Extra-Judicial Persecution of Perceived Minorities of Desire

There is a long history of systemic and organized mistreatment as regards perceived members of perceived minorities of desire as perpetrated by government agencies. This mistreatment is partly judicial and partly extrajudicial as depending on the specific jurisdiction.

justice-2060093_1280

I. Considerations

There are fundamentally two kinds of considerations involved as motivating organized persecution by government agencies against perceived members of perceives minorities of desire. The first consideration pertains to the act itself and the second consideration pertains to any non-secret nature of such an act.

II. Motivations

Motivations for such organized crime by government agencies are of many types:

Maintaining the reproductive sexual norm, i.e. Western heteroculture.

Religious/moralistic zeal.

Upholding of sexual hypocrisy.

Defending patriarchal/ethnocratic “public order”.

Ensuring economic exploitation of prostitution and personal benefit thereof.

Ensuring sexual exploitation of females and personal benefit thereof.

Ensuring sexual exploitation of children and personal benefit thereof.

Ensuring sexual exploitation of youth and personal benefit thereof.

Ensuring sexual exploitation of sex workers and personal benefit therof.

Sexual exploitation of perceived members of perceived members of desire and extrajudicially imposing and perpetuating perceived but actually not existing monopolies of certain sexual practice for certain occultist pseudo-religious societies.

Intelligence recruitment of perceived members of perceived members of desire as intelligence prostitutes (seduction agents).

III. Excuses

The excuses deployed to justify this organized perpetration of crime on by government employees as more or less implicitly internally accepted in certain government agencies are fundamentally different from considerations and motivations.

General Excuses

Deliberately deployed extrajudicial faux arguments of the kind that are only permitted for legal counsel to put forth.

Extra-judicial charges (i.e. accusing/charging a person with a non-crime)

Fabricated evidence.

Mock procedure

Mock interrogation,

Mock charges

Mock process

Mock verdict

Legal entrapment operations.

Illegal entrapment operations.

Denial of due process.

Miscarriage of justice

Deployment of accusation of diagnosis.

Arguing/acting as if diagnostic condition were a criminal misdemeanor.

Abusing protectively persons subject to protective recruitment for purposes of extrajudicial harassment.

Claiming that persecution constitutes protective recruitment.

Claiming that persecution constitutes intelligence training.

Claiming that organized police crime is accepted legal practice.

Claiming that intelligence crime is accepted legal practice.

Describing constitutional law as illusory (unenforceable) law.

Describing legal precedents as illusory (unenforceable) law.

Claiming that sexual orientation of minorities of desire constitutes insanity.

Subjecting persecuted persons to psychiatric abuse as ordered by police intelligence secret kangaroo court.

Citing need to protect operational methods.

Citing need to protect ongoing operations.

Citing need to protect intelligence operatives.

Citing need to protect “witnesses”.

Claiming need to protect non-existent “witness”.

Claiming need to protect false “witness”.

Claiming that police crime is justified due to being secretly/implicitly approved by police intelligence protectively recruited prosecutors as prosecutors had any legal authority to permit criminal activity.

References “operational considerations” in ways that are distinctly illegal.

References to “national security” in ways that are distinctly illegal.

References to “international practice” in ways distinctly illegal.

References to “intelligence cooperation” in ways distinctly illegal.

References “public safety” in ways distinctly illegal.

References to “public security” in ways distinctly illegal.

References to “safety of legal minors” in ways distinctly illegal.

References to “safety of women” in ways distinctly legal.

Formal arguments that constitute illegal discrimination.

Formal arguments which constitute indirect discrimination.

Deliberately fallacious arguments.

Secret intelligence diagnosis.

Secret fabricated intelligence diagnosis.

Secret evidence.

Secret fabricated evidence.

Denying a defendant the right to conduct defense.

Denying a defendant a proper defense attorney.

Assigning a police agent as defense counsel.

Police intelligence practices of instructing judges/jurors to issue certain verdict on the base of secret evidence.

Police intelligence practices of instructing judges/jurors to issue certain verdict on the basis of fabricated evidence.

Police intelligence practices of instructing judges/jurors to issue certain verdict on the basis of non-crime.

Police intelligence practices of instructing judges/jurors to issue certain verdict on the basis of “verdict” in police kangaroo secret court.

Police intelligence practices of instructing judges/jurors to issue certain verdict on the basis of extrajudicial ostensible “police law”.  

Police intelligence practices of instructing judges/jurors to issue certain verdict on extrajudicial “legal practice”.

Protecting organized crime as under extrajudicial practices of “protective taxation” of police intelligence.

Issuance of extrajudicial order of police detention.

Issuance of extrajudicial order of psychiatric incarceration.

Issuance of extrajudicial order of house arrest.

Issuance of extrajudicial order of limitation on movement.

Issuance of extrajudicial charge.

Issuance of extrajudicial verdict.

Issuance of extrajudicial sentence.

