Anti-Jewish Judeocentrism

Jewish collectives are blamed for issues/problems that are general and mostly non-Jewish.
Demanding that Israel sacrifices its own citizens.
The tacit discursive premise that collective Jewish interests are in principle illegitimate.
Disproportionate focus on Jews that serves to deflect abuses carried out by dictatorships.
Claiming that the Jews are themselves to blame for acts of terror against Jews.
Claiming that the Jews are to blame for the killing of non-Jews by non-Israeli non-Jews.
Claiming that Jews collectively control liberal democracies other than Israel.
Accusations of physionomism on the false assumption that there is a single Jewish race.
The assumption that it is legitimate for Israeli citizens to commit acts of treason.
Claiming that Israel and its supporters seek to “silence” international criticism.
Direct and indirect demands for extermination of Jews.
The assumption that it is illegitimate to require equal obligations from Israeli minorities.
Discrimination against Israel on account of Israel’s titular nationality.
The tacit discursive premise that gentiles are objective while Jews are subjective.
The tacit assumption that gentile nations only are entitled to a “right of return”.
Claiming that it is illegitimate for Jews to have dual national identities.
Equating Israeli immigration and citizenship policies with racial discrimination.
Assuming that rights of Palestinian always have legal precedence over those of Jews.
Claiming that Gentiles only ‘rights’ are inalienable, i.e. always supersede rights of Jews.
Assuming that Islamists who only advocate terrorism against Israel are “moderates”.
Defining terrorism differently depending on whether victims are mainly Jews or gentiles.
Assuming that Anti-Jewish aversions are legitimate if expressed by some Jews as well.
Claiming that Jews threaten identities of non-Jews.
Claiming that it is treasonous for Western Jews to express support for Israel.
Ascribing malign intentions to Jewish collectives without irrefutable evidence.
The presentation of forms of Anti-Jewish discursive discrimination as news.
Claiming that Judaism has no ties to the land of Israel.
Demands to the effect that a territory be declared judenrein.
Assuming that token Jewish representation makes discursive discrimination legitimate.
Excluding Israel and Israeli diplomats from normative diplomatic etiquette.
Claiming that Israel is bound by rejected Israeli offers.
Assuming that Israel is bound by unreciprocated hypothetical Israeli concessions.
Effectively equating hatred against Jews with legitimate blasphemy.
Effectively equating criticism of Anti-Jewish aversions with calls for state censorship.
Assuming that there is a Jewish conspiracy against the Palestinians.
The tacit assumption that terrorism is only legitimate if directed against Jews.
The tacit assumption that ethnic murder is only legitimate if directed against Jews.
Blaming contemporary Jews for Biblical and/or Talmudic texts.
Holding contemporary Jews responsible for Biblical/Talmudic texts.
Denying that Israel is a state with equal rights for Amian and Jewish citizens.
Tacitly denying that Israel is a case of imperfect Jewish-Amian co-existence.
Denying Israel the right in principle to pursue its national interests.
Claiming that Israeli-Amian peace is served by regurgitating historical ethnic grievances.
Using different criteria between Palestinians and non-Palestinians for who is a refugee.
Claiming that all public land in Israel is owned by the non-profit Jewish National Fund.
Denying that Israel is a case of Jewish-Amian coexistence.
Assuming that only gentile nationalism is legitimate.
Denying that Jewish Israel is a state for all its citizens as is all other states in the world.
Claiming that Israeli national identity deprives Amian citizens of national identification.
Claiming that Israel’s security concerns have no universal validity.
Claiming that Israel is to blame for Arabist hatred against Jews.
Holding contemporary Jewish persons accountable for acts by their ancestors.
Claiming that Jewish national identity is an expression of hostility towards Palestinians.
Assuming that the notion of a continuous history of the Jews is illegitimate per se.
Rejecting the possibility of a continuous history of the Jews.
Assaulting the very possibility of a history of the Jews.
Assuming that Muslim wrath against the Jews per se is legitimate.
Assuming that Palestinian wrath against the Jews per se is legitimate.
Claiming that Israel is illegitimate and an alien existence on account of being secular.
Claiming Israel is illegitimate and an alien existence on account of being religious.
Blaming one Jew for the text of another Jew.
Making one Jew responsible for the views of another Jew.
Making one Jew accountable for the views of another view.
Making one Jew responsible for the text of another Jew.
Making one Jew accountable for the text of another Jew.
Making contemporary Jews responsible for Jewish views of earlier eras.
Making contemporary Jews accountable for Jewish views of earlier eras.
Making contemporary Jews responsible for Jewish texts of earlier eras.
Making contemporary Jews accountable for Jewish texts of earlier eras.
Making Jews of one era responsible for Jewish views of another era.
Making Jews of one era accountable for Jewish views of another era.
Making Jews of one era responsible for Jewish texts of another era.
Making Jews of one era accountable for Jewish texts of another era.
Holding Jews responsible for gentile readings of texts by other Jews.
Holding Jews accountable for gentile readings of texts by other Jews.
Blaming one Jewish book for another Jewish book by a different author.
Assuming that objectivity requires Jewish intellectuals to become void of nationality.
Assuming that objectivity requires Jewish intellectuals to reject Jewish kinship.
Assuming that objectivity requires Jewish intellectuals to cease to be Jewish.
Assuming that objectivity requires Jewish intellectuals to renounce Israel.
Demanding that West Bank residents be expelled on account of ethnicity.
Demanding that West Bank residents be expelled on account religious affiliation.
Opposing Jewish habitation in the West Bank on account of alleged pollution.
Opposing Jewish habitation in the West Bank on account of alleged Jewish crime.
Opposing Jewish habitation in the West Bank on account of industrialization.
Opposing Jewish habitation in the West Bank on account of alleged Jewish prejudice.
