQI lifestyles are considered especially suitable for intelligence recruitment. Recruitment is often nominally “voluntary” although the recruited person does not realize that s/he has unwittingly “agreed” to become enslaved for unpaid covert missions of murder, prostitution, fraud and theft for the rest of the victim’s life. LGBTQI persons with promiscuous lifestyles are especially vulnerable to intelligence recruitment whether coercive intelligence recruitment through extortion (usually by the police) or nominally “voluntary” recruitment. Nominally “voluntary” recruitment is typically performed by sex partners such as girlsfriends, boyfriends etc.
The victim is exposed to experiences as deliberately intended and designed to make the victim feel helpless and lonely. This is intended to make the victim feel desperate and so propel the victim into doing something either inappropriate or semi-inappropriate in socio-sexual terms, such as illegally hiring the services of a sex worker. Even if the victim has committed no crime whatsoever can the police nevertheless deliberately falsely claim that a crime has been committed and extract some kind of implicit acknowledgement of wrongdoing so as extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
A love agent is an intelligence operative as tasked with triggering romantic infatuation in a victim and that is now largely performed by means of social media such as facebook messaging, mobile text messaging and dating websites but also IRL. A victim is lured into believing that there is a romantic relationship when in fact the purpose is either to “voluntarily recruit” the victim into intelligence prostitution as part of a purportedly romantic relationship or else lure the victim into engaging in courtship and especially so via Internet. After the victim has been recruited as part of a “relationship” does the love agent at some point suddenly disappear or just breaks up the “the relationship”. If the victim is manipulated into courtship can the police accuse the victim of stalking the love agent and that way sexually extort the victim into intelligence recruitment by means of mock threats of mock prosecution.
The victim is lured into a purported relationship of “love” in order for the undercover “love” agent (actually a seduction agent from the intelligence community) to use the relationship to extract a false confession from the victim. If this does not work may the “relationship” later become exploited by the police in formal interrogation for the purpose of sexual extortion into intelligence prostitution.
A marriage agent is sent to marry a victim. A marriage agent is typically sent to marry a VIP victim in order to influence the VIP victim. Such a marriage may be lifelong if deemed useful for and by the intelligence agency or may end after some time after the wedding and typically so after the victim has been fully voluntarily recruited by the intelligence service such as become a spy. A marriage agent may ask the victim to marry her/him or may use elaborate romantic techniques (holding off sex by claiming to be a virgin and other romantic stalling tactics) to extract a marriage proposal. A romantic marriage operation may go on for months until results have been attained. A proactive seduction agent may ask for the hand of the victim and this is especially effective with lone, sexually deprived men with little to no sexual experience.
Marriage VIP trap
A usually female marriage agent is sent out to seduce and marry a usually male VIP victim. Either is the victim manipulated into courting the marriage agent for marriage or the operative role of the marriage agent is deliberately styled to seem “slutty” and sexually accessible in which case the marriage agent will ask the VIP victim to marry her. A marriage agent as tasked with becoming courted will typically claim to be a virgin and her “virginity” is surgically restored for the purpose of that operation. There are thus two types of usually female marriage agents. One is styled as a “virgin” and the other is styled as a “slut”. The purpose of the marriage trap may be simply intelligence recruitment as part of romantic infatuation after which the marriage agent disappears but the marriage agent may also be tasked with becoming pregnant with the VIP victim. Once there is a small family may the VIP victim become deliberately falsely accused of sexually molesting the infant or toddler. The marriage agent and the child suddenly disappears and the VIP victim is held in police detention on mock charges and the police will typically try negotiation techniques in order to extract some kind of statement which the police will typically try to use as a false confession. The disappearance of the marriage agent makes the charges seem even more credible to third parties. Another version is that the marriage agent leaves the VIP victim with the child which makes it even easier for the police to deploy mock charges against the VIP victim in deliberately falsely accuse the victim of illegal sexual relations. In a further version is the marriage agent accompanied by a pre-existing child, another operative mode for police intelligence to subsequently bring mock accusations against the VIP victim in order to pressure the VIP victim into consenting to intelligence recruitment. There is also the version where the marriage agent is sent out to permanently marry the VIP victim with the intention of at least influencing the VIP victim politically and with the purpose of later one way or another securing intelligence recruitment.
A maternal interrogator (whether a uniformed police officer or otherwise) treats the victim as if she were the mother of the victim and thus typically appeals to some form of “common sense” in trying to make the victim apologize, a recorded statement which is treated by the police as if it were a full confession and is used for police sexual (or other) extortion so as to lure the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim encounters a sexually easily available person who flirtatiously says that maybe s/he is “overage”? The purpose is to later drug the victim and lure the victim into sex with underage seduction agents below the age of consent and posing as grandchildren of the the “mature” seduction agent.
Mediator friend/advisor trap
The victim experiences a staged “breakup” with a seduction agent who subsequently becomes incommunicado. The romantically infatuated and emotionally confused victim cannot receive “an explanation” for “the breakup” from the incommunicado seduction agent and so seeks the advice of someone whom he believes to be either a “friend” or is a counselor, psychologist, psychotherapist, relative and the like. The victim is unaware that what he wrongly believes to be a confidential conversation is actually a taped Linda Tripp style informal interrogation with an informal interrogator who is either an undercover operative or a recruited citizen interrogator. The purpose is to extract an unfounded “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” subsequent to the staged “breakup” after which the victim is formally interrogated by the police and the taped “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” is treated as an ostensible “confession” which is used to to extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Mediator interrogator trap
The “friendly police interrogator” claims to be “objective” in pretending to be in an “intermediary position” between the victim and one or more imaginary “plaintiffs”. The “friendly police interrogator” thus claims to “objectively” seek the “the truth” in pretending to act in an “unbiased mediator role” between “subjective perspectives”. The purpose is to manipulate the victim into empathizing with the fabricated fictious “perspectives” of the imaginary “plaintiffs”. Yet the real purpose is to delude the victim into believing that there are actually “plaintiffs” with actual “complaints” against the victim. Once the victim has thus become psychologically manipulated into putting credence into completely false premises is the next task to extract an unfounded “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” such as an apology, an explanation or the like. Once this is achieved is the “acknowledgment of wrongdong” treated by the present police officers and/or intelligence operatives as if constituting a “confession”, something which is subsequently used to sexually extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Mercy sex trap
An intelligence operative claiming to be widowed or having been abandoned by a spouse/partner makes herself sexually available to the victim. The purpose is not only to seduce the victim but to introduce the victim to another intelligence operative in the role of “a teenage relative” above the age of consent who subsequently also seduces the victim. Afterwards is the victim interrogated by the police who will falsely claim that the teenager was below the age of consent and falsely threaten the victim with prosecution despite no crime having taken place whatsoever. If the teenage seduction agent does not succeed in seducing the victim may the police accuse the victim of having “sexually exploited a bereaved person” as if there was even such as statutory crime. Once the psychologically manipulated victim has apologized and expressed regret without reason or foundation of any kind is this treated as a criminal confession and the police subsequently sexually extorts the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim has been aquainted by a teenage seduction agent above the age of consent, yet prior so to the teenager reaching the age of consent. Suddenly, the victim encounters the teenager with “her mother” in public space. The victim says hello and starts up a conversation with both intelligence operatives. The mother is friendly but initially slightly reserved but flirtatiously starts interrogating the victim about the victim’s age and relationship with the teenager. The victim now also befriends the mother whom invites invites the victim to “their home”. The victim later has sex with “both mother and daughter” who shockingly also have sex with each other. The mother flirtatiously asks about every detail about how the victim and “the daughter” met each other while the daughter was still below the age of consent. The purpose of this informal interrogation is to to build a case against the victim and lure the victim into admitting a sexual wrongdoing of some kind with a person below the age of consent. Later is the victim arrrested by the police and at least accused of being “an accomplice to incest” and also of further sexual misdemeanors if questions of “the mother” have resulted in the victim admitting any kind of sexual intention one way or another. Despite the fact that the victim has committed no crime is the victim nevertheless deceived by the police into believing that the victim has somehow become a sex criminal and henceforth has a choice between “becoming a police agent” or “face prosecution” for actual non-crimes.
The person is lured into a relationship with a usually female seduction agent from the intelligence community and subsequently also lured into having sexual relations with both the mother and “her child”, actually an underage seduction agent below the age of consent from the intelligence community. This is subsequently used by the police for extortion purposes in order to force the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Military court abduction
The victim is lured into group sex and is later abducted by plainclothes undercover agents who bring her to a secret military court. The court falsely tells her that she has illegally had sex with a teenager below the age consent as part of the group sex. She is told that the intelligence service is very impressed by the victim and decided to save her and that she would have been arrested by the police had she not been saved in the last minute by “military intelligence”. She is offered a new career path in the intelligence sector and immunity from prosecution provided that she agrees to intelligence recruitment. If she does not accept “the offer” is she led out of the court and “correctively raped” by rape agents until she “consents” to intelligence recruitment and signs a form to this effect.
Military court interrogation trap
The victim is required to come to a police interrogation which instead turns out to be a secret military court. The victim is forced to participate in the hearing of the secret military court and told that the normal system of justice will not press charges for sexual non-crimes if the victim cooperates with the secret military court. Once the victim “agrees to cooperate” does the victim legally become subject to the military court as this is considered as constituting an acceptance of intelligence recruitment. The victim may be threatened with execution for “high treason” unless the victim “cooperates” with the court. The victim is thus deceived into falsely believing that she has technically and unbeknowst committed a legal infringement of a sexual nature. The victim is made to believe that the secret military court is doing her “a favor” by “saving her” from ostensible but not actual prosecution in the normal system of justice. At this point does the victim typically consents to intelligence recruitment as leading to intelligence prostitution as well.
The victim is called to a police interrogation pertaining to a sexual matter. Once there, are there also security officials present who will offer the victim “a way out”. The officials will however also accuse the victim of a misdemeanor pertaining to association with members of an organization or movement legally designated as “terrorist” whether or not that is an accurate designation or not. The victim is deliberately confused into consenting to intelligence recruitment through this peculiarly combined sexual interrogation and “terrorist” interrogation.
A uniformed police officer or an informal interrogator asks questions as deliberately intended to lead to an intentional misunderstanding which the police subsequently claims is a legal confession. The recorded conversation is used by the police to extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is subjected to an operational experience (e.g. staged rejection in dating) which without basis leads her to presume that she somehow did something wrong as the operational purpose is indeed to psychologically manipulate the victim into questioning herself and without foundation make her think that she just maybe did something wrong. The purpose is to manipulate the conscientious and emphathetic victim into expressing regret in some way or another, such as to a trusted friend in a police-taped conversation. Once this has been attained may the police engage in formal mock interrogation against the victim with the purpose of making the victim “admit” a non-crime. However, the subsequently extracted “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” is instead disingenuously used by the police to claim that the victim has committed and confessed a statutory crime. The victim is subsequently threatened with prosecution (the police have no powers of prosecution!) unless the victim has sex with the sexually highly attractive police interrogator and after the sex commences in the police interrogation room is the victim gangraped by intelligence rape agents in police uniform and the victim is subsequently coerced into commercial prostitution as soon leading to intelligence prostitution. If the victim however somehow manages to avoid/elude/escape commercial prostitution and files an official police complaint for having been raped by the police is the victim instead delibetely falsely accused of sexually harassing/assaulting a police officer and the victim is threaetned with “police prosecution” unless the victim formally signs onto intelligence recruitment.
