What does it mean to a royal? Is it a right or a burden? How true is the public image of royals? How did royals typically lead life and how do they live now? What are the obligations of being a royal? What are the rights? Why is it so difficult? What is the connection between royalty and gender? How is royal sexuality different from plebeian sexuality? What about classism, do royals regard themselves as superiors to others and if so how? What is the distinction between “is and ought” in royal life? Are royal genders different from other genders? How do royals relate to hypocrisy? What is the difference between a reigning majesty and other royals? What does it psychologically mean to be a royal and why is it contrary to public perception not enviable at all? Why is it so hard and why is it so painfully burdensome?
The public perception of royals is true in the sense of royals being taught exceptionally good manners. But otherwise is there not much truth to the public perception of royals. Royals in Europe have even since the Renaissance period ALL lived under protected identities and this includes royal heads of state who ever since have lead most of their lives with intelligence morphing under protected identity. Most tasks relate to intelligence agencies, the military and military executions, something which is not dull but certainly sad, much like regularly serving at funerals.
Meeting ordinary people is extremely difficult due to ordinary people not knowing how to appropriately behave in typically behaving either too high or too low. This however is much easier while under protected identity since then ordinary people behave ordinarily although there is usually constant psychological pain in observing other making of fool of themselves due to not having been taught how to not having been taught how to conduct themselves.
There have always been secret royals with most royals being COMPLETELY UNKNOWN to the public. Royals were usually born as half-twins, known as DUPLETS and since the 20th century have most gynogenic royals been born as SEPTUPLETS, a.k.a so called “archangels”. The public persona of an androgenic royal person is usually played by two persons, i.e. the person legally holding the identity and his DUPLET. The official role is a learned intelligence role and is ALWAYS conducted under INTELLIGENCE MORPHING which is STANDARD PROCEDURE everywhere all time.
Royals are treated as adults from an early age and parents ALWAYS have sex with their own children from toddler age and onwards. This is not the EXCEPTION but the rule. Raising children has three main aspects 1) shielding young royals from negative influences, 2) leading by example with MINIMAL CORRECTION and only rarely very mild corporal punishment and 3) teaching love by means of SEX.
What about law then, do not royals have to follow the same laws as everyone else? There is a distinction between royals who are introduced members of the NOBLE COURT and all other royals. The first category follow MILITARY LAW ONLY and this by the way applies to all introduced members of the court and entirely irrespective of whether being royals or not. Other royals have SPECIAL LEGAL STATUS in that they are OBLIGED TO METICULOUSLY adhere by CIVILIAN LAW other than with respect to SEXUALITY. What does military law state about royal sexuality? Royals do as they please with respect to interpersonal intimacy as long as VERY STRICTLY ADHERING by NOBLE COURT ETIQUETTE.
What then about royals who commit crimes? MILITARY LAW IS UNAMBIGUOUS with respect to CRIMINAL ROYALS in that EXECUTION IS COMPULSORY. A person who was not born into nobility was considered FULLY NOBLE and was AUTOMATICALLY considered for ennoblement. A BORN NOBLE with normally non-noble conduct was considered NON-NOBLE and treated as such. High nobility is a breeding pool where NOBODY CARES even the slightest as to who is the biological father for that would be VERY LOWLY indeed. ENNOBLED PERSONS were intensely admired and TREATED LIKE ROYALS. BEING ENNOBLED WAS CONSIDERED FAR BETTER THAN BEING BORN NOBILITY. Why is this so? Because NOBILITY is performative, meaning you are not whom you were born but you are as noble as you normally conduct yourself.
But do not royals with noble conduct misbehave sometimes? They certainly do but royals are taught in intelligence training to carefully control themselves in becoming mistresses of their own emotions. This does not imply conducting emotional repression but rather accepting one’s own emotions without fear and learning to appropriately express those very emotions. A royal behaves ANGRILY either 1) for VIRTUOUS purposes of the emotional rod of correction or 2) for operatives purposes as intelligence operatives. Uncontrolled outbursts is otherwise considered MOST INAPPROPRIATE although of course NOBODY IS PERFECT.
Royal conduct is based on selfless refinement and sexual liberation. A royal who is not FUNCTIONALLY BISEXUAL is considered LOWLY and is DESPISED as BOURGEOIS. A royal despises LOWLINESS irrespective of social class and treats others ENTIRELY IRRESPECTIVE of SOCIAL CLASS and OTHER SHIBBOLETHS OF DISCRIMINATION/OPPRESSION. PREJUDICE such as against females, Jews or gays was ground for PERMANENT EXPULSION from the NOBLE COURT. MISOGYNIST OPPRESSORS IN NOBILITY WERE SUBJECTED TO NEAR AUTOMATIC EXECUTION and CARE WAS MADE TO AVOID EVEN MENTIONING THEM, LET ALONE THEIR NAMES.
The IDEAL of royal gender is SAINTLY LIFE and therefore are royals educated by nuns, rabbis, priests etc. A royal MUST NOT MISTREAT others on account of social class as CLASSISM is considered MOST LOWLY indeed. How did royals historically relate to members of other social classes? First was sex WITHIN THE IMMEDIATE FAMILY ONLY and NEVER UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES WHATSOEVER WITH MEMBERS of OTHER SOCIAL CLASSES and second was COURT SEX freely conducted within the NOBLE COURT in STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH COURT ETIQUETTE. Any sign of misbehavior of any member of the court of any gender or anatomy led to ritual, surely painful but not excessively painful corporal punishment.