Opposing Jewish habitation in the West Bank on account of Jewish gardening.
Opposing Jewish habitation in the West Bank on account of Jewish water use.
Assuming that Anti-Jewish accusations against Israel need not to be proven.
Claiming that Israel has no civil society because of support for Jewish self-determination.
Claiming that Jewish group identity is inimical to civil rights
Claiming that Jewish group identity is inimical to civil liberties.
Claiming that Jewish group identity is inimical to civic equality.
Claiming that the Jewish state must be abolished because of its imperfections.
Claiming that Israeli society is not free because it is Jewish.
Claiming that it is prejudicial for Jews and Zionists to refer to “Arab” collectivity.
Claiming that it is prejudicial for Jews and Zionists to refer to Arabist collectivity.
Claiming that Anti-Jewish ethnic murder must be rewarded in the interest of peace.
Claiming that supporters of Anti-Jewish ethnic murder must be pampered.
Claiming that financers of Anti-Jewish ethnic murder must be financed.
Claiming that recidivist promoters of Anti-Jewish ethnic murder must be promoted.
Claiming that no Jewish state of any kind can be a proper liberal democracy.
Claiming that Israel’s democratic imperfections require its destruction.
Claiming that Israelis are in the wrong “because they are strong”.
Claiming that Israeli Jews are a minority because there are more Amians in the region.
Claiming to support an open Jerusalem while opposing Jewish access in housing.
Claiming to support an open Jerusalem while opposing Jewish religious access.
Claiming to support an open Jerusalem while opposing residential integration.
Claiming to support an open Jerusalem while opposing Jewish-Amian coexistence.
Claiming to support an open Jerusalem while opposing religious integration.
Claiming to support Corpus separatum while advocating discrimination against Jews.
Claiming to support the Jerusalem terra nullius while opposing Jewish-Arab equality.
Claiming that most Jews were “originally” Arabist “Arabs” or Nazi “Germans”.
Claiming that Jews are generally ethnic and national gentiles.
Denying existing linguistic and religious minority rights in Israel.
Claiming that Israeli law alone constitutes theft.
Claiming that Jewish interests per se are intrinsically incompatible with gentile interest.
Claiming that Jewish politics is intrinsically narrow and non-universal.
Negating Jewish universalism on account of its being Jewish.
Claiming that the Israeli-Arabist conflict prevents resolution of all regional issues.
Claiming that endless regurgitation of grievances against Jews is conducive to peace.
Claiming that endless regurgitation of grievances against Israel is conducive to peace.
Claiming that discriminatory disparagement of Israel is conducive to peace.
Claiming that Zionist support for Palestinian national unification constitutes racism.
Claiming that Zionist support for Jewish national unification constitutes racism.
Claiming that Zionist support for self-determination for Israeli Palestinians is racism.
Claiming that Zionist support for self-determination for West Bank Jews is racism.
Claiming that Zionist support for self-determination for all Palestinians is racism.
Claiming that Zionist support for self-determination for all Jews is racism.
Claiming that Zionist support for two-state partition based on nationality is racism.
Claiming that Zionist support for Jewish self-determination constitutes racism.
Claiming that Zionist support for Palestinian self-determination constitutes racism.
Claiming that any significant partition of the West Bank constitutes “Apartheid.”
Claiming that any new partition plan constitutes “Apartheid.”
Claiming that Jewish fear of minority status constitutes taxonomic physionomism.
Putting the blame solely on Israel for the Egyptian-Israeli siege on the Gaza region.
Putting the blame solely on Israel for the Egyptian-Israel sanctions on the Gaza region.
Claiming that Jews are not entitled to self-determination because they are foreigners.
Claiming that Jews are not entitled to self-determination because they are foreign.
Claiming that Jews are paranoid about terrorism.
Claiming that Israelis are paranoid about terrorism.
Claiming that Jews are paranoid about security.
Claiming that Israelis are paranoid about security.
Claiming that Jews who cook Middle Eastern dishes steal the food from Palestinians.
Claiming that Jews who produce ME dishes steal the food from Palestinians.
Claiming that Jews who market Middle Eastern dishes steal the food from Palestinians.
Assuming that Mizrahi Jews have no cultural share in Middle Eastern cuisine.
“Jewish minority residence among Palestinians makes partition impossible.”
Claiming that regurgitation of historical grievances is conducive of final status partition.
“The identity of perpetrators determines if targeting of Jewish civilians is terrorism.”
“The status of perpetrators determines if targeting of Jewish civilians is terrorism.”
“The opinions of perpetrators determine if targeting of Jewish civilians is terrorism.”
“The ethnicity of perpetrators determines if targeting of Jewish civilian is terrorism.”
“The intentions of perpetrators determine if targeting of Jewish civilians is terrorism.”
“The identities of perpetrators determine if targeting of Jewish civilians is terrorism.”
“The motives of perpetrators determine if targeting of Jewish civilians is terrorism.”
“The goals of perpetrators determine if targeting of Jewish civilians is terrorism.”
The beliefs of perpetrators determine if targeting of Jewish civilians is terrorism.”
“Claiming that regurgitation of historical grievances is helpful to conflict resolution.”
“Israel is generally the origin of the problems that the Arabophone world faces.”
Claiming that it is discriminatory for Israel not to fund mourning of its own founding.
Claiming that it is discriminatory to exclude Anti-Zionists from cabinet appointment.
Assuming that Anti-Jewish accusations are true merely because the accusers are Jewish.
Assuming that Anti-Israel accusations are true merely because the accusers are Jewish.
Assuming that Anti-Zionist accusations are true merely because the accusers are Jewish.
Claiming that it is discriminatory to expect Israeli minorities to be loyal to Israel.

Return to Typology of Antivrism