Life is subjective and full of potential misunderstandings. The police will typically try to extract “an acknowledgment of misunderstanding” as this tends to lead polite victims into politely apologizing so as to somehow psychologically “reconcile” with the interrogating police officer. Non-verbal sexual consent such as in the absence of a shared language may also be used by an interrogating police officer for manipulatively deceiving the victim into believing that “there has been a misunderstanding” and that she has somehow done “something wrong” and subsequently extract a false confession from her. A civic or plainclothes interrogator in a position of epistemological authority (e.g. a manager or a psychologist) may also use her/his position to make the victim believe that “there has been a misunderstanding” so as to manipulate the victim into “acknowledging wrongdoing” and “promising not to do it again”. The victim is subsquently subjected to official police interrogation where the reconciliatory utterances of the victim in relation to the person in authority is treated as if constituting “a criminal confession”, something which is subsequently used to sexually and/or otherwise extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is interrogated by the police or by an agent of the police for the purpose of extracting a confession for a different crime than the one the victim assumes. False premises are typically claimed as part of a mock interrogation as “suspecting a crime” without of course there being any such suspicion whatseover as well as claiming that there are plaintiffs when in fact there are no plaintiffs at all. The purpose is in any case to extract some kind of utterance on the part of the victim which the police can claim to constitute or “indicate” guilt such as lying/denying/blaming. Once the victim is caught stating something untrue and/or contradictory or having made some kind of reconciliatory “acknowledgement of wrongdoing” such as a polite apology (e.g. “I meant not to insult”) and/or “promise to not do it again” is this deployed by police interrogators so as to claim that that the victim has somehow acknowledged “guilt” and this is subsequently used to to sexually and/or otherwise extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Police sexual harassment and police intelligence coercive recruitment operations are usually justified by means of a mock investigation as based on mock suspicisons. Usually is the victim deliberately falsely labeled as “a suspect sex criminal” which is especially effective against LGBTQI victims who tend to give in to police threats of faux prosecution. There are two main reasons for this, both due to fears of being exposed as LGBTQI (such as the female spouse of the victim finding out that her husband is actively bisexual) and because LGBTQI people tend to wrongly assume that the courts are just as hostile and anti-LGBTQI as the police itself.
Since prosecutors are “protectively recruited” by police intelligence can police intelligence order a protectively recruited prosecutor to engage in mock prosecution. This is usually not illegal since whether to initiate prosecution is not an exact science. However, prosecutors are not supposed to do this in a way that causes public scandal. LGBTQI victims are particularly targeted targeted for legal harassment of mock prosecution with typically mock sex charges. The prosecutor has no case yet still mounts a prosecution in bad faith with the purpose of police intelligence extorting the victim into “agreeing to” coercive intelligence recruitment. Mock prosecution is normally mounted by means of the police withholding evidence proving innocence with the purpose of that way making the victim “seem guilty”. This is especially effective with mock sex charges and with LGBTQI victims as they typically fear not being believed by heterocultural members of the court. In countering this is it essential to figure out what evidence proving innocence that the police deliberately and illegally withholds and then for the defense attorney to demand access to documentation from police surveillance operations against the victim.
It is not really illegal for the police to purposely falsely “suspect” someone in order to justify police harassment against that person. Mock suspicions are typically recorded in the national police surveillance data base and subsequently used justify further harassment in the form of continued mock investigation and serial mock interrogations. Pretending to suspect a victim of being a sex criminal is the most effective method, something which is strengthened by accumulated mock suspicions. Pretending to suspect the victim of violence and especially agains legal minors (such as teenage boys baiting the victim into near physical conflict) is also a popular mock suspicion although any legal excuse may be deployed including as involving the tax authority. After some time of police harassment does the victim typically start to question herself in subsquently potentially losing faith in the justness of her own conduct, something which very much facilitates police extortion so as to sexually exploit the victim and drag her into intelligence prostitution.
Mock trial operations
Mock trials are a particularly effective form of police intelligence coercive recruitment. This means that the victim receives seemingly formal-looking letters of being called to a police interrogation, meeting with an intelligence operative claiming to be a defense attorney at an official lawyer’s officer and of course receiving date of trial. The purpose of the police intelligence mock trial process is simply one long extended undercover interrogation, namely the purpose is to compel the victim to speak out in defense of herself which of course is one of the main purposes of police interrogation. Police intelligence is ready to insincerely describe almost any recorded utterance on the part of the victim as an ostensible “confession” and will use that to extort the victim into intelligence recuitment as leading to intelligence prostitution. The “defense attorney” till tell the victim that she ostensibly “stands no chance at the trial” and will refuse to accede to requests of legally assisting the victim; all done in order to compel the victim into “accepting” coercive intelligence recruitment as leading to intelligence prostitution as well. If the victim stands by her innocence is she however automatically acquitted at the mock trial. The purpose is to compel the victim into “making a deal” which will involve “cooperation with the police”, namely coercive police intelligence recruitment as leading to intelligence prostitution. A mock trial may also be a cover for bringing the unwitting victim to a formal proceeding of a secret military court which is particularly dangerous considering that secret military courts usually convict persons to secret execution. An official invitation to a mock trial may thus simply be attempted abduction and subsequent intended murder against the victim on the part of the thoroughly corrupt and criminal police intelligence.
Moral crime interrogation
The victim is subjected to a formal/informal interrogation by someone and is accused of doing something clearly not illegal, yet the victim is treated as if she has committed a crime despite being accused of doing something perfectly legal. This is an effective form of intelligence recruitment fraud because most victims will be deceived into believing that the performed act is illegal despite being perfectly legal. The purpose is to produce a taped unwarranted “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” which the police may subsequently treat as a “confession” for the purpose of sexually and/or otherwise extorting the victim into intelligence prostitution. A common procedure as used against LGBTQI victims is to manipulate the victim into actually believing that her perfectly law-abiding overtly LGBTQI lifestyle is somehow ostensibly “criminal”.
Municipal employees as recruited by the police are tasked by the police to engage in “extra scrutiny” towards the victim as part of the police harassment campaign against the victim.
Most citizens although typically holding a romantic view of the nature of lives of intelligence operatives are unaware of most intelligence methods and so easily fall into intelligence traps. Even persons who are aware of the concept of “honey trapping” will typically fall for honey traps. Intelligence entrapment takes advantage of ignorance, sexual deprivation and lack of intelligence training. However, even trained intelligence operatives may fall into a honeytraps. A common misconception is that police honey trapping only involves baiting as it may also involve actual sexual relations, including with underage intelligence seduction agents below the age of consent.
Naive sex trap
The victim encounters a seduction agent of any age above the age of consent who seems extremely naive and also is easily sexually available. The victim has sexual relations with the seduction agent and later does the police appear and accuse the victim of sexually taking advantage of a person with what is known as intellectual disability (“mental retardation”), i.e. a person with much lower IQ than the average in the person’s genetic group. Despite nothing illegal having taken place is the interrogation nevertheless intended to induce a sense of guilt. The police tells the victim to expect to be prosecuted unless the victim “cooperates” with the police. The victim is falsely given the choice between facing prosecution (for having confessed a non-crime!) or become a paid police agent. The victim obviously finds the latter choice more comfortable and the victim does not realize that s/he has legally speaking “consented” to intelligence recruitment into intelligence prostitution.
Needy prostitute trap
The victim meets one or more prostitutes in need of rescue. The compassionate victim opens her/his home to the poor victims. The victim is seduced by the intelligence prostitute(s) after which a pimp turns up and demands payment. Either does the victim pay the pimp in which case the person will become arrested, interrogated and extorted by the police or else will the person become raped by the pimp with the victim in either case being forced into intelligence prostitution.
Negging is both an abusive technique for making someone more easily sexually accessible and an abusive interrogation technique. In both cases is negging about inducing the artificial lowering of the victim’s self-esteem so as to make the victim more vulnerable whether for sexual entrapment or abusive interrogation and in both cases as intended to undermine the victim’s belief in her own good judgment in provoking her to specifically not act out of good judgment. Thus compelling the victim to question herself typically makes her more vulnerable to both sexual entrapment and abusive police interrogation with subsequent police sexual extortion as intended to lure the victim into intelligence prostitution. Operational negging deliberately deploys structural prejudice (e.g. sexism, transphobia, racism, xenophobia, ageism, ableism etc.) which makes the negging seem random and casual but other forms of negging may be deployed as well and especially so deliberately deployed fallacies (e.g. straw man fallacy) and in the process insulting the victim in hoping to provoke the victim into somehow “crossing the line” into unintended words or other spontaneous behaviors which in turn may be used against the victim by the police and ultimately so for police extortion for the purpose of coercive intelligence recruitment.
The victim suffers recurring noise pollution and/or some degree of perceived harassment from a neighbor. The victim contacts the neighbor and is invited into the neighbor’s home where the victim is seduced by the neighbor and the neighbor’s partner with the intention of later introducing the victim to sex with the neighbor’s children or grandchildren below the age of consent. Everyone involved is tasked by police intelligence into seducing the victim for entrapment purposes. Once this is attained is the victim sexually extorted into intelligence prostitution by the police.
Nightclub hooker trap
The victim is induced into dance with a female seduction agent at a nightclub. Another seduction posing as a pimp appears and tells the victim to stay away from her. The purpose is compel the drunk victim to pay the pimp for sexual servicess with the female seduction agent and thus commit a crime for which the victim can be interrogated and sexually extorted by the police into intelligence prostitution.
No ID trap
The victim meets an enticing teenager whose stated age is above the consent and who is intimately interested in the victim. The victim asks for ID but the teenage entrapment agent claims to have no ID on her that day and the victim reasons that she will have sex anyway. Later is the victim arrested and interrogated and accused of sex with a teenager below the age of consent and sexually extorted into intelligence prostitution.
“Non-police” formal interrogation
The victim is formally interrogated by a decoy intelligence operative at the police station who presents herself as “a psychologist”, “a social worker”, “a counselor” or simply “a non-police employee of the police”. The decoy agent is tasked with making herself available for seduction by the victim. The decoy agent will present herself as a naive and well-meaning “type” of sexually attractive woman so as to produce sexual arousal in the victim and thus dull the judgment of the victim. The purpose of this is first and foremost to induce the victim to want to “help” the purportedly “inept” interrogator in her job. Second is the purpose to make the victim want to “confide” in the decoy agent. Third is the purpose to produce some kind of induced and politely intended yet unwarranted “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” which the police can treat as an indirect confession so as to extort the victim into intelligence prostitution. Fourth is the purpose for the decoy to become intimate with the victim whether for casual sex or a relationship. The purpose of this to for the victim to confide as part of a relationship or else the police accusing the victim of behaving inappropriately towards the decoy agent. Either way is it used by the police to extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Online dating interrogation trap
The victim dates a seduction agent online. At some point does the character of purported “friendship” transform into online interrogation. The purpose is to extract some sort of confession (false or real) for a crime or non-crime which can subsequently be used by the police to extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Online discussion trap
The victim is harassed online such as in a Facebook group and the purpose is to extract what can then be construed as confession for an actual or imaginary misdemeanor by the victim, something which in turn is deployed for the purpose of police sexual extortion against the victim.
Online Infatuation Trap
The victim is enticed into an online relationsship with a seduction agent with the purpose of making the victim fall in love with this online persona and subsequently provoke the victim to stalk the assumed identity of the seduction agent both online and IRL. This is used to force a confession and subsequently sexually extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Online MILF trap
The victim meets “a single parent” online who is actually a seduction agent claiming to have fallen in love with the victim. Once united IRL does the seduction agent drug the victim and subsequently lures the victim into sex with underage seduction agents below the age of consent posing as “her children”. The victim is later confronted by police and sexually extorted into intelligence prostitution.