Royals outwardly sometimes pretend fealty with RELIGIOUS IMPERIALISM but of course do not believe in such nonsense since they are raised in secretive religious societies of MEDIAN JUDAISM with SUMERIAN GYNOCENTRIC RITUAL SEX. NOBLE COURT cultures were REMARKABLY SIMILAR WORLDWIDE including in AFRICA and the WESTERN HEMISPHERE with all having shared historical origins in SUMER, the first civilization in world history.
Noble sex is conducted IN STRICT COMPLIANCE with NOBLE COURT ETIQUETTE and CAREFULLY AESTHETICALLY CONTROLLED CHOREOGRAPHY. NON-NOBLE SEXUAL CONDUCT AT THE NOBLE COURT was GROUND FOR EXECUTION and led to INQUISITORIAL TRIAL so as to determine whether there was reason to suspect DEMONIC POSSESSION or SATANISM. Whether acquitted or not did it lead to public humiliation and PERMANENT EXPULSION FROM THE NOBLE COURT and LOSS OF GRANTED ESTATE. Most members of HIGH NOBILITY were born as DUPLETS and so was it common for an executed member of HIGH NOBILITY to CONTINUE TO EXIST AS A PUBLIC PERSONA in the form of the DUPLET who as a half-twin was physically indistinguishable yet with a distinctive although not entirely dissimilar personality.
High Nobility is a genetic hierarchy with members of HIGH NOBILITY ALL BEING GENETICALLY DESIGNED BY AND DESCENDED FROM VARIOUS REINCARNATIONS OF GOD and the REINCARNATION was a regular visitor at NOBLE COURTS WORLDWIDE FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSEMINATING FEMALE MEMBERS OF THE COURT FOR RELIGIOUS EUGENIC PURPOSES. DISTINCTIONS OF RANK ARE THOSE OF THE ANGELIC HIERARCHY and REINCARNATION WAS CONSIDERED THE MAIN VEHICLE OF SUCCESSION. ALL INTRODUCED MEMBERS OF THE COURT WERE MARRIED as that was a compulsory requisite.
ONLY MEMBERS OF HIGH NOBILITY as well as ENNOBLED PERSONS were admitted to the NOBLE COURT. SENIOR RABBIS SERVED IN ADVISORY POSITIONS TO EUROPEAN MAJESTIES BUT the RELATIONSHIP WAS MOSTLY HIGHLY COVERT as mostly taking place by MEANS of STANDARD COVERT INTELLIGENCE COMMUNICATION. FROM THE RENAISSANCE AND ONWARDS WERE ALL PRESUMPTIVE EUROPEAN ROYALS TAUGHT HEBREW AND COVERTLY TRAINED IN ELITE YESHIVOT (rabbinic seminaries) under protected identity. Becoming a CARDINAL was also a compulsory part of training for a presumptive majesty for future UNSELFISH SERVICE.
BEING HETEROCULTURAL WAS CONSIDERED THE LOWLIEST OF THE LOWLIEST as an UTTER CONDITION OF ABOMINABLE DEPRAVATION in TRAGIC SEXUAL DEPRIVATION INDEED. Purchasing sexual services was ABSOLUTELY PROHIBITED for three reasons 1) because of the mutual indignity in not acting out pure and sheer love of mutual personhood, 2) due to the possibility that the harlot was enslaved and exploited by an intermediary and 3) historically due to the risk of dissemination of VENEREAL DISEASE.
The MOST IMPORTANT TASK OF A MAJESTY IS TO RESCUE LADIES IN DISTRESS and this was so for the RARE FEMALE MAJESTIES AS WELL. This related to launching covert rescue operations to liberate abused females as well as picking up a HARLOT in the STREET, bringing HER SACRED PERSON to THE PALACE for RITUALLY ENNOBLING ORAL SEX whereby she consumed the PHALLUS of the MAJESTY in non-erect state as is the VATICAN CONVENTION in dignifying RESCUED HARLOTS. The MAJESTY RESTORES HER PERSONAL DIGNITY BY KISSING HER HAND AND CHEEK, WARMLY HUGGING HER IN THE WAY OF FEMALES AND ATTENTIVELY CONVERSING WHILE LOVELY TENDING FOR HER TEARS WITH A HANDKERCHIEF. NO PENETRATIVE SEX TAKES PLACE AND AFTER TWO HOURS OF AUDIENCE IS SHE TURNED OVER TO A CLOISTER FOR COMPREHENSIVE REHABILITATION. The MAJESTY treats her as a fellow CARDINAL and uses the form “your holiness” in conversation with her. She cries in the arms of the MAJESTY and never sees the MAJESTY AGAIN after the audience. THE DIVINE PURPOSE was for her to experience something so LOVELY that it would FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORM HER LIFE and her perception of herself and the world. A Majesty is A CARDINAL AND A DEACON and DEACONRY to HARLOTS is the MAIN PURPOSE IN LIFE for a MAJESTY. EVERYTHING ELSE IS SECONDARY.
All traditional court cultures had remarkably similar systems of etiquette and irrespectively so of continent. Japanese court etiquette is the BY FAR MOST SOCIALLY AND INTIMATELY REFINED FORM OF COURT ETIQUETTE while FRENCH COURT ETIQUETTE IS THE BY FAR MOST EROTICALLY REFINED FORM OF COURT ETIQUETTE.