Claimed need to perform harassment as “investigation”.

Claimed need to perform harassment as “interrogation”.

Claimed need to perform harassment as “legal process”.

Claimed need to perform harassment as “appeal”.

Claimed need to perform harassment as illegal entrapment.

Claimed need to perform sexual harassment as “investigation”.

Claimed need to perform sexual harassment as “interrogation”.

Claimed need to perform sexual harassment as “legal process”.

Claimed need to perform sexual harassment as “appeal”.

Claimed need to perform sexual harassment as illegal entrapment.

Claimed need to perform legal harassment as “investigation”.

Claimed need to perform legal harassment as “interrogation”.

Claimed need to perform legal harassment as “legal process”.

Claimed need to perform legal harassment as “appeal”.

Claimed need to perform legal harassment as illegal entrapment.

Claimed need to perform extrajudicial harassment as “investigation”.

Claimed need to perform extrajudicial harassment as “interrogation”.

Claimed need to perform extrajudicial harassment as “legal process”.

Claimed need to perform extrajudicial  harassment as “appeal”.

Claimed need to perform extrajudicial harassment as illegal entrapment.

Claimed need to perform police intelligence harassment litigation so as to distract the harassed person.

Claiminged need for extrajudicial “special method”.

Claimed need for committing crimes in order to operationally prevail.

Claimed need to perform police intelligence extortion for protective recruitment purpose.

Extrajudicial forms of protective recruitment.

Criminal forms of protective recruitment.

Faux protective recruitment.

Claiming that unlegislated rules of intelligence agencies constitute law.

Claiming that illegal measure is legal if justified by Interpol.

Claiming that extrajudicial measure is legal if justified by Interpol.

Claiming that premises of sexual subcultures must be raided in the the interest of of public safety.

Claiming that premises of sexual subcultures must be raided in the the interest of of public security.

Claiming that sexual subcultures must be harassed in the interest of “public order”.

Claiming that psychiatric abuse is legitimate in order so as to maintain “public order”.

Claiming that psychiatric abuse is legitimate in order so as to maintain “public safety”.

Claiming that psychiatric abuse is legitimate in order so as to “protect boys from sexual abuse”.

Claiming that psychiatric abuse is legitimate in order so as to “protect girls from sexual abuse”.

Claiming that psychiatric abuse is legitimate in order so as to “protect children from sexual abuse”.

Claiming that psychiatric abuse is legitimate in order so as to “protect women from sexual harassment”.

Claiming that psychiatric abuse is legitimate in order so as to “protect men from sexual harassment.”

Claiming that psychiatric abuse is legitimate in order so as to “protect heterosexuals from sexual harassment”.

Deployment of police officers against law-abiding citizens.

Deployment of police intelligence operatives against law-abiding citizens.

Deployment of citizens as police against against law-abiding citizens.

Pretending to suspect crime.

Pretending to conduct investigation.

Pretending to prevent crime in carrying out entrapment.

Hiding evidence

Refusing to provide evidence to defense attorney

Anti-LGBTQI Excuses

Claiming that being transgender is a sexual orientation.

Claiming that being transage is a sexual orientation.

Claiming that LGBTQI persons are potential sexual offenders.

Claiming fabricated “risk of lapse into insanity”.

Claiming that  LGBTQI gender expression “offends the public”

Claiming that LGBTQI age expression “offends the public”.

Claiming that LGBTQI sexual expression “offends the public”.

Claiming that LGBTQI public expression “offends the public”.

Claiming that  LGBTQI gender expression “threatens public order”

Claiming that LGBTQI age expression “threatens public order”.

Claiming that LGBTQI sexual expression “threatens public order”.

Claiming that LGBTQI public expression “threatens public order”.

Claiming that  LGBTQI gender expression “threatens public safety”.

Claiming that LGBTQI age expression “threatens public safety”.

Claiming that LGBTQI sexual expression “threatens public safety”.

Claiming that LGBTQI public expression “threatens public safety”.

Claiming that  LGBTQI gender expression “threatens public security”

Claiming that LGBTQI age expression “threatens public security”.

Claiming that LGBTQI sexual expression “threatens public security”.

Claiming that LGBTQI public expression “threatens public security”.

Claiming that  LGBTQI gender expression constitutes “pedophilia”.

Claiming that LGBTQI age expression constitutes “pedophilia”.

Claiming that LGBTQI sexual expression constitutes “pedophilia”.

Claiming that LGBTQI public expression constitutes “pedophilia”.

Claiming that  LGBTQI gender expression constitutes “exhibitionism”.

Claiming that LGBTQI age expression constitutes “exhibitionism”.

Claiming that LGBTQI sexual expression constitutes “exhibitionism”.

Claiming that LGBTQI public expression constitutes “exhibitionism”.

Claiming that  LGBTQI gender expression constitutes “voyeurism”.

Claiming that LGBTQI age expression constitutes “voyeurism”.