Online persona maturity trap
The victim encounters an adult persona online. The online persona deliberately seems quite naive and ignorant and may deliberately also seem immature as a person. The purpose is to entice the victim into becoming intimate with the online persona and if this succeeds is the victim subsequently interrogated by the police who claims that there was “a child below the age of consent behind the online persona” and that the victim “ought to have understood this”. Yet, this is in fact not true as there was an adult police officer or adult intelligence operative behind the account. The victim is thus accused of being a sex criminal and deceived into believing that she inadvertently did something wrong and the purpose is to produce an “acknowledgement of wrongdoing” such as an apology, an excuse, an explanation, partial blaming or a “promise not to do it again” which in turn can be claimed to constitute a “confession” for the purpose of extorting the victim into intelligence prostitution
Online prostitution trap
The victim is lured to communicate through social media such as Facebook with what he thinks is a prostitute but is actually an undercover police agent. Although no explicit promise of exchange of money takes place is the recorded conversation sufficient for the police to interrogate the victim and a police officer posing as a pimp will furthermore extort the victim for money “for the time spent” chatting with the prostitute. Once the victim has paid can the police extort the victim for purportedly having purchased future sexual services. This in turn opens up for police sexual extortion as leading to involuntary recruitment into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is involuntarily subjected to a mock interrogation in public space or in her home by a uniformed police officer with the purpose of extracting a false confession. This is particularly deployed against LGBTQI victims.
Intelligence agencies are effectively above the law for nearly all legal purposes, yet detest public exposure. This means that intelligence agencies abide by the principle of plausible deniability in designing operations but do not shy away from breaking the law as long as not risking public exposure. Since intelligence operatives usually have day jobs and civilians careers are intelligence agencies particularly anxious not to act in ways that could indirectly expose their intelligence operatives under their public identities. Local exposure may be prevented by recruiting local journalists but a victim may spread the information in ways both online and IRL which can leave a trail that is difficult to disguise and also highly inconvenient in terms of an exposed intelligence operative.
The police is legally permitted to engage in covert operations and police intelligence may do so in collaboration with other branches of the national intelligence community and these operations may also include the participation of allied foreign intelligence agencies. There is no independent oversight, transparency or scrutiny which means that committing crimes is normal procedure during covert operations as long as not risking detection and exposure. Due to the fact that it is legal to carry out intelligence operations and that there is also no risk of prosecution for crimes committed as part of operational routine is harassment and especially sexual harassment the norm during coercive intelligence recruitment operations. One purpose is to inspire a victim into committing illegal acts which may subsequently be used by the police for extorting the victim into intelligence prostitution. One reason for this is that becoming an intelligence operative means learning the skills of murder, prostitution, fraud and theft as considered necessary for surviving in hostile operational environments abroad.
The victim is placed in situation of sexual opportunity. It is tempting also because it feels both easy and safe and that is also how the encounter is designed to be. The purpose is to entice the person to engage in inappropriate socio-sexual behavior for which the victim can later become sexually extorted by the police into intelligence recruitment and therefore also coerced into intelligence prostitution. The victim is typically alone with a seduction agent and that is intended to manipulate and compel the victim into behaviors that the victim would probably not otherwise engage in.
The victim is provoked into panic with the purpose of deluding the victim into believing that she needs to confess something to the police that she did not actually commit in order so as to receive “lenient treatment by the court”. The police tells her that she will not be prosecuted if she goes along with police demands and signs a false confession. Once the police has manipulatively extracted som kind of false acknowledgement of “wrongdoing” can the police credibly sexually extort the victim into “recruitment” leading to intelligence prostitution.
Parental gender imitation operations
Intelligence operatives as sent out to ensnare a victim for coercive intelligence recruitment are commonly instructed to imitate an individual gender of a parent of the victim and if documented or otherwise known when the victim was a child. This is done for purposes of seduction, interrogation (whether informal or formal), entrapment (sexual or otherwise) as leading to coercive intelligence recruitment into intelligence prostitution. Intelligence operational methods are largely based on highly cynical interpretations of psychoanalysis in applying and conducting a sort of psychoanalytic, semiotic intelligence warfare, including for the purpose of entrapment operations as leading to coercive intelligence recruitment. The operative assumption generally is thus that many victims will tend to be sexually attracted towards, rebel against and/or engage in ill-advised informal behavior towards persons whose respective gender resembles the gender of a parent of the victim when the victim was a child. The underlying idea is that by exposing the victim to parental-style gendered behavior (including parental-style attempts at persuasion aimed at deluding the victim into believing that she has done something wrong and thus extract a taped, yet unfounded “acknowledgment of wrongdoing”) will thus commence to make herself amenable to intelligence extortion by means of informal and certainly ill-advised private speech/writing, certainly ill-advised private social conduct and certainly ill-advised private sexual behavior whether in public, private or semi-private social arenas. Since parents tend to be highly influential is the idea to appropriate and wield this informal power in manipulating the victim to speak/write and behave in a manner that may subsequently be used against the victim for purposes of extortion into intelligence prostitution.
Parents with non-adult children are typically highly vulnerable to police intelligence sexually extorting them into submitting to coercive intelligence recruitment. All the police needs to do is to deliberately falsely accuse a parent of sexual abusing a legal minor who is her offspring. Especially mothers become desperately fearful of losing custody of children and so are easily coerced into intelligence prostitution in tragically of course not understanding that their children will inevitably become sexually exploited as enslaved seduction agents as well.
The victim’s child, grandchild or other close young person is recruited into becoming an informal police interrogator against the victim. The child-adult informal interrogation is however taped by the police and once there is something that could form the basis of police sexual extortion is the victim arrested and forced into intelligence prostitution.
A person has been rightly or wrongly convicted of a a serious crime such as murder and is serving a multi-year prison sentence. The person temporarily leaves prison on parole and is subsequently enticed into illegal sex with youth. Back in prison is the convict called to a meeting with his parole officer who falsely claims that the youth in question was actually below the age of consent. If the victim did not ask the youth for ID will the false charge probably seem quite plausible. The convict is offered release from prison provided that he agrees to become an intelligence operative. The victim is unaware that he is being illegally extorted and sees this as an opportunity for release from prison and thus accepts intelligence recruitment. He is unaware that convicts who have committed severe crimes such as murder and serial rape are considered attractive intelligence recruits such as for becoming professional assassins and rape agents. He is also unaware that he will become an intelligence prostitute as well as are indeed virtually all intelligence operatives.
The victim is treated as if the victim were the child of the formal/informal interrogator and the “paternal” interrogator will deploy some form of masculinity to infer ethnonormativity in implying that the victim is in violation of social norms. The purpose is to extract a recorded apology which is treated as a confession of criminal wrongdoing and which subsequently can be used for police sexual extortion for the purpose of luring the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Persuasion operations are designed to persuade the victim into acting, believing and/or speaking in an ill-advised manner which may subsequently become exploited for the purpose of coercive intelligence recruitment one way or another. “Persuasion” may become operationally designed to manipulate the victim into “acknowledge wrongdoing” without the victim having done anything wrong or illegal and as specifically intended so as to manipulate the victim into “desiring to please the persuader” such as by offering an “apology”, “explantion” or “consolation” to the persuader; something which will become deployed by the police so as to extort the victim into coercive intelligence recruitment. Persuasion operations are also performed in otherwise persuading the victim to act in a manner which makes the victim more vulnerable to coercive intelligence recruitment such as agreeing to sexual relations with what turns out to be a rape agent who subsequently coerces the victim into commercial prostitution and later intelligence prostitution. Persuader agents may also otherwise offer bad advice such as encouraging the victim to take irresponsible sexual risks, become a sex worker, venture to unsafe areas at night, break the law, use alcohol and other recreational drugs as well as travelling to a dictatorship where coercive intelligence recruitment may completely ignore legal safeguards as still existing in liberal democracies.
The victim is conversationally stigmatized as sexually “different”. The victim feels psychological pressure and may believe the deliberate stigmatization and is provoked into confiding in someone as psychological outlet and subsequently the police uses the recorded conversation in order so as to extort the person into intelligence prostitution.
The person is physically abused (e.g. roughed up or violently arrested for no legal reason whatsoever) for the purpose of making the victim more vulnerable to manipulative interrogation techniques. The victim is typically subsequently greeted by a seemingly friendly “good cop” (typically a physically attractive woman) who engages in covert interrogation under the guise of charming persuasion.
Pickup bootcamp trap
The victim is enticed into public pickup by signing up for pickup “bootcamp training” which is a common facade for identifying and subsequently training elite proactive seduction agents at their own expence. Famous pickup artists have popular youtube channels and so during pickup bootcamp are participants familiarized with many particular pickup techniques. However, once the victim starts to practice pickup on his own may he be arrested for either doing pickup too intensely and for too long in one venue and therefore becoming accused of disturbing public order or he will become accused of crossing the line in his efforts to seduce fellow persons. He will become formally/informally interrogated with the purpose of extracting some kind of apology, explanation or confession, even for a non-crime as intended to be used for sexually extorting him into intelligence prostitution. Pickup artists never teach legal dimensions of pickup as it easy to do something which may be misconstrued as illegal considering the inherently sexist nature of the heterocultural pickup scene. It is convenient that this is not taught as this facilitates subsequent police sexual extortion and more or less coercive recruitment into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is a lured into purchasing commercial sexual services from an intelligence operative posing as an ordinary prostitute in subsequently enabling an intelligence operative posing as a pimp to threaten and extort the person for money. If the victim does not pay is the attractive-looking victim forced into commercial prostitution. If the victim pays is the victim later arrested by the police and accused of illegally paying a prostitute. The victim is pressured to confess and the confession is in turn used to sexually extort the victim into intelligenc prostitution.
The victim is lured into doing something that is distinctly not in his own interest and he does so precisely out of pity for someone else. E.g. may a teenage decoy agent first beg the victim for money and later ask/beg/convince the victim to have sex as well. Later is the victim accused by the police of soliciting and paying a prostitute for commercial sexual services and the victim is subsequently sexually extorted into intelligence prostitution. Pity operations may also involve luring the victim into a situation where the victim will feel pity for an agent (e.g. an agent pretending to be lying ill the street) and so will be lured into a social scenario which the victim certainly did not expect such as getting into bad company, e.g. getting a “girlfriend” who plays the role of a prostitute on heroin or a getting a “boyfriend” playing the role of a pimp on heroin. A “nice” decoy police intelligence interrogator may also emotionally appeal to the victim’s sense of pity in asking the victim “to help” the interrogator with “the failed interrogation”.
The victim is befriended and seduced by “a player” (a confident and experienced seducer) who is actually a proactive seduction agent. The victim falls in love with “the player” and she agrees to travel to another country where she is persuaded to agree to intelligence recruitment after which she undergoes rape training to prepare her for becoming an intelligence prostitute.
Police agreeement trap
The victim is subjected to police mock interrogation for a non-crime. The victim is invited to “make an agreement with the police” which implies confession for “having done something wrong”. This is subsequently used by the police to extract a confession for a crime or non-crime. If the police fails to extract an explicit or implicit confession for a crime or non-crime can the police at later date claim that a victim has “broken the agreement” and “therefore has a choice” of either “cooperating” (i.e. “consenting” to intelligence recruitment) or face prosecution for “breaking the agreement with the police”. This of course has no legal basis whatsoever, yet a victim can be taken advantage of by the police (through sexual exploitation and coerced recruitment) by deceiving the victim into believing that the police have extra-judicial powers to limit someone’s freedom of action under law through “an agreement with the police”.
The victim is deliberately provoked by intelligence operatives into doing something either illegal or borderline illegal. Despite the victim being sober is the victim placed in a cell for drunkards where the victim is violently raped by rape agents until the victim “consents” to becoming “a police agent”, meaning intelligence recruitment.
Police beating anti-LGBTQI trap
The LGBTQI victim is apprehended by security guards on instructions from the police for living openly LGBTQI on the excuse of purportedly “disturbing public order” and the victim is subsequently released after the manipulative police interrogation failed to extract anything that could be claimed to constitute a confession. The security guards were instructed by the police to use excessive force so that the victim will experience residual pain for months after the incident. While the police has no grounds for any legal action against the victim after the victim has been released from the brief detention is the hope that the victim will file a complaint for police-instigated violence due to the deliberately inflicted residual pain. Once the victim files an official police complaint for excessive force is the LGBTQI victim accused of the incident for which the victim was apprehended without cause and suddenly does the police find a legal excuse for legal harassment against the LGBTQI victim. The official complaint by the LGBTQI victim means that the police commences a mock investigation in interrogating the LGBTQI victim in seeking to persuade the victim to “acknowledge wrongdoing” for living openly LGBTQI despite this being perfectly legal. Once this is secured does the police claim to have “a confession” and the victim is sexually extorted into intelligence prostitution. If however this does not work is the victim “correctively raped” by a rape agent at the police station for daring to file a complaint against the police as an LGBTQI victim of police-instigated crime and the LGBTQI victim is subsequently physically coerced into commercial prostitution by the rape agent as leading to intelligence prostitution. If the LGBTQI victim nevertheless succeeds to elude becoming coercively commercially prostituted and files a complaint for the police rape is the victim turned over to psychiatry for “making the absurd claim” of having been raped during a police interrogation. Once in psychatry is the victim subjected to informal interrogation so as to secure a false confession. The police will try various legal means to declare the LGBTQI victim incapable, dangerous, a potential sex offender, criminally insane, a threat to public safety, sexually deviant and so on and so forth and pressures psychiatry to subject the LGBTQI victim to anti-LGBTQI sexual harassment in the hope that the LGBTQI victim is provoked into once more filing a police complaint, this time against psychiatry. If the LGBTQI victim does file an official police complaint against psychiatry will the police-recuited offender immediately falsely accuse the LGBTQI victim of having confessed a sex crime for which mock interrogation once more commences.
A “friendly” police officer makes herself available for “friendship” with the victim of some sort such as for dating; the purpose of which is anyhow informal interrogation, sexual entrapment, sexual extortion and ultimately involuntary recruitment into intelligence prostitution.
Police “prosecution” deadline anti-LGBTQI trap
The LGBTQI victim has successfully survived an anti-LGBTQI mock interrogation at a police station as intended to extract an unfounded “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” and the victim is accused of being “criminal” for living openly LGBTQI despite this being fully legal. Later is the LGBTQI victim contacted by the police and illegally asked to review copies of an ostensible “police investigation” by accepting a registered delivery that actually contains a substantial amount of heroin as planted and sent by the police. The LGBTQI victim is also asked to accept a delivery of “video tapes” (as if anyone uses video tapes nowadays!) of a non-existent interrogation with non-existent plaintiffs and the registered delivery actually contains child pornography as planted there and sent by the police. If the victim avoids those traps is the LGBTQI victim illegally told that “there is a deadline for being able to review” the non-existent “investigation” and “watch the videos” so as to lure the victim to accept the illegal deliveries and subsequently arrest the victim upon accepting the illegal deliveries at the local post office. The victim is told that the ostensible “investigation” will be “handed over” to the prosecutor’s office after the ostensible “deadline”. The purpose is deceive the victim into wrongly believing that the courts are as anti-LGBTQI as are the police in thus pressuring the LGBTQI victim into falsely believing that she “will be understood by the police” if she agrees to sign a false confession. There is however no basis for prosecuting the fully innocent LGBTQI victim and the police simply endeavors to psychologically manipulate the LGBTQI victim into signing onto “recruitment as an agent of the police”, meaning intelligence prostitution “in return for the police forgiving” the fully innocent LGBTQI victim.
The victim encounters an attractive and charming police officer whom the victim is made to believe is sexually/romantically interested in the victim. The victim has sexual relations with the police officer who is actually an undercover intelligence seduction agent and the mission of this “police officer” is to fabricate consent to intelligence recruitment by any and all means. If none of this succeeds may the police falsely accuse the victim of sexual misdemanor against a police officer and thus sexually extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Police sexual abuse
The police sexually abuses the victim in order to “soften up” the person for subsequent police interrogation as intended to extort and coerce the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Police sexual exploitation
The victim is threatened and extorted into providing sexual services to the police and is subsequently coerced into intelligence prostitution.
The victims is operatationally deliberately drawn into something essentially political such as discussing feminism, gender bender, sexual politics, guerrilla insurgency, social activism and other topics of socially transformative politics. The police will subsequently use this to accuse the victim of being “a terrorist”, “sexually deviant”, “engaging in intentionally offensive public activism” etc. While the victim committed no crime are these excuses for the police to pretend to “suspect” the victim, sexually harass the victim as well as as harass the victim with deliberately unfounded accusations in order to extract some kind of statement that could be falsely claimed to constitute a “confession” in order for the police to sexually and/or otherwise extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is subjected to some kind formal/informal interrogation subsequent to a date or similar social encounter in order to extract a false confession for a statutory crime which did not happen. The intelligence interrogator may pose as a father, a brother; or a professional such as a police officer, a security guard, a pimp or an owner/manager of a supermarket.
The formal/informal interrogator claims that there are grievances against the victim. A lesbian female may be told as part of anti-LGBTQI police-organized sexual harassment that heterocultural females simply do not wish to be in contact with her and that she by being overtly lesbian makes them “uncomfortable”, implying that normal lesbian social behavior constitutes sexual harassment against “heterosexual females” as a collective. Other such intentionally and deliberately false premises may be posed and the purpose is to somehow make the victim somehow implicitly accept the false premise. This is a type ofs deliberate police sexual harassment as intended to provoke the victim into aggressive outbursts, lying/denying/blaming etc. However, once the victim has been manipulated into discursively accepting the false premise is the next stage to force some sort of explanation or apology which together with acceptance of the premise can be construed as a “confession” of “wrongdoing”. Once the victim has thus been linguistically manipulated is the next phase police sexual extortion as leading to involuntary recruitment into intelligence prostitution.
Sexual harassment is deliberately operationally performed by intelligence operatives against the victim in order so as to emotionally reduce the good judgment of the victim and subsequently provoke the victim into doing something for which the victim subsequently can become extorted by the police into intelligence prostitution.
Proactive seduction agent
A proactive seduction agent will typically actively initiate seduction (e.g. mouth kissing) in public space while a decoy agent will not initiate seduction in public space but may do so in private space.
Projective accusation (“blame the victim”)
Uniformed police officers, undercover police officers and/or agents of the police commit crimes of a sexual and harassing nature against the victim during which the agents committing those crimes accuse the victim of committing precisely such a crime. E.g. may the police sexually assualt the victim while falsely accusing the victim of sexually assualting others.
Projective responsibility trap
Police intelligence will typically commit a crime against a victim in order to provoke the victim into filing a complaint for a statutory crime after which the police will deliberately falsely accuse the victim of committing a violation of very same statutory crime in order so as to secure a false confession that can be deployed to extort the victim into intelligence prostitution. While this is blantantly criminal and unfair is the police a thoroughly corrupt and criminal institution indeed. A victim of attempted police intelligence coercive recruitment should thus avoid filing any criminal complaint against anyone whomsoever unless absolutely required by law or as intended as a carefully calibrated counter-entrapment operation in order to provoke mock prosecution and thus allow a defense attorney to order a copy of the recorded audial (and sometimes audiovisual) police documentation of the event.
The victim is persuaded to promise “never to do something again” despite the victim never having done such a thing. The victim is made to believe that s/he has been “forgiven” by the police when in fact the police has instead extracted a false confession which can subsequently be used to coerce the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is manipulated into believing that “the police can press charges” against the victim when in fact the opposite is true as the false threat of prosecution is a means of police sexual extortion against the victim. The victim confirms “circumstances” which the police disingenously claim somehow constitute criminal confession. This “confession” of a non-crime is subsequently used to extort the victim into consenting into recruitment into becoming a police agent, something which later turns out to be intelligence prostitution.
Written communication from the prosecutor’s office is used scare the victim into falsely believing that the police has a case against the victim when in fact it is all about coercing false confessions so as to extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is subjected to a criminal violations as committed by intelligence operatives against the victim. The victim files a police complaint and receives a letter from the prosecutor’s office where instead the victim is falsely accused of committing a statutory crime. The purpose is to draw the victim into explanations, apologies and the like for the purpose of using these as purported “implicit confessions” so as to extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is subjected to a purported, yet actually intended “misunderstanding” for which the victim is provoked to subsequently politely apologize for. The police will claim that the successfully provoked apology is a criminal confession and so will use the taped apology in order to sexually extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Psychiatric anti-LGBTQI abduction
The police sends out its unofficial “partners” in psychiatry to abduct a victim on the basis of police-invented imaginary “rumors” and “complaints” by neighbors and relatives despite no such complaints having been made and no rumors having been spread. It is claimed that the victim’s gender is “sick” and that her LGBTQI lifestyle is “criminal”. This is done subsquent to police having intruded into the home of the victim to aggressively accuse the victim of sex crimes such as raping children and having failed to forcibly extract some kind of false acknowledgement of wrongdoing of some kind. The victim is brought to the psychiatrist “police partner” who insults the victim for being LGBTQI until the victim responds with anger, aggression or nervousness and in either case is the victim declared mentally ill (e.g. hypomania) and threatened with confinement in mental hospital unless she confesses to wrongdoing. Unless the victim agrees to take completely needless medication is the victim actually confined to a mental hospital where further interrogation operations of various kinds ensue. The purpose is to induce some kind of false remorse such as through interrogation drugs despite the victim having done nothing wrong. This type of operation may be carried against any designated victim but is typically performed against LGBTQI victims.
Psychiatric harassment against LGBTQI persons
The victim is harassed by psychiatric employees as recruited, tasked and trained by the police to do so and falsely accusing the victim of having a “sick” (i.e. openly LGBTQI) gender and a “criminal sexual” (i.e. openly LGBTQI) lifestyle. Psychiatric employees try to force false confessions and harass the victim into not living openly as herself. These informal interrogations are taped as intended for later use in police sexual extortion against the victim.
Psychiatry is frequently abused by intelligence agencies in order to punish disobedient intelligence operatives as well as so as to discredit potential or actual whistleblowers. An intelligence agency may voluntarily/coercively recruit employees of any government agency and psychiatry unfortunately is no exception. Psychiatry is so effective precisely as it is such an effective means of discrediting a whistleblower and force the whistleblower into obedience and submission. This is one of many types of horrendous abuses as unfortunately common in the intelligence world. Psychiatric repression was pioneered by the Gestapo in Nazi Germany and further developed by its East German Stasi successor but is unfortunately widely used by intelligence agencies in all countries as a purportedly “humanitarian” alternative to execution. Psychiatry is also prominently used as a tool for coercive intelligence recruitment including psychiatric staff sexually exploiting a victim and subsequently sexually extorting a victim into commercial prostitution as leading to intelligence prostitution. A psychiatric employee in a role as an agent may typically engage in informal interrogation and manipulatively extract a false confession from a patient and then use that to force the victim into having sex with the agent as intended to further sexually exploit the victim and subsequently force the victim into commercial prostitution as leading to intelligence prostitution.
Psychiatric provocation trap
The victim is provoked by intelligence operatives into committing deeds that will make the victim seem mentally unstable. The victim is first interrogated for “confession” of wrongdoing subsequently extorted by the police into intelligence prostitution. If the police fails to gain an acknowledgement of “wrongdoing”is the victim subsequently aggressively interrogated by a psychiatrist with the purpose of extracting a false confession for a sex crime. The psychiatric conversation is taped by the police. The victim is subsequently extorted into intelligence prostitution by means of the coerced psychiatric false confession.
