Assuming that the PLO/PA is a Legitimate Apartheid Government

Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate international counterpart.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate diplomatic player.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and an internationally legitimate polity.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate government.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate democracy.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and “a liberation organization.”
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a politically legitimate organization.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate political organization.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate political cause.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and “a non-ethnocracy”.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate political organization.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate political movement.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate national movement.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate national cause.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate secessionist movement.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and “an Anti-Apartheid movement”.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate international partner.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate national representative.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate a legitimate entity.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate organization.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate political ideology.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate aid recipient.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate peace partner.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and “a legitimate resistance movement”.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate diplomatic partner.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate “independent state”.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate social movement.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and politically legitimate.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate force against racism.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and internationally legitimate.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate force against racism.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate “national authority”.
Claiming that the PLO/PA is both “a Bantustan” and a legitimate political organization.
Seeking int’l recognition of PLO/PA statehood while claiming to be “a Bantustan.”

Return to Typology of Antivrism