Claiming that LGBTQI sexual expression constitutes “voyeurism”.

Claiming that LGBTQI public expression constitutes “voyeurism”.

Claiming that  LGBTQI gender expression constitutes “sexual harassment”.

Claiming that LGBTQI age expression constitutes “sexual harassment”.

Claiming that LGBTQI sexual expression constitutes “sexual harassment”.

Claiming that LGBTQI public expression constitutes “sexual harassment”.

Anti-Intergenerational Excuses

Claiming expression of sexual attraction to legal minors above the age of consent (i.e. ephebophilia) constitutes “pedophilia”

Claiming that expression of widespread non-primary sexual preference for legal minors below the age of consent constitutes “pedophilia”.

Claiming that expression pedophile identity constitutes “pedophilia” and cause for legal action.

Claiming that expression of pedophile identity politics constitutes “pedophilia” and cause for legal action.

Claiming that expression pedophiles cannot control themselves sexually.

Claiming that pedophiles are inherent criminals.

Claiming that pedophiles are instrinsic criminals.

Claiming that pedophilia is a crime.

Claiming that pedophiles are dangerous.

Claiming that pedophiles are violent.

Claiming that pedophilies are criminals.

Claiming that public hatred against pedophiles justifies illegal measures.

Claiming that advocacy for changed sex laws constitutes pedophilia.

Claiming that advocacy for changed sex laws constitutes sex crime.

Claiming that pedophile advocacy constitutes sex crime.

Claiming that websites of “suspected pedophiles” must be shut down by any and all means.

Claiming that persecution of pedophilia advocates is justified by “public sentiment”.

Claiming that it is legitimate to commit crimes against “suspected pedophiles”.

Anti-BDSM Excuses

Claiming that BDSM practitioners are violent sex criminals.

Claiming that BDSM practitioners are potential sex criminals.

Claiming that BDSM practitioners are mentally ill.

Claiming that BDSM practitioners must be harassed in the interest of preventing violent crime.

Claiming that BDSM constitutes crimes.

Claiming that BDSM constitutes a threat against children.

Claiming that BDSM are sexual deviant which is not a legal argument as perceived “sexual deviance” certainly is not a crime.

Anti-Sex Work Excuses

Claiming that female sex workers do not understand their best interest and therefore are mentally incapable.

Claiming that female sex workers do not understand their best interest and therefore are insane.

Claiming that female sex workers do not understand their best interest and therefore are “mentally retarded”.

Claiming that female sex workers do not understand their best interest and therefore suffer from “personality disorders”.

Claiming that promiscuous females are prostitutes.

Claiming that polyamorous females are prostitutes.

Claiming that females in sensually appealing clothes are prostitutes.

Claiming that females in heavy makeup are prostitutes.

Claiming that females with elaborate hairstyles are prostitutes

Claiming that being a prostitute is a crime

Claiming that being looking sexually attractive in public space is a crime.

Claiming that it is prostitution for females to publicly express sexual interest in males.

Claiming that it is prostitution for females to express sexual interest in males who are significantly their elders.

Claiming that it is prostitution for males to express sexual interest in females significantly their junior.

Claiming that it is prostitution for females to sexually behave like males.

Claiming that it is prostitution to “look like a prostitute”.

Claiming that feminism is prostitution.

Claiming that feminist activism is prostitution.

Claiming that feminists are prostitutes.

Claiming that non-commercial sexual contact with a sex worker is prostitution.

Claiming that non-commercial sexual intercourse with a sex worker is prostitution.

IV. Legal statements

Legal notice: the above list is incomplete due to the vast nature of organized crime against perceived members of perceived members of desire, against sex workers and against transgender persons.

Please internalize that being transgender or being a sex worker are not sexual orientations.

Please intrernalize that paraphilia is not a crime.

Please internalize that diagnosis is not a crime.

Please internalize that identity is not a crime.

Please internalize that political opinion is not a crime.

Please internalize that expression of political opinion is not a crime

Please internalize that political advocacy is not a sexual orientation. Please internalize that political advocacy is not a crime.

Please internalize that refusal to abide by widespread prejudice is not a crime unless specified so under law.

Please understand that refusal to abide by widespread prejudice is not a crime unless specified so under law.

Please understand that a crime is a crime even if committed by a government employee.

Please understand that a crime is a crime even if committed by an intelligence operative.

Please understand that miscarriage of justice is miscarriage of justice no matter whom it targets.

V. Conclusion

The system of system of justice is thoroughly criminal as these practices are general practices within law enforcement.

LEGAL WARNING: Be aware that the above is a legal document; is not political in nature, does not express sexual preference, does not condone violation of law, does not encourage violation of law, opposes violation of law, does not constitute political advocacy and does not constitute violation of law in the KINGDOM OF SWEDEN, in the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and in the STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

The Intelligence Entrapment Methods documentation project.

Entrapment_logo