The fully and perfectly sane victim is manipulatively deceived by either intelligence or the police into believing that she will become somehow wrongly and coercively victimized by psychatry such as sentenced to psychiatric incarceration unless she “fully cooperates with the police” in the shape of Ms. Good Cop. Despite having done nothing wrong is the victim pressured to provide a false confession under the false pretense that the police is somehow now “well-intentioned” and “on her side”. Once a false confession has been secured is the victim sexually extorted into intelligence prostitution. The victim may also have been manipulated into believing that “she must have been insane” and therefore was “not responsible” for her own actions, something which the victim may apologize for. This technique is especially effective against LGBTQI victims.
The victim has been made to come in regular contact with psychiatry. The victim is lured into sex with a psychiatric employe of some kind or another (who is actually an intelligence seduction agent) and who subsequently extorts the victim into commercial prostitution by making threats against the victim in psychiatric terms such as threatening the victim with psychiatric incarceration or “telling the doctor” about either a real issue or a non-issue. The commercial prostitution subsequently leads to intelligence prostitution and thus intelligence recruitment. The “psychiatric employee” is deployed for informal interrogation with the purpose of extracting some kind of “aknowledgement of wrongdoing” which is used to extort the victim in commercial prostitution as leading to intelligence prostitution.
Undercover agents subject the victim to an incomprehensible, either bizarre or traumatic experience that makes her question her own sanity. She subsequently seeks psychiatric help, where she is unsuspectingly subjected to informal interrogation as intended to extract a false confession of “wrondoing” of a sexual nature. The victim may subsequently suffer further psychiatric abuses as intended to make her cease live openly LBTQI in public space, but police sexual harassment is but a front for coercive recruitment into intelligence prostitution. Forcing the victim away from cruising in public space may make the victim frequent nightclubs instead where the victim is much more vulnerable to all kinds of abuses and sexual entrapment operations.
Psychological warfare operations
Psychological warfare is something that is commonly performed in the intelligence world as part of intelligence warfare but it may also be performed as part of coercive recruitment operations. The victim is subjected to difficult social experiences with the purposes of 1) pushing the victim off balance in provoking the victim into acting in an uncontrollable or otherwise ill-advised or unusual manner, 2) make the victim “feel sorry” and wish to confide something to “someone” and 3) “soften up” the victim for interrogation whether informal or formal as interrogation may be performed by any uniformed police officer, intelligence operative, undercover police officer or simply recruited citizen interrogator. All interrogation harassment whether formal or informal is recorded by the police in the hope that the victim will finally say something that can be used for the purpose of mock interrogation in provoking an unfounded “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” and subsequently sexually and/or otherwise extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Public kissing operations
The victim is lured or enticed into public mouth kissing with a seduction agent only shortly after meeting the seduction agent for the first time. Even a reciprocal kiss may become violently interrupted by another intelligence operative acting in the role of a brother, a father, a husband, a pimp, a security guard, a random “white knight”, a uniformed police officer or an owner/employee of a particular establishment. Depending on the role does the interruptor engage in interrogation, charge money, force the victim to “marry” the seduction agent or interrogate the victim in order to extract an explicit/implicit confession for an imaginary/real violation of law or abduct the victim with the intention of raping the victim so as to force the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Quicke judicial procedure traps
Many countries have quickie judicial procedures for minor criminal violations without needing a full court procedure. As part of a formal interrogation does the police try to persuade the victim into confessing a minor crime despite the victim of course being fully innocent. The police falsely claims that the victim faces prosecution unless the police is given what would amount to a false confession. The victim is frightened by the invented prospects of prosecution and agrees to provide a false confession. The deliberately false police accusation typically relates to sexuality or violence and is especially effective if pertaining to what the police at least claims to be legal minors. Once “the deal” is secured is the victim threatened with prosecution unless the victim agrees to “become a police agent” as “community service” as leading to intelligence prostitution. A quickie judicial procedure and a false confession may also be used to deliberately tarnish the reputation of an LGBTQI victim so as to later impose coercive legal measures by claiming that the overt LGBTQI lifestyle and LGBTQI gender of the LGBTQI victim are “inherently criminal”, “sexually deviant” and/or expressive of “mental illness” and so try to incarcerate the LGBTQI victim as an ostensible “threat to public safety” and the like. If incarcerated may this be used to rape, commercially prostitute and otherwise sexually abuse the LGBTQI victim with the purpose of compelling the victim into accepting recruitment into intelligence prostitution. The next time the LGBTQI victim is deliberately falsely accused by the police with some police-invented accusation has the LGBTQI victim in her own mind already lost her own credibility in having already been convicted of something similar in a judicial quickie procedure and therefore believes that she now stands no chance if prosecuted and so is the LGBTQI victim easily extorted by the police into what turns out to be intelligence prostitution. “Fake judicial quickie procedures” may be used in interrogation in deluding the victim into believing that the victim participates in an actual quickie judicial procedure when in fact this has no legal basis whatsoever and is simply an illegal interrogation technique as deployed for the sole purpose of extorting the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is lured into having fully consensual sex with a seduction agent posing as belonging to a “vulnerable” category of persons such as a teenager above the age of consent, a person with purported intellectual disabilities, is seemingly deaf, seemingly impaired vision or ostensibly usually moving wheelchair, an elderly woman, an ostensibly married woman, a sex worker, a purported single mother or a young woman. Either the police or intelligence agents dressed as police later arrive and aggressively accuse the victim of rape or other sexual abuse and completely illegally tells the victim to either “cooperate with the police” in becoming “a police agent” (actually intelligence prostitution) or face prosecution despite this not being a police decision at all and intelligence agencies furthermore shy away from public exposure.
Rape agents are intelligence operatives who are specially trained to coerce victims into intelligence prostition through rape. Rape agents are usually males of unusual height, typically at least 190 centimeters or taller and are thus usually, yet certainly not always relatively easily recognizable as such. Rape recruitment can also take place through initially consensual group sex. Rape agents are often recruited among convicted serial rapists and are recruited by their parole officers who tell them that they will become conditionally released provided that they sign a form whereby they agree to intelligence recruitment. Brutal rapists are especially valued when selecting for potential rape agents.
Rape captivity trap
Police intelligence will continuously and serially so entice a victim into “coming home” with different seduction agents. The problem however is that these venues are not “home” but rather rape houses/apartments as maintained for purposes of coercive sexual recruitment and “intelligence training” whereby the victim is sexually abused in captivity for a week in order so as to crush the will of the victim and sexually coerce the victim into intelligence prostititution. The general method is to make the victim experience genuine sexual arousal while being abused in order so as to make the victim “like” the abuse. Thereafter is the victim commercially prostituted and subsequently brought into intelligence prostitution.
Rape agents deploy skills from the animal world. A victim may as part of a rape operation become treated like a cat in making similar sounds used by humans for attracting at cat and so trying to make the victim more comfortable with the predatory social behaviors of the rape agent and thus make the victim less resistant. The rape agent is trained to become a sexual predator and is trained to rape persons of all ages, including victims below the age of consent. Rape operations are referred to as “hunting” and a victim is regarded as a “trophy”. The core task of the rape agent is “break” the victim in coercing the victim into typically first commercial prostitution and subsequently intelligence prostitution. Once the rape agent has reached the phase of nearing physical attack will the rape agent typically try to “calm” the victim by various small words in using techniques from the animal world. The rape agent is trained to become sort of a predator and so uses various techniques used by animal predators to calm prey. Decoys agents (often teenager intelligence operatives) are deployed to lure the victim into a physical location where the victim will become more vulnerable to becoming raped.
The unsuspecting victim is raped by a sex partner who is actually a rape agent from the intelligence world. The victim is subsequently forced coerced into intelligence prostitution.
Rebellion regression trap
The victim is known to have had a rebellious past as a teenager and so operational techniques are deployed so as to provoke the victim into reenacting those very rebellious behaviors once more. The victim may become extra-judicially told by the police or other persons of authority “not to do do” something with the purpose of in fact fomenting rebellion and so encourage the victim to do precisely that. This is done with the intention of manipulating the victim into crossing the line into semi-legal or even illegal behavior. These documented behaviors (whether legal or not) are subsequently used to extract a direct or indirect admission of “wrongdoing” of some kind which in turn is used for the purpose of police sexual extortion as leading to intelligence recruitment into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is made to believe that the intelligence agency is sorry for behaving wrongly towards the victim and that intelligence recruitment is actually harmless and instead simply offers attractive career opportunities after “intelligence training”. The victim is made to believe that she has simply been subject to “intelligence training” and that the purpose was to help make the victim better and stronger. The intention is thus to make the victim more inclined towards accepting an offer of intelligence recruitment and subsequently signing an official document to this effect.
The victim has become intimate with a decoy agent. When being intimate does the decoy agent always speak in a regressive manner as if chronologically being a very young person despite not being so. An audial recording of the fully legal sexual relations with the seduction agent is used by the police when interrogating the victim in claiming that the victim had sexual relations with a legal minor below the age of consent. The police will try to delude the victim into believing that she committed a crime so as to extract an unfounded “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” and subsequently sexually extort the victim into intelligence prostitution. Another version takes place through an online chat and the police will later claim that the victim had a sex chat with a non-existent dependent child of the decoy agent as below the age of consent. Of course, no crime was committed as had that even been true had the victim acted in good faith in having simply been deceived. Nevertheless will the police try to extract an unfounded “acknowledgement of wrongdoing” in the police deceiving the victim into believing that she committed a crime and then claim that the victim confessed a crime (actually a non-crime) so as to sexually extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim becomes intimate with a decoy agent and later is the victim interrogated by the police who claims that the decoy agent did not really enjoy or actually want to participate in intimacy with the victim. The purpose is to extract an “acknowledgement of wrongdoing” such as an apology, an “explanation”, claiming that there was a “misunderstanding” or “promise not to do it again”. Irrespectively is this treated as if being a criminal confession by the police and used to sexually extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Rejuvenation porn trap
The victim like most other Internet users uses a major international porn portal online video aggregator to watch free pornography online. However certain unelective features increasingly appear in the stream of porn videos although the victim is unaware that it is the intelligence service which uses a mirroring police sexual entrapment website. First does pornographic videos appear with petite-looking adult porn actors. When the victim has come to sexually appreciate this aesthetic flavor does porn videos increasingly appear with clearly adult porn actors acting in theatric pornographic roles as if they were pre-pubescent children. The next step is that “amateur” videos with adult-looking teens appear. All this is legal since it is part of a major and serious website and in any case does the victim act in good faith in legal terms . However, in the next step does illegal videos appear with teenagers who seem to be legal minors and finally does advertisement appear for child pornography with pre-pubescent children. Since porn surfing usually takes place by surfing from video to video while masturbating may the victim become drawn along in not immediately ceasing watch tabs with porn actors who do not look adult. Since the victim is in a state of sexual arousal and considering the fact that sexual attraction is not taxonomic but fluid and individual is it easy for a sexually aroused victim to unthinkly go with the flow and thus become drawn into online police sexual entrapment.
Relative aggression trap
A close relative of the victim is voluntarily or coercively recruited by police intelligence and usually without being told about the future mission at the time of recruitment. The recruited relative is tasked with quarrelling with the victim in usually exploiting perceived or actual weak points in the victim in a way as designed to trigger anger and even aggression on the part of the victim. After the quarrel is there typically an attempt at reconciliation by the provocator relative and the purpose is to make the victim express an unfounded “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” as taped by police intelligence. If the victim is provoked into aggressive behavior and/or if a taped unfounded “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” is extracted is this deployed by the police in formal interrogation where the victim is accused of what is actually a non-statutory wrongdoing (i.e. a moral wrong which is certainly not a crime) whereby the police will pretend that the victim has “committed” and even “confessed” a criminal violation. The purpose is to extract a signed confession for a statutory violation which is subsequently used to offer the victim “a deal instead of prosecution” and the purpose is thus to lure the victim into accepting recruitment into what later turns out to be intelligence prostitution. Close relatives are useful as recruited provocators since a close relative is typically much more effective in provoking a victim into uncontrollable anger and a victim may be eager to reconcile with a close relative so as to patch up the relationship and may therefore be willing to provide an unfounded “acknowledgement of wrongdoing” as taped by police intelligence.
Relative anti-LGBTQI trap
The LGBTQI victim is serially sexually harassed and followed by an aggressive male intelligence operative who demands to have sex with the victim. The victim files a complaint with the police and is subsequently accused by the police of sexual misdemeanor against a relative of the perpetrator. The purpose is to draw the victim into scenes of interrogation where the victim feels a need to defend herself and thus give the police opportunity for manipulate interrogations for the purpose of extracting a false acknowledgment of wrongdoing as leading to sexual extortion so as to coerce the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Reunion with a friend
A seduction agents turns up and claims to be an old friend and the purpose is to introduce the victim to one or more other seduction agents with further operational aims of sexual entrapment as typically leading into group sex after which the police arrests the victim due to the victim not having bothered to check IDs of all participants. The victim is subsequently sexually extorted into intelligence prostitution.
Role model trap
The victim is repeatedly deliberately exposed to seduction agents performing social scenes intended to inspire the victim to precisely do that himself and of course with the purpose of tricking the person to engage in socio-sexual behavior that is either criminal or which the police in interrogation will afterwards deceive the victim into believing is criminal for the purpose of sexually extorting the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is made to believe that the victim has met her/his “missing half” when in fact this is a seduction agent from the intelligence community whose task is to manipulate the victim into saying and/or doing something which is subsequently used for police sexual extortion against the victim.
Rule sexual extortion trap
The victim is accused by an intelligence agent in a role of some kind of position of authority to have “broken a rule”. “The person in authority” states that he “is ready to overlook it this time around” in return for the victim having sex with the intelligence agent and unless the victim agrees does “the person in authority” threaten to report the victim to a superior, “the person in charge”. Some time after the victim is extorted into sex with “the person in authority” is the victim contacted by “the person in charge” who under threat of some punitive action extorts the victim to have sex with “the person in charge” as well. “The person in charge” then extorts the victim into commercial prostitution (“doing some favors and then I will leave you alone”) as leading to intelligence prostitution.
It is falsely claimed that malicious rumors are spread about the victim; this is done in order to extract a false confession (“implicit acknowledgment”) which is used by the police to sexually extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Sabotaging psychiatric appointment
The victim is already harassed by psychatry on the initiative of the police such as for leading a highly overt LGBTQI lifestyle or publicly endorsing an organization listed as terrorist although this legal classification is in some cases such as the feminist PKK clearly antiquated. Seduction agents (typically teenage intelligence prostitutes) are sent out to distract the victim so that the victim will miss her appointment with her psychiatrist, psychologist or other psychiatric appointment. This makes it legally possible to incarcerate the victim or legally apply other involuntary means against the victim as psychiatric incarceration may be used as a lever of power to force the victim into intelligence prosititution. Using psychiatry against political opponents was pionereed by the Gestapo in Nazi Germany and further developed by its East German Stasi successor as well as by the Soviet KGB and is still used against political opponents in many countries.
The victim manages to survive an almost or actually violent operational situation. “A savior” turns up and provokes feelings of gratefulness in the victim which facilitates for “the savior” to seduce and/or rape the victim and subsequently coerce the victim into commercial sex.
The victim is lured into conversation with children adjacent to a school or kindergarten. Underage seduction agents deployed there say hello to the victim and ask the victim questions. The unsuspecting victim politely responds to greetings and patiently answers questions. The police and psychiatry separately turn up and behave towards the victim as if the victim were a convicted sex offender. There is subsequently harsh interrogation by the police and by psychatriatry as tasked to do so by the police, all in order to force a false confession for a crime or non-crime for the purpose of intelligence recruitment into intelligence prostitution by means of police extortion.
The victim is subjected to situations where he may feel compelled to physically defend either himself or others. This is not only physically and psychologically dangerous but also legally risky since self-defense in actual legal practice is typically only semi-legal since persons engaging in self-defense causing physical harm will typically will face prosecution so as “to determine” whether their acts of self-defense were actually so also in legal terms. Since self-defense involves considerable legal risk will victims who have successfully defended themselves from physical violence typically accept intelligence/police recruitment rather than risk facing public prosecution. It is therefore essential to avoid situations where one may need to engage in acts of self-defense and when necessary strive to do so without causing any bodily harm whatsoever whether termporary or permanent.
A seduction agent from the intelligence community lures the victim into having semi-consensual sex and this is subsequently used by the police for sexually extorting the victim into intelligence recruitment and therefore also intelligence prostitution.
Older intelligence operatives are typically deployed as socio-sexual decoys as intended to drug victims and subsequently lure them into illegal intergenerational sex with seduction agents below the age of consent posing as “grandchildren”. Sex with sexually attractive persons who are significantly older than the victim is intended to individually break down the social taboo on intergenerational sexual intimacy. By subsequently successfully luring the victim into illegal intergenerational sex does subsequent police sexual extortion become particularly effective in coercing the victim into what turns out to be intelligence prostitution.
Serial blame operations
A series of events may be staged on different days and weeks by police intelligence so as to later be able to claim that the victim acted in bad faith. While this is not legally valid since every event stands on its own may it nevertheless be used to intimidate the victim into submitting to coercive intelligence recruitment.
Sex party trap
The victim is invited into an event which turns into a sex party where the victim also is lured into sex with a teenager below the age of consent as based on the general assumption that all participants are above the age of consent. All participants except the victim are intelligence prostitutes. Afterwards is the victim arrested, interrogated and extorted by the police into what turns out to be intelligence prostitution.
Sexual access operations
Cis-men tend to jump at opportunities for sex and so sexual access operations exploit this eagerness and readiness for sex for the purpose of sexual entrapment operations. This typically takes the form of a decoy agent having sex with the victim and afterwards claiming to be a sex worker and demanding money in claiming that the victim “should have understood” her purportedly being a commercial sex worker. If the victim does not pay is the victim threatened into paying by an intelligence operative or undercover police officer playing the role of a pimp. Once the victim has paid is the victim arrested by the police and accused of illegally paying for prostitution. Another common version is a decoy agent in the role of a single mother and her purpose is to lure the victim into some ambiguous kind of proximity with a legal minor below the age of consent without the consent of the adult victim in private space after which the adult victim is arrrested by the police and accused of being a sex criminal and after mock interrogation sexually extorted into intelligence prostitution. Single mother genders and prostition genders are especially used in sexual access operations due to these categories of women having a reputation for being “sexually easy”.
The person is lured into sex with one or more seduction agents from the intelligence community. This may include seduction agents below the age of consent.
Sexual harassment trap
The male victim is approached by flirtatious females, typically teenage girls above the age of consent. Later is the male accused of sexual harassment against underage girls and asked to never do this again. This promise is legally speaking a false confession for a crime which never took place. The false “confession” is subsequently used to extort the victim into intelligence recruitment.
Sex work trap
The victim is enticed, lured, seduced and/or raped into commercial prostitution for the purpose of later coercively recruiting the victim into becoming a intelligence seduction agent.
The victim is subjected to stress by intelligence operatives while shopping. The purpose is to make the victim stress out so that the victim will leave the store without paying. While on the way out is the victim stopped by an intelligence agent in the role of a security guard, employee or owner of the store. The victim is offered “to work” instead of being handed over to the police. The thankful victim agrees and is taken to a separate room where a highly physically attract manager awaits and orders the victim to engage in sexual acts “or else”. The fearful victim agrees and more “employees” are called into the room where the victim is raped and subsequently commercially prostituted and later coerced into intelligence prostitution.
Due to feeling depressed because of police-organized sexual harassment does the LGBTQI victim seek help from a psychotherapist who is subsequently tasked by the police with informal interrogation.
Signing document trap
The victim is interrogated by the police with the purpose of the victim admitting to something (even a non-crime) of a sexual nature and told that the victim “will not be released” unless the s/he signs a document which could either involve a false confession and/or a form agreeing to police/intelligence recruitment. Either way can the document be used for forcing the victim into intelligence prostitution. An intelligence agent posing as a “lawyer” may also be deployed so as to “help” the victim into signing something against the interests of the victim.
Single mum trap
Single mum traps are typically deployed against lesbian victims and against men who either due to difference of age, feminism or otherwise are open to a relationship with a single mum. Once the victim has been lured into a parental or semi-parental role will the police typically deliberately falsely accuse the victim of sexually molesting the child. This mock accusation is particularly effective in extorting most victims to consent to intelligence recruitment which as it turns out is primarily about intelligence prostitution.
The victim is enticed to sit down near physically attractive seduction agent(s) in a way that is certainly not illegal yet the police will subsequently falsely claim that it is. The victim contacts the seduction agent(s) after sitting down. This is because the seduction agent(s) is/are below the age of consent but looks as if they were above the age of consent. While certainly not prosecutable or even illegal can the police burst in and arrest the victim and generally treat the victim as if the victim has committed a serious crime when in fact the act of sitting down and commencing a conversation constitutes no crime whatsoever. The victim is subjected to aggressive interrogation by the police, accused of being sexually deviant, a sex criminal and coerced to “confess” the non-crime. The victim is told that she will be held in police custody indefinitely unless she signs a document handed to her by the police which is both a false confession and an “agreement” to become “a police agent”. If she does not agree to sign the document is she “correctively raped” by the police until she signs the document.
A situation is deliberately created by intelligence operatives so as to provoke some behavior and/or draw the victim into a series of events which the victim herself would certainly not have agreed to participate in but is nevertheless unwittingly drawn into. A situational operation may involve a large number of intelligence operatives, a more limited number of intelligence operatives or only one intelligence operative. The purpose is anyhow to draw a person into a behavioral drama and of course so without the prior consent of the victim. A situational operation can be performed anywhere whether in private space, in public space or as part of professional roles such as police-instigated informal interrogation by psykiatric employees as recruited by the police or sexual harassment by agents of the police as intended to provoke the victim into unintentional behavior as creating some basis or non-basis for police extortion leading to recruitment into intelligence prostitution.
The victim finds herself in a complex social situation as intended to lure her into something that she would perhaps not otherwise agree to.
Social services harassment against LGBTQI persons
Social workers as recruited, trained and tasked by the police accuse the victim of having a “sick” (i.e. openly LGBTQI) gender and a “criminal sexual” (i.e. openly LGBTQI) lifestyle. The victim may be threatened with loss of welfare benefits and/or child custody unless the victim consents to going back into the closet. The social worker also engages in informal interrogation under the guise of a professional vow of silence while in fact the conversation is actually taped by the police. The purpose is to extract intentionally misleading conversational documentation for which the victim could subsequently become sexually extorted into intelligence prostitution. Forcing the victim away from public space is however a smokescreen for luring the victim into situations where the victim becomes more vulnerable to sexual entrapment operations.
