Denial of Israel’s Right to Control its own Frontiers/Borders

Claiming that a purely gentile “right of return” supersedes Israeli sovereignty.
Claiming that a purely gentile “right of return” supersedes Jewish self-determination.
Claiming that a purely gentile “right of return” supersedes Israeli democracy.
Claiming that the Israel’s titular repatriation legislation is unique and constitutes racism.
Claiming that Israel’s sovereign border controls constitute “Apartheid.”
Claiming that closure of borders of sovereign Israeli territory constitutes occupation.
Denying Israel the right to close border passages located on sovereign Israeli territory.
Demanding that Israel maintains open borders with belligerent adversaries in times of war.
Demanding that Israel maintain free migration with belligerent adversaries in times of war.
Claiming that Israeli sovereign embargo constitutes territorial occupation.
Claiming that ethnic minorities in Israel have the right to veto Israeli territorial concessions.
Denying Israel’s right to reject immigration of those who deny Israel’s right to exist.
Claiming that every form of food is “humanitarian” if supplied to the Hamas Gaza region.
Claiming that every form of civil supply is “humanitarian” if supplied to the Gaza region.
Claiming that Israel is obliged to accept entry of all enemy civilians during times of war.
Claiming that the Gaza region is an Israeli “prison”.
Denying Israel the right to deny entry to its territory to hostile enemy populations.
Claiming that Palestinians under Israeli siege are entitled to luxury consumption.
Claiming that Israel is disallowed to renounce citizenship of residents in ceded areas.
Assuming that Palestinian “RoR” is inalienable despite requiring EMPT of most Israeli Jews.
Claiming that Israel’s borders cannot be changed by bilateral international agreement.
Claiming that Israel may not cede minority areas by bilateral international agreement.
Claiming that local populations in Israel are sovereign to veto being bilaterally ceded.
Claiming that it is racist for Israel to expel foreign nationals.
Claiming that it is racist for Israel to repatriate guest workers.
Claiming that it is racist for Israel to repatriate families of guest workers.
Claiming that it is racist for Israel to repatriate children of guest workers.
Claiming that it is racist for Israel to repatriate economic migrants.
Claiming that it is racist for Israel to arrest foreign nationals prior to expulsion.
Claiming that it is racist for the Israeli police to seek out illegals prior to repatriation.
Claiming that Israeli expulsion of migrants is comparable to Nazi deportation of Jews.
“Israeli exclusion of foreign nationals discriminates against Israeli Palestinians.”
“Israeli border closure is a form of ethnic discrimination.”
Claiming that Israel must not live fire to prevent border infiltration of enemy stone-throwers.
Claiming that Israeli border forces must only shoot in strict self-defense.
Assuming that Israeli border forces must not use the threat of force to repel enemy infiltrators.
Claiming that Israeli control of its own sovereign frontiers constitute occupation.

Return to Typology of Antivrism