The victim is stopped in the street by the police and interrogated without cause and treated as if the victim were a sex worker. The victim is accused of violating an actual or non-existing law and once confession is secured is the victim either raped by the police or otherwise effectively coerced into providing free sexual services to the police with the purpose of forcing the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The LGBTQI victim is stalked in public space by police and their agents such as uniformed security guards and this is done in order so to force the LGBTQI person off from public space and into situations where the victim becomes more vulnerable to sexual entrapment operations. The person may be arrested on false charges for living openly LGBTQI and this is of course done in order to force a false confession. The police is interested in instantly detecting what is from their perspective any legally ambiguous situation for which they subsequently will try to extract a false confession after arresting the victim without or with questionable legal ground. The legal pretext is the claim that the victim intends to prostitute herself and once “evidence” is found for that is the victim turned over to psychiatry where further abuses and informal interrogations ensue.
The victim is psychologically deliberately manipulated into falling in love with another person who subsequently makes herself partly or entirely unavailable to the victim. The intention is that the victim will engage in courtship so that the victim can be accused of stalking. The victim is interrogated by the police and pressured to confess to stalking. After the confession is the victim raped by the police intelligence operatives with the purpose of forcing the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is repeatedly subjected to criminal stigmatization and accused of being sexually deviant. This is done because it is known in criminological literature that recidivist criminal behavior becomes far more likely if an adolescent criminal offender is stigmatized as intrinsically criminal. The purpose is to induce the victim to perform either a sex crime (e.g. sexual harassment) or a non-crime of socio-sexual or sexual nature which the victim afterwards in an interrogation of some kind can be deceived to believe to be criminal and in either case with the purpose of extracting a confession of some kind that can be used for police sexual extortion for the purpose of intelligence recruitment into intelligence prostitution.
Street child trap
The victim is befriended by a legal minor either below or above the age of consent with the appearance of being a homeless person but whom is actually an intelligence prostitute. After the compassionate victim opens his home to the purportedly needy younger person is the victim sexually harassed, sexually extorted and raped either by a person posing as pimp and/or by a police intelligence operative.
Subjective conversation interrogation
Formal/informal interrogator(s) engage(s) in casual subjective conversation in expressing seeming sentiments of “common morality” (actually premeditated moral prejudice!) which in fact are carefully calibrated manipulative utterances as intended to extract from the victim what could indirectly be construed as explicit/implicit “acknowledgment of wrongdoing”. The purpose is to make the victim engage in concessionary conversation where the victim would acknowledge “not being 100% right” in “moral terms”, such as “partially having acted out of bad judgment” or “having made a mistake”. The purpose is to extract something that could be claimed to constitute a “confession” of ostensible personal moral failure and then threaten the victim with the police pressing charges (despite the police having no such powers!) so as to extort the victim into intelligence prostitution, including frequently through sex with a police officer.
A teenage entrapment agent approaches the victim and asks either for money or that the victim buys something for her such as a fashion item. The teenage entrapment agent subsequently makes herself sexually available and they have sexual relations. The victim is subsequently arrested and interrogated by the police. If the teenage entrapment agent is above the age of consent has however no crime been committed, yet the police will nevertheless seek to extract a false confession for purchase of sexual services from a minor. Subsequent to a false confession for a non-crime is the victim pressured into providing sexual services to the police with the purpose of luring the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The LGBTQI victim is intimidated from further frequenting public space as herself by exploiting the victim’s belief in superstitions and instead force her into situations where she becomes more vulnerable to sexual entrapment and sexual violence.
Surprise dating operations
The victim believes herself to participate in a casual meeting with a colleague/boss/subordinate from work, with a business partner/acquaintance, in a meetup as part of civil society or simply “someone” the victim believes to be a “friend”. What seems like an innocuous get-together or random meetup is quickly/gradually taken over by deceptive seduction techniques such as negging on the part of an intelligence operative whether a rape agent, a proactive seduction agent or a decoy seduction agent. Whether leading to sex or not is the operative purpose to provoke behaviors in the victim that can subsequently be used for false interrogation and sexual extortion purposes as leding to recruitment into intelligence prostitution. The victim may become deliberately falsely acccused by the police of engaging in prostitution, trying to prostitute others, trying to purchase commercial sexual services, sexual harassment, rape, statutory rape, “grooming” someone who is either adult or actually above the age of consent and virtually any sexual/social non-crime, sexual/social “moral crime” or sexual statutory crime for which an acknowledgment of wrongdoing is extracted and subsequently used for sexually extorting the victim into intelligence prostitution. “Post-date” interrogation can be performed by a boss, a relative, a “journalist”, the victim’s offspring, a person working in a helpline, a restaurant employee, a security guard, a psychotherapist or just about about anyone (including the victim’s spouse) may become voluntariliy/coercively recruited by police intelligence into becoming a civic interrogator. The interrogator may also likely simply be yet another undercover intelligence operative. If the victim herself is subjected to a sexual crime (e.g. date rape) and files a police complaint will she find herself the subject of intentionally false accusations, formal police interrogation, become deceptively “informed” about non-existent plaintiff(s) and subjected to deceptive threats of “the police prosecuting her” despite the police having no such powers. The victim herself is vulnerable to police/intelligence rape during formal/informal interrogation and especially if falsely accused of selling sexual services. If the imposed date is a rape agent and there are subsequent sexual relations will the victim become forced into commercial prostitution after “the date” as leading into intelligence prostitution. The victim may also become charged money by an intelligence operative posing as a “pimp” due to the victim having had spend time and/or had sex with the imposed date decoy seduction agent. If the victim pays or files a police complaint about the “pimp” harassment will he become interrogated by the police for “illegally” purchasing sexual services. If he does not pay is he raped by the rape agent “pimp” and forced into commercial prostitution as leading to intelligence prostitution.
Plainclothes police officers and/or police agents move around, pass closely by, even physically touch and/or verbally approach the victim while the victim engages in public social life as an open LGBTQI person, such as in public cruising.
At first does the sexually attractive and exquisitly charming formal/informal interrogator play god cop in deploying various deceptive means to make the victim apologize, “explain herself” and/or admit some kind of wrongdoing in the interrogator extracting some kind of implicit statement from the victim. If and when this does not work may the interrogator switch from sub to Dom/Domme and this may in any case be deployed once some kind of acknowledgment of wrongdoing is extracted. This is non-consensual BDSM socio-sexual roleplay as transferred to the domain of formal/informal interrogation. The pace of rhetorical aggression may accelerate very quickly and the purpose is to produce discursive consent by means of causing sexual excitement in the victim. The purpose as usual is to extract some kind of false “acknowledgment of wrongdoing such as admission of a non-crime which in turn can be used by the police to extort the victim into “accepting” becoming a police/intelligence agent as of course leading to intelligence prostitution.
The police asks the tax authority to “closely investigate” the victim as part of the police sexual harassment campaign against an LGBTQI victim.
The victim is subjected to formal interrogation by the police and the police claims that something falsely constitutes admission of wrongdoing on the part of the victim when in fact the victim made no admission of wrongdoing whatsoever. This is another trick for the police to extract a false confession for a non-crime. The purpose is to deceive the victim into believing that the victim did something unlawful when in fact the police is perfectly aware that nothing illegal whatsoever took place. The purpose is to draw the victim into a deceptive conversation which in turn the police will use as non-proof by again claiming that the conversation constitutes confirmation of the non-admission of the non-crime. The police disingenously claims that they have a legal confession for the non-crime when in fact there was neither confession nor crime. However, by drawing the victim into the interrogation posing as a conversation does the police hope to extract something which they can use for sexual extortion against the victim for the purpose of “recruiting” the victim “to help the police” as a police agent, the transparent purpose of which it is drawing the victim into intelligence prostitution.
If a victim is meticulous about checking and even photographically documenting IDs of teenage sex partners and if the legal age and the picture in the ID are at least physically plausible is the sexual interaction legal in most jurisdiction unless another infringement of law is involved such as illegal same-sex sexual intercourse which remains illegal in many jurisdictions. However, the victim may still be harassed by the police and interrogated on the basis of false claims that a teenager (or in the case of group sex one of the teenagers) was purporedly below the age of consent and deceived by the victim by using her elder’s sibling’s or friend’s ID. Such a lie may be quite persuasive, yet as long as the victim does not directly or indirectly admit any wrongdoing on her part such as apologizing or “acknowledging a misunderstanding” or otherwise accepting the false claims, premises and pretenses of the police has the police not succeeded in extracting a false confession. The police will nevertheless endeavor to falsely convince the innocent victim that the victim is ostensibly a “paedophile” and a sex offender. The victim is offered “a deal of cooperation” by the police and if “accepted” is the victim subsequently raped by police rape agents and coerced into intelligence prostitution.
Teenage sex talk
The victim is contacted by teenage intelligence operatives, at least some of whom are below the age of consent and subsequently drawn into a conversation about sexuality. While this in and of itself is legal is the purpose to draw the victim into a flirt whereby the conversation will turn more intimate. The police will subsequently turn up, “save the children” as well as arrest and interrogate the victim in falsely claiming that the victim has committed a crime despite sexual education remaining legal.
The victim is enticed into legal sex with teenagers who are police agents, e.g. teenage prostitutes, teenage seduction agents or police-recruited ordinary teenagers simply enticed by the fun and adventure. The victim is subsequently lured into having sex with a teenager below the age of consent who is actually an underage seduction agent from the intelligence community. This of course is extremely effective in extorting the victim to do exactly as the police wants, including providing free sexual services to the police and subsequently becoming an intelligence prostitute.
Teenage seduction agents pose considerable risks to a potential victim unless the victim is careful to ask for and document identification. Teenageers vary much in physiological development and so is it essential to carefully check and also photographically document the chronological age when showing identification documents so so as to make sure that the person is indeed above the age of consent in your jurisdiction. However, if the victim is not careful in checking and documenting IDs will the victim become contacted by the police who will claim that the teenager(s) was/were below the age of consent. Since intelligence operatives use false IDs or no IDs at all can such interrogation become very effective in sexually extorting the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Telephone “friendly police” interrogation trap
After a formal police interrogation that failed to secure anything even resembling a “confession” does the “friendly interrogator” make a phone call to the victim in having one or more “questions” that are actually trick questions, some of which will make the victim “seem incriminated” irrespective of responding yes or no. The victim as most humans beings probably appreciate being at the center of attention and so stands at service in “answering questions” that seem to be of a purely technical caracter and so the victim feels that she simply provides information to the “friendly interrogator”. The victim may do so patiently or even happily in being flattered by the attention yet is not fully aware that what takes place is actually a taped interrogation and the purpose is to secure some kind of false “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” that can be claimed to be a “confession” for the purpose of the police subsequently sexually and/or otherwise extorting the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Telephone police harassment
The police wakes the victim up by phone, typically early in office hours when the victim is still half-asleep and the purpose is to use the state of the victim being half-asleep to produce a misunderstanding of sort that can be construed as some kind of “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” which in turn can be treated as an implicit confession on the basis of which the police can sexually extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Terrorist dummy charge
The victim is required to come to the police station for a formal interrogation regarding a non-crime involving purported or actual intimacy. Little is she aware that this is merely an excuse for once there is she accused of involvement in terrorism. The police claims that the victim’s friends are members of a terrorist organization and the police disingenously suggests that the victim’s assocation with her friend is a punishable crime of terrorism. The victim is unpreparared for the investigation and confirms the non-crimes involving her association with her friends. The police in turn claims that this admission of non-crimes constitute admission of crime and that this is sufficient for pressing charges against the victim. The victim is disingenously invited to “avoid prosecution against the victim” if the victim agrees to become an anti-terrorist police agent. If the victim agrees is the victim considered as having agreed to intelligence recruitment and if not is the victim accused of being a terrorist or terrorist accomplice by “refusing to cooperate with the police”. The police disingenously claims that a refusal to accept intelligence recruitment only confirms that the victim is a terrorist or a terrorist accomplice who refuses to cooperate with the police. This is turn is used to extort the victim into intelligence recruitment as later leading to intelligence prostitution.
A threesome operation may be simply be a threesome trap where the victim is informally induced during or after sexual intercourse to politely and socially competently so apologize for something sexual despite the victim not having done anything wrong or at least not something illegal but the victim is nevertheless manipulated to “apologize” out of respect for what the victim is manipulated into believing are the genuine feelings of a fellow sentient person who is actually a professional seduction agent pretending to be offended as part of a sexual entrapment intelligence operations. Threesome operations however typically involve drawing the victim into yet other social contexts where the victim becomes vulnerable to further sexual entrapment operations and in particular so alcohol venues such as nightclubs, sex clubs etc. Agreed sexual relations easily transform into offering or receiving commercial sexual services and perhaps so even without the knowledge of the victim and commercial prostitution also easily transforms into intelligence prostitution. The couple may induce the victim into sex with legal minor seduction agents above or below the age of consent and with regard to sexual orgies can the police later deliberately falsely claim that a participant was below the age of consent, that a passive participant never actually agreed to sex etc. in order so as to extract an “acknowledgement of wrongdoing” such as an apology, an explanation, an emotional appeal, or lying/blaming/denying, accepting false premises deliberately put forward by the police interrrogator(s) etc. in order for the police to sexually extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim is enticed into a threesome with a couple who are of course intelligence operatives. One of them is on a decoy mission while the other is on a proactive seduction mission. Either in the middle of sexual intercourse or afterwards will the decoy (who has a sexually passive operative role) falsely claim that the victim has done something sexually against the will of the generally sexually passive decoy agent. Despite the victim having done nothing wrong is the purpose to make the victim apologize out of courtesy and empathy for someone’s purported “feelings”. The proactive seduction while generally reasonably well-behaved may however slightly pressure the victim to sensitively “apologize” to the decoy agent so as to “leave this behind” and instead continue with sexual intercourse. The pair may be of any genders and they may meet regularly with the victim so as to ultimately create a situation for which they may be able to extract an “apology of wrongdoing”. After the victim (who also may be of any gender) has apologized despite having done nothing wrong is the victim interrogated by the police on the basis of the courteous apology which is deliberately treated as if it were a criminal confession. The police will manipulatively endeavor to deceive the victim into believing that the victim has committed a sexual misdemeanor and that the decoy agent has filed a police complaint with the proactive seduction agent in the role of a “witness”. There are generally two police interrogators who are typically physically attractive intelligence seduction agents as tasked with commencing a threesome with the victim. Once the police threesome has commenced is the sexual intercourse used to extract a renewed/confirmed apology as if it were not a real interrogation “but only play”. Once the apology is confirmed is the victim raped and subsequently extorted and/or otherwise coerced into intelligence prostitution under threat of “police prosecution” despite the police having no powers of prosecution.
Transage IRL trap
Adolescent seduction agents may manipulatively use the age of consent so as to sexually extort a victim into commercial prostitution. For example may an adolescent seduction agent say that she is above the age of consent while later after having sex claiming that she is not in order so as to sexually extort a victim for sex and/or money and for luring the victim into commercial prostitituion as leading to intelligence prostitution. The police may deploy mock interrogation in falsely claiming that the seduction agent is/was below the age of consent in order so as provoke an unfounded “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” which is subsequently used to sexually extort the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Transage online trap
Social media have become a major venue for police/intelligence sexual entrapment operations and mostly so for purposes of coercive intelligence recruitment by means of police sexual extortion. The victim may befriend an online adult persona (actually a police intelligence operative) who may sometimes behave in a so called “childlike” manner. This behavior is typically deployed after the victim has already had cybersex with or at least had a general discussion pertaining to relationships/intimacy and/or politics thereof with the online adult persona. The police will later use this for mock interrogation purposes in falsely claiming the online “friend” being or having been below the age of consent in telling the victim that “she ought have understood”. The police may also falsely claim that the victim ostensibly chatted with a dependent child of the online “friend” and here too claim that the victim “ought have understood” despite psychological age only vaguely correlating with chronological age; including but not limited to transage persons, greatly varying individual IQ levels, degrees of asexuality, individual degree of education and lack thereof as well as individual degree of psychological maturity as largely independent of chronological age. Once the victim accepts such a patently false extra-judicial premise of the police (the person doing impersonation is legally and morally solely responsible for his own behavior) in the police extracting an unfounded “acknowledgment of wrongdoing” from the victim will the police disingenuously treat this as a “criminal confession” in seeking to sexually extort the victim into intelligence prostitution in without basis threatening the victim with e.g. prosecution, extradition, incarceration, investigation, psychiatry, public embarassment, telling close family and thus risk breakup of a committed relationship as well as involving social services in deploying implicit threats of losing custody over one’s own children, losing welfare benefits and the like.
The victim is lured into social and/or sexual interaction with a seduction agent sent out in a transgender social role. Since there may typically be social confusion about what ought be considered appropriate behavior in interaction with a transgender person is it typically easy for the police to accuse the victim of “wrongdoing” which the victim is subsequently provoked into at least in part “acknowledging”. It is also easy for the police to pretend to misunderstand behaviors of the victim in claiming that the victim has done something wrong legally speaking. Since most humans to at least to some degree engage in transphobic behaviors towards transgender people can the victim even be accused of a hate crime as well as moral crimes of a social/sexual nature. The intelligence operative may actually be transgender or this may be an assumed operative role which the intelligence operative has already been trained for performing. Since it is difficult even for transgender people themselves to not do at least something “wrong” (e.g. using wrong pronouns or making ciscultural assumptions) with a transgender person does this constitute fertile ground for formal police interrogation with the purpose of sexually extorting the victim into intelligence prostitution.
The victim meets an attractive persona from another country through social media, such as through an international dating site. The victim agrees to travel to the other country to visit the new “friend”. After arriving at the international airport of the country of destination is she abducted, “correctively raped” and forced into commercial prostitution. After a while is she contacted by a customer who introduces himself as an intelligence agent who offers her what she thinks is freedom and a new attractive career path. Relieved does she agree to intelligence recruitment after which of course everything becomes far worse until she is sexually crushed and has become a mere operational tool in the hands of her new intelligence handler. She is unaware that her social media contact was an intelligence recruiter using a fictional online identity and that the commercial prostitution was mere psychological preparation, indeed “training” for intelligence prostitution.
The legally adul victim may become lured, enticed, extorted and/or forced into illegal underage religious “marriage”. The victim is subsequently either forced into prostitution by relatives of “the spouse” or exorted by the police into intelligence prostitution.
Undercover intelligence operatives
An undercover intelligence operative may be an actual police officer. E.g. a purported security guard may actually be an undercover police officer who has also undergone intelligence training. An intelligence agent provoking a brawl may be someone highly trained in martial arts and so violence needs be avoided in most situations unless absolutely necessary indeed. An undercover agent may simply be an ordinary citizen (such as a shop employeesas recruited for a police undercover mission) and if this is the case probably does not know anything about the victim or the true nature of the mission and may have been falsely told that the victim is a terrorist, a serial sex offender or suspect serial murderer.
The victim meets an enticing teenager who expresses intimate interest in the victim. The victim asks for ID but the victim claims to have no ID due to being an illegal or otherwise undocumented alien. The victim accepts the stated age and later has sexual relations with the teenage agent after which the victim is arrested and interrogated by the police who tells the victim that she had has had sexual intercourse with a person who is either below the age of consent or “believed to be” under the age of consent. This in turn is used for police sexual extortion so as to coercively recruit the victim into intelligence prostitution.
Uniformed police officer
An intelligence operative dressed in police uniform may simultaneously also serve as a police officer (intelligence operatives usually have a day job) or simply be an intelligence operative dressed in police uniform and falsely claiming to be a police officer for the purpose of the operation. In either case is the operative typically unwilling to prove that s/he is a police officer and will therefore either refuse to or be reluctant to show official police ID.
The victim has been subjected to police-organized sexual harassment for some time. Suddenly it all ends yet the victim is scheduled for a mock interrogation with a very nice and attractive police officer. The victim is operationally encouraged to start thinking that she may have been insane all the time rather than systematically sexually harassed. The purpose is to deceive and manipulate the victim into wrongly thinking that she may have done something wrong and therefore make her apologize for actually having done nothing wrong whatsoever. The purpose is to extract some kind of acknowledgment which can be used as basis for police sexual extortion leading to intelligence recruitment into involuntary intelligence prostitution.
Exploitation of individual weakness as detected in the victim may be exploited in any sexual entrapment operation. E.g. may the victim have difficulty controlling himself sexually in certain situations such as under pressure. The intelligence agency is specialized at detecting individual weaknesses such as as particular sexual interests and exploiting those perceived individual weaknesses as part of sexual entrapment operations.
Victim of crime trap
The victim is subjected to one or more crimes as committed by intelligence operatives as deliberate provocation(s). The victim files a complaint with the police and the perpetrators subsequently surprisingly accuse the victim of committing a criminal offence. The victim is interrogated by the police using manipulative methods geared towards extracting a false confession which is subsequently used for the purpose of police sexual extortion so as to coerce the victim into intelligence prostitution.
A white knight (a person purportedly intervening to “save” a usually female person) may appear in a variety of social roles but is usually male. A white knight may also be an undercover police officer and may subsequently abduct/arrest the victim for ostensible sexual misdemeanor. Some white knights are rape agents. An important purpose of the white knight is to provoke aggressive behavior on the part of the victim which the police can later claim to constitute statutory crimes. Once acknowledgment of wrongdoing has been extracted from the victim is the victim sexually extorted into intelligence prostitution.
White knight trap
The victim speaks to a seduction agent and is subsequently approached by a male seduction agent who asks the first seduction agent whether she is all right? This is done with the purpose of provoking a fight. The male seduction agents as it turns out plays the role of a pimp in the entrapment operation. The victim is arrested by police officers, interrogated, extorted and given the false choice between either police intelligence recruitment or else the false threat of prosecution for soliciting a prostitute as well as physical assault. The police cannot prosecute anyone and so this an empty threat unless the victim is a VIP whose reputation the intelligence service seeks to tarnish.
The victim is befriended by a small family of purported “war refugees” (all of them actually intelligence prostitutes); a purported “widow”, “her parent” and “her children”. The woman is eager to get married again, “her former husband” is it claimed died in war. Everyone is very friendly and the victim commences a relationship leading to the victim becoming seduced by the “widow’s” undeage children “child/ren” below the age of consent. The victim is drugged to manipulate her/his behavior and subsequently seduced by the sexually experienced child/ren. The victim is arrested and sexually extorted by the police into intelligence recruitment.
The victim takes home one or more youth (seduction agents who are teenagers or in their early twenties) without checking IDs. Prior to any commencement of sexual acts does the police burst in and arrest the victim in her home. The victim is held at the police station and later interrogated and it is falsely claimed by the police that the youth were below the age of consent. However, this seems plausible to the victim considering the police action at the victim’s home and so is the victim “offered a way out” by agreeing to intelligence recruitment. This seems like an attractive proposal and the victim is made to feel as if the police has done her a favor, both by preventing what she is falsely made to believe would have been illegal sexual acts, by “offering her a way out” and by offering her what she is falsely led to believe to be “a new interesting career path”. The victim is unaware that she is being deceived, subjected to a confidence trick and extorted into intelligence prostitution. If she only brought home one youth and checked the ID, then she is falsely yet plausibly told that the youth used the ID of an elder friend or sibling. If however, she brought home several youth and checked all IDs beforehand, then the police may still claim that one of the youth used a false ID. The police may in any case still plan to use the youth to lure the victim into sexual relations with intelligence operatives below the age of consent for the purpose of later police extortion into intelligence prostitution.
The Intelligence Entrapment Methods